Amy Coney Barrett Should be Confirmed ASAP

DONE DEAL < DPST clowns can cry and have temper tantrums now Originally Posted by rexdutchman

NYC Progressives Call on Schumer to Expand Supreme Court or Be Held ‘Accountable’


https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...d-accountable/

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi cited population growth as a justification for the potential court-packing push during a Monday night interview.

Asked on MSNBC whether she is “open to efforts” to add seats to the Supreme Court, known as packing the court, Pelosi left the question open.

https://www.govexec.com/management/2...kforce/169551/

The order instructs agencies to identify which positions qualify as policy-making and transfer existing career workers into the new job classification, stripping them of their civil service protections and making them effectively at-will employees. OPM last week told agencies that they would have wide latitude in deciding which jobs would meet the requirements for the new Schedule F, exacerbating fears among federal employee groups and good government experts that the White House plans to sidestep more than a century of civil service laws.

Shit is real folks.

Keep pushing.

Commie ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

hirono

is it her tone? is it her substance? is it the look on her face?

it is all three that define her

there seems to be no love in her

just an irrational racist hatred Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

I keep wondering who the hell voted for this asshole? Could the majority of Hawaiians believe what she does?

For those that missed her swearing in speech, I'll post it. Senator Graham said it was the most articulate statement he had ever heard outlining what a Conservative Justice believes and will bring to the court. This is one very impressive jurist.


Leaving out of the thank you's, this was the meat of the speech.

This separation of duty from political preference is what makes the judiciary distinct among the three branches of government. A judge declares independence, not only from Congress and the President, but also from the private beliefs that might otherwise move her. The Judicial Oath captures the essence of the judicial duty. The rule of law must always control.

How Mitch McConnell Delivered Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Rapid Confirmation


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/u...firmation.html

Mr. McConnell’s reshaping of the courts was the result of a strategic plan by a man who became obsessed with the Senate’s role in filling the federal judiciary during his early days as a staff aide during the Nixon administration. While he could not predict that his blockade of Mr. Obama’s 2016 nominee, Judge Merrick B. Garland, would pay political dividends, the vacancy was credited with solidifying conservative support needed to elect Mr. Trump in 2016.

With Mr. Trump headed to the White House, Mr. McConnell immediately began planning with Donald F. McGahn II, the incoming White House counsel, to set up a confirmation assembly line to fill the dozens of lower federal court seats that Mr. McConnell had held vacant in the last two years of the Obama presidency. Republicans changed longstanding Senate practices to speed their work along by denying Democrats procedural tools to block nominees.

Payback's a bitch.

How Mitch McConnell Delivered Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Rapid Confirmation


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/u...firmation.html












Payback's a bitch.
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Dims are just upset that they didnt do the same thing! If you noticed Republicans never increased the number of justices!But the loser dims will, given a half a chance!52-48 if you missed it! bahahahahahahahhahahahah

How Mitch McConnell Delivered Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Rapid Confirmation


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/u...firmation.html

Payback's a bitch. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

you're quite right.

its payback for what the senate democrats did to bush 41 when they held up judicial nominations during an election year.

Poor 9500- the number of foolish memes shows just how upset the DPST's are about barret - and as Schumer vowed 'revenge' - 9500 and ilk are planning to pack the SC if they get the Senate.

Pray they don't - for freedom and representative democracy - all of which 9500 and ilk hate in favor of a Che' totalitarian 'Paradise"!
DPST's are existential threats to the Constitution and Rule of law - they have made that clear.

Vote - and be very afraid of the results if DPST;s take the Senate!

you're quite right.

its payback for what the senate democrats did to bush 41 when they held up judicial nominations during an election year. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

One of Barrett’s first cases asks if religion is a license to discriminate against LGBTQ people


https://www.vox.com/2020/10/30/21538...religion-lgbtq

Understanding how the Court’s approach to religious liberty has changed over time is important to understanding the Fulton case — and to understanding why the Fulton plaintiffs’ position is a radical break with nearly all of the Court’s previous precedents interpreting the Constitution’s free exercise protections.

A big reason why the Supreme Court’s religious liberty cases can be confusing is that the Court made an unfortunate choice of words in Sherbert. Sherbert held that the government typically cannot enforce a particular law against someone who objects to that law on religious grounds unless the government’s reasons for doing so are supported by a compelling state interest.

She will split those pubic hairs.

Do you think she's shaved?

Poor 9500- triggered much - DPST????

TDS its real

Originally Posted by texassapper

Worthy of another post! Highly doubt this message will sink in with the dims!