Please expain

Showing numbers and saying it benefits the Iraqi economy make you a fraud. It's not helping the people, you fucking moron. It's making a small percentage rich. Here's an article that describes how low oil prices are affecting the Iraqi economy.

http://www.militarytimes.com/story/m...ices/31919859/

http://www.oilandgas360.com/iraq-oil...d-slide-by-35/ Originally Posted by WombRaider

So lemme get this straight, sewer rat. You just provided links showing how reduced oil revenues are currently HURTING the Iraqi economy. Yet you also argue their economy doesn't BENEFIT when oil revenues are strong (as I just documented they were for 2010-2013). That's not logical, sewer rat. If something isn't helping you, then losing it can't hurt you. Rather than supporting your stupid argument, you just refuted it. Nice job shooting yourself in the foot again, you "motherfucking idiot"!

Take away their oil revenues and you take away 95% of the funding for the Iraqi national budget. Then they would have to raise taxes to pay for everything. How would that benefit the Iraqi economy or the Iraqi people?

And speaking of not helping the people - why don't you compare the Iraqi economy today to what it looked like under Saddam Hussein, who was siphoning billions in oil money earmarked for humanitarian needs under the UN embargo and using it to build dozens of huge luxury palaces around the country for himself and his charming sons, Uday and Qusay? You weren't bothered by that obscenity, were you dipshit?

I'm bored with handing you your ass, sewer rat. If you know anyone who can debate intelligently, bring them on. It really doesn't do anything for me to keep bitch-slapping the 2016 DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR. Nothing personal, of course.
.

So lemme get this straight, sewer rat. You just provided links showing how reduced oil revenues are currently HURTING the Iraqi economy. Yet you also argue their economy doesn't BENEFIT when oil revenues are strong (as I just documented they were for 2010-2013). That's not logical, sewer rat. Rather than supporting your stupid argument, you just refuted it! If something isn't helping you, then its loss can't hurt you. You just shot yourself in the foot again, idiot.

Take away their oil revenues and you take away 95% of the funding for the Iraqi national budget. Then they would have to raise taxes to pay for everything. How would that benefit the Iraqi economy and people?

And speaking of not helping the people - why don't you compare the Iraqi economy today to what it looked like under Saddam Hussein, who was siphoning billions in oil money earmarked for humanitarian needs under the UN embargo and using it to build dozens of huge luxury palaces around the country for himself and his charming sons, Uday and Qusay? You weren't bothered by that obscenity, were you dipshit?

I'm bored with handing you your ass, sewer rat. If you know anyone who can debate intelligently, bring them on. It really doesn't do anything for me to keep bitch-slapping the 2016 DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR. Nothing personal, of course.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

I said that oil revenues don't benefit the Iraqi people at large. Learn to read. And you're going to need to cite a source for your 95 percent claim or you can eat a dick. And then you go straight to bullshit hyperbole, contending that the only existence for Iraq is as it is now or as it was under Saddam, which you know isn't true, but is the only way you can even come close to making your point. Iraq has no personal income tax as we know it. And it's not exactly leading to greener pastures for most Iraqis.

http://kurdistantribune.com/2013/ira...or-corruption/

The power vacuum left by our invasion of Iraq is what gave rise to ISIS and what we are seeing today. This is incontrovertibly true.

I said that oil revenues don't benefit the Iraqi people at large. Learn to read. Originally Posted by WombRaider

The Iraqi economy is not benefitting from the oil. Originally Posted by WombRaider

.

No one ever thought we were talking about literally stealing their oil, you ignorant retard. Originally Posted by WombRaider

WE... KEEP TRYING TO STEAL THEIR OIL!!! Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Yeah. We steal oil. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

.

You also contended the Chinese were benefitting financially from Iraq's oil, which I also shot down. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Open the NYT link again, sewer rat - this time just read the headline out loud for everyone!

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/06/03...-oil-boom.html

"CHINA IS REAPING BIGGEST BENEFITS OF IRAQ OIL BOOM"



Thanks for being such a complete laughingstock today, sewer rat! Whew - I laughed so hard I'm out of breath right now! Keep it up and I won't be bored with you!



.

Add me to your ignore list. I dare you.

Micro aggression is you being upset at your little dick. Originally Posted by WombRaider

That is a stupid comment. I can put you on ignore anytime I want...coconut.

That is a stupid comment. I can put you on ignore anytime I want...coconut. Originally Posted by DSK

Do it...

. Originally Posted by lustylad

You didn't finish the sentence, because it doesn't support your lies. Here it is its entirety;

The Iraqi economy is not benefitting from the oil. The contracts are friendly to the oil companies, not the iraqi people.

Open the NYT link again, sewer rat - this time just read the headline out loud for everyone!

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/06/03...-oil-boom.html

"CHINA IS REAPING BIGGEST BENEFITS OF IRAQ OIL BOOM"



Thanks for being such a complete laughingstock today, sewer rat! Whew - I laughed so hard I'm out of breath right now! Keep it up and I won't be bored with you!



. Originally Posted by lustylad

They're not reaping the profits you claimed.

"Notably, what the Chinese are not doing is complaining. Unlike the executives of Western oil giants like Exxon Mobil, the Chinese happily accept the strict terms of Iraq’s oil contracts, which yield only minimal profits. China is more interested in energy to fuel its economy than profits to enrich its oil giants."

If laughing hard gets you out of breath, you're a fatter piece of shit than I imagined.

You got handed your ass again, you retarded fat bastard. Keep it up, I never get bored of illustrating what a goddamn fool you are.

I've never tried that.

When you do it are the wet ones more difficult than the dry ones to beat up?

IJA Originally Posted by LexusLover

woomby's "dry ones " are those that he and Big Sir made " crusty " from all of their twice-a-day ATM sessions. woomby likes his sheets like his pizza, with a " stuffed " crust ! And the " wet " part of his sheets are up around where he lays his DOTY head so he can suck up some ropey loads even in his sleep !

So lemme get this straight, sewer rat. You just provided links showing how reduced oil revenues are currently HURTING the Iraqi economy. Yet you also argue their economy doesn't BENEFIT when oil revenues are strong (as I just documented they were for 2010-2013). That's not logical, sewer rat. If something isn't helping you, then losing it can't hurt you. Rather than supporting your stupid argument, you just refuted it. Nice job shooting yourself in the foot again, you "motherfucking idiot"!

Take away their oil revenues and you take away 95% of the funding for the Iraqi national budget. Then they would have to raise taxes to pay for everything. How would that benefit the Iraqi economy or the Iraqi people?

And speaking of not helping the people - why don't you compare the Iraqi economy today to what it looked like under Saddam Hussein, who was siphoning billions in oil money earmarked for humanitarian needs under the UN embargo and using it to build dozens of huge luxury palaces around the country for himself and his charming sons, Uday and Qusay? You weren't bothered by that obscenity, were you dipshit?

I'm bored with handing you your ass, sewer rat. If you know anyone who can debate intelligently, bring them on. It really doesn't do anything for me to keep bitch-slapping the 2016 DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR. Nothing personal, of course.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

Mebbe if you gave the DOTY 2016 the "salute " that he demands of all of his reach-around crew and his serfs down at the 'holes at the start of all your responses to him, he might pay a little more attention. Said salute > IJS..........:wavet owel2:

Good grief, sewer rat! You can't even keep an argument straight for 5 seconds! Here you are in post #98 saying the oil companies are making out like bandits at the expense of the Iraqi economy:

The Iraqi economy is not benefitting from the oil. The contracts are friendly to the oil companies, not the iraqi people. Originally Posted by WombRaider

And here you are in the very next post (#99) saying thc Chinese oil companies - who are by far the biggest buyers of Iraqi crude - barely make any profit on their contracts!

"... the Chinese happily accept the strict terms of Iraq’s oil contracts, which yield only minimal profits." Originally Posted by WombRaider

Keep posting, you stupid fuck! It's extremely entertaining to watch you trip all over yourself and directly contradict what you just said 5 seconds ago!

Today's debaters are - WOOMBY VERSUS WOOMBY!


.

Good grief, sewer rat! You can't even keep an argument straight for 5 seconds! Here you are in post #98 saying the oil companies are making out like bandits at the expense of the Iraqi economy:



And here you are in the very next post (#99) saying thc Chinese oil companies - who are by far the biggest buyers of Iraqi crude - barely make any profit on their contracts!



Keep posting, you stupid fuck! It's extremely entertaining to watch you trip all over yourself and directly contradict what you just said 5 seconds ago!

Today's debaters are - WOOMBY VERSUS WOOMBY!


. Originally Posted by lustylad

In 98 it was clear I was referencing US oil companies, idiot. Keep eating retard sandwiches, shitbird. It's extremely entertaining to watch a fat piece of shit get out of breath from laughing so hard.

Clarification: "We" don't steal their oil. "We" make it possible for Big Oil to steal it. Feel better now? As long as they bow to our terms, we leave them alone. If they want to change those terms, suddenly they have weapons of mass destruction, or are harboring terrorists, or some other fiction so we can send the Marines "to defend freedom". It's bullshit.