Thank the Tea Party!

Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 05-26-2014, 10:25 AM
We have already determined the proper limits of government. It's the Constitution. If government would follow it, we'd be much stronger and free. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Not quite that easy. The constitution has gray areas and must at times be interpreted. Clearly, not every one interprets it the same way. As a result one person can truly believe they ARE following the constitution, and another can believe the first one is not.

Additionally, there is the issue of what amendments do or do not deserve to be passed. I am in Colorado for a few days and a popular topic of conversation here seems to be a push to repeal the repeal of prohibition--and to insist that the original prohibition amendment actually applies to marijuana as well. And these folks do identify themselves as conservatives.

It isn't as simple as you say.
Stay proud of your stupidity. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Ahhh, brought to us by the proud Dipshit who was stupid enough to start a Dipshit of the Year thread and nominate himself to be a leading contender.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
You know he's dying for the title.
You know he's dying for the title. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Hanoi COG not only nominated himself but he is also self-appointed to the throne.

Congratulations Hanoi COG, it couldn't have happened to a more worthy recipient!

Indeed, you are a true-blue, one-of-a-kind Dipshit!



Originally Posted by bigtex




Glad you liked it... I got more.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 05-26-2014, 08:40 PM
Cluttering the internet with voluminous stupid posts. In other words, typical IIFFy.
Cluttering the internet with voluminous stupid posts. In other words, typical IIFFy. Originally Posted by Old-T

Old-Trollop, glad you could make the party.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Not quite that easy. The constitution has gray areas and must at times be interpreted. Clearly, not every one interprets it the same way. As a result one person can truly believe they ARE following the constitution, and another can believe the first one is not.

Additionally, there is the issue of what amendments do or do not deserve to be passed. I am in Colorado for a few days and a popular topic of conversation here seems to be a push to repeal the repeal of prohibition--and to insist that the original prohibition amendment actually applies to marijuana as well. And these folks do identify themselves as conservatives.

It isn't as simple as you say. Originally Posted by Old-T
Most of it is pretty clear, unless you're a lawyer pushing an agenda for a special interest group. Read the thing. What part is hard to understand?