Finally someone speaks with a brain...
I love how people post up links as a resource and make claim that it is the absolute truth. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone yet everyone on this site like to post links from wikipedia as there source.
Originally Posted by Wyldeman30
You know, even wikipedia is better than just shooting from (slightly lower than) the hip. It indicates that someone's taken the time to try and find corroboration for his/her points in a debate. Everything on WIKIPEDIA is sourced in the bibliography below. You can't quote wikipedia in a paper, true, but you can certainly click the link and quote the source of each statement on there for inclusion in a bibliography. What kind of BS is that?
(if you say the unbelievable kind, you win!)
Now if you look closely at the information contained in F-sharp's post, you'll see, in tiny little print that each of those graphs are sourced not by WIKIPEDIA (which is a collection of contributions and NOT a source) but links to the U.S. Treasury Department and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Even has dates.
OK, maybe you know something they don't. But I'm guessing official stats certainly qualify as source material here.
So what's the problem? I remember Vice President Spiro Agnew's great battle with the news media (which actually WAS held to a standard of accuracy back then); whenever he couldn't refute an accusation or claim, he simply called the media a bunch of liars. Easy way out. And of course, Agnew was shown the door sooner rather than later; forced to resign in shame, after indictments on extortion, conspiracy and bribery charges. HE ATTACKED THE MEDIA AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ALL THE WAY. Nixon gave him up to shut him up.
BTW -- even quoting from a blog (THE WORST SOURCE FOR REAL INFO) is better than shooting from (slightly lower than) the hip. The Heritage Foundation is slightly to the right of Atilla the Hun, imho.
Anyway, all I can say is Obama is killing us doctors here.
And how is Obama hurting "you doctors here?" I attended one or two health care reform townhalls and heard contrasting stories from doctors about the proposed reform package. Oddly, those opinions seemed to vary by specialty. I'm guessing you're a radiologist, dermatologist or some other kind of "ologist."
If so, then you KNOW that Congress has been dicking around with Medicare reimbursement for years now and won't go through with the 20-40% cuts that were passed under Bush's regime. Sure, it needs overhaul, and it was wrong that you had to go a couple of days without reimbursement. Hence the constant band-aids. But you're going to blame that on Barry O?
Let's see...is Obama keeping you from getting a new health records system? If you're a primary care doctor then he's paying you to get one.
Taking away your medical school loan repayment program? (No, that was Perry's Texas who slashed that out. Fed still provides that perk to new docs.)
Making you work for a hospital? (No, again that's Perry.)
Is he making your malpractice premiums go up? (Puh-leeze! We've got the best tort laws in Texas for docs and in fact are attracting a lot of new docs to Texas who might not be safe practicing in another state.)
How is he KILLING you doctors. I'm REAL anxious to hear this one.