That is why President WTF would change the estate tax and slap it on a dead mans ass! Originally Posted by WTFDon't you mean "Emperor WTF"?
. I'm not familiar enough with the tax code to list them but it's apparent there are many.No Rudyard wants you to list all the ones that you want to get rid of!
Originally Posted by jenesys
That's kind of like saying let's get rid of all the bad guys.Let him bark...loopholes...shoompholes ..assholes
Why don't you get specific WTF?...which "loopholes" are you talking about? Originally Posted by Rudyard K
Fundamentally the government needs to cut services (& as a result spending). PERIOD Originally Posted by atlcomedyWhy not a two-pronged approach: raise income and cut spending. I'm willing to see the axe fall on spending so long as income rises.
Why not a two-pronged approach: raise income and cut spending. I'm willing to see the axe fall on spending so long as income rises.huh?
And no BS about "taxing businesses that supply jobs." The tax cuts are still in effect without new jobs, and there's no evidence for the "taxing businesses that supply jobs" BS theory. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005
Why not a two-pronged approach: raise income and cut spending. I'm willing to see the axe fall on spending so long as income rises. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005We've played that suckers game before. The tax increases get implemented and spending cuts don't.
All of them Originally Posted by WTF
No Rudyard wants you to list all the ones that you want to get rid of!
Tell ya what Rudyard, below is a link where you can buy the latest version of the tax code. How about we go over it with a fine tooth comb and straighten it out for the folks.
http://www.amazon.com/Federal-Income.../dp/0808021389 Originally Posted by WTF
I'm finished with mine. Rudyard might take a while longer. Sounds like there are some loopholes he might be fond of! Originally Posted by WTFI just wanted to see if you had any idea of what you were talking about when you said "Loopholes". I think I got my answer.