Greta Thunberg is Time Magazine Person of the Year.

This is actually the first time I bring up the popular vote. Quote me on any other time I mention it, and I'll praise your existence. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Of course I care about National Security, all Americans should. What I don't care about are the vindictive, excuse making bullshit the Democratic Party has been toting since Trump has been elected and their premeditated plan to Impeach him. They can't even settle on an impeachable offense because they don't have one. First we heard it was a "Quid quo pro" then Bribery, Obstruction of Justice and now I guess the big buzz word is Contempt of Congress. They need to make up their minds on what Donald Trump did to their fragile egos to become Impeachable, lol.

This is actually the first time I bring up the popular vote. Quote me on any other time I mention it, and I'll praise your existence. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

all you have to do is mention it once to show your "whataboutism" and lack of knowledge about the process of electing the president. don't worry you have plenty of others who are as clueless on this site and elsewhere.

Of course I care about National Security, all Americans should. What I don't care about are the vindictive, excuse making bullshit the Democratic Party has been toting since Trump has been elected and their premeditated plan to Impeach him. They can't even settle on an impeachable offense because they don't have one. First we heard it was a "Quid quo pro" then Bribery, Obstruction of Justice and now I guess the big buzz word is Contempt of Congress. They need to make up their minds on what Donald Trump did to their fragile egos to become Impeachable, lol. Originally Posted by Levianon17

Lol? The collective mind was made up. Abuse and obstruction. "Let me keep you from finding out how I'm violating you."

all you have to do is mention it once to show your "whataboutism" and lack of knowledge about the process of electing the president. don't worry you have plenty of others who are as clueless on this site and elsewhere. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Mention it once, but I bloviate about it? You sound stupid.

Lol? The collective mind was made up. Abuse and obstruction. "Let me keep you from finding out how I'm violating you."

if you say so.

Mention it once, but I bloviate about it? You sound stupid. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

it was stupid to bring it up at all. butt you knew that, right?

Lol? The collective mind was made up. Abuse and obstruction. "Let me keep you from finding out how I'm violating you."



Mention it once, but I bloviate about it? You sound stupid. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

You violate yourself by displaying your ignorance with glee.

it was stupid to bring it up at all. butt you knew that, right? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Then why did you, stupid?

You violate yourself by displaying your ignorance with glee. Originally Posted by Levianon17

Ignorance of what? Nice turn of phrase but I know not what you convey.

9500- the "collective mind' was made up the day afte the Nov 2016 election.

Who was violated - the DPST party feels violated and always will because their arrogant, nasty pompous bitch of a candidate got beaten by the middle America so despised by the Socialist Coastal DPST's.



Who sounds "stupid" - obviously depends on the individual haring/reading.

No pretending that the Impachment is not a slanted, biased, hyperpartisan machination.

I daresay - if 9500 was accused of a crime, and the procedure was predicated as the DPST's treated Trump - 9500 would be screaming for his Constitutional Rights - the sam Rights the DPST's have no interest in extending to anyone other than their own nomenklatura.

usual DPST hypocrisy - for more flagrant example see the Nadler/
schif criticism of the Senate for "pre-judging" and being prejudicial about the Impeachment trial vote.

I have never read anything so hypocritical in all my life.

Typical DPST's - no guilt, no shame, no facts - just "narrative truth"!
Still counting exclamation points 9500?

9500- the "collective mind' was made up the day afte the Nov 2016 election.

Who was violated - the DPST party feels violated and always will because their arrogant, nasty pompous bitch of a candidate got beaten by the middle America so despised by the Socialist Coastal DPST's.



Who sounds "stupid" - obviously depends on the individual haring/reading.

No pretending that the Impachment is not a slanted, biased, hyperpartisan machination.

I daresay - if 9500 was accused of a crime, and the procedure was predicated as the DPST's treated Trump - 9500 would be screaming for his Constitutional Rights - the sam Rights the DPST's have no interest in extending to anyone other than their own nomenklatura.

usual DPST hypocrisy - for more flagrant example see the Nadler/
schif criticism of the Senate for "pre-judging" and being prejudicial about the Impeachment trial vote.

I have never read anything so hypocritical in all my life.

Typical DPST's - no guilt, no shame, no facts - just "narrative truth"!
Still counting exclamation points 9500? Originally Posted by oeb11

You're a fuckin' idiot. I'm gonna keep watching the Bills versus Steelers.

No cogent response but name-calling.

Forgot the scatology.

may your nuclear blasts in the Galaxy calm One.

Outrage is deleterious to One's health!

Nice analogy. A nuclear blast in context of a galaxy is a hell of an image.

Ignorance of what? Nice turn of phrase but I know not what you convey. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Ignorance of the fact that the Democratic party is playing Russian Roulette with the Impeachment Process and that is a dangerous game to play for the future of the Presidency. Disappointment in the outcome of an Election doesn't give Congress the authority to disrupt the administration of a duly sworn president by abusing it's power by the use of the Impeachment process. That's exactly what the House is doing and they know it.

Ignorance of the fact that the Democratic party is playing Russian Roulette with the Impeachment Process and that is a dangerous game to play for the future of the Presidency. Disappointment in the outcome of an Election doesn't give Congress the authority to disrupt the administration of a duly sworn president by abusing it's power by the use of the Impeachment process. That's exactly what the House is doing and they know it. Originally Posted by Levianon17

No. Absolutely not.

I keep hearing duly elected president. Can we not stipulate the Russian government sought to place a Russian asset in control of the U.S. government for their own ascent? If not, we dispute global influence. The House has to check that appointment.

No. Absolutely not.

I keep hearing duly elected president. Can we not stipulate the Russian government sought to place a Russian asset in control of the U.S. government for their own ascent? If not, we dispute global influence. The House has to check that appointment. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

No, and No.

anything else you'd like to kNOw?

No, and No.

anything else you'd like to kNOw? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Yes, his financial records.