Elections have consequences! Originally Posted by LexusLoverNo oil sanctions , no real sanctions.
Fake sanctions. . .
Iran is the North Korea of the Middle East. Originally Posted by I B HankeringNot according to our top Intel Chiefs. ..
Trump is right and the rest of the world is wrong. LOLThe Iranian engineer who admitted that Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one doesn't work for Trump. Your spin suggesting he does would make you wrong.
Love you trumkins spin on everything.
At least you did remember to put FIFY this time. Originally Posted by bamscram
Bamscram if you want to read something comical read adavs posts in this tread when he reply's to IBs nonsense. I almost felt sorry for IB. Adav knew his shit. IB was searching the internet. It was like watching a Rocky movie. IB got hammered. Adav is wearing the USA colors. IB is the RussianThat the Iranian engineer admitted Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one means that anyone trying to defend Odumbo's broke-ass treaty doesn't have a factual leg to stand on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbVqciFRioA Originally Posted by themystic
Not according to our top Intel Chiefs. ..Sources closer to Iran say differently.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-...uclear-weapons Originally Posted by WTF
The Iranian engineer who admitted that Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one doesn't work for Trump. Your spin suggesting he does would make you wrong.
That the Iranian engineer admitted Iran intentionally violated the terms of Odumbo's treaty from day-one means that anyone trying to defend Odumbo's broke-ass treaty doesn't have a factual leg to stand on.
Sources closer to Iran say differently.
http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Trump's own security people said he was wrong on Iran, North Korea, and ISIS. Originally Posted by bamscramSources closer to Iran say differently.
Sources closer to Iran say differently.If you keep lying IB adav is going to get on and school you again
http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Sources closer to Iran say differently.
http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Originally Posted by bamscramA goofy emoticon is the best retort you could muster? Meanwhile:
I B has a source in Iran!Sources closer to Iran say what they say, and no doubt the DNI sudied those Photoshopped images provided to them by the Iranians before they came to their conclusion.
He knows more evidently than Trumpds handpicked heads of the CIA,FBI and NIA. Originally Posted by WTF
Sources closer to Iran say differently.Your source may live in Iran but he lies just as much as you do. Of course they gave up a lot. Your source said they didn't give up much. Your source said Iran can enrich Uranium to 20% U-235 concentration. Iran did give up a lot. Before the deal that Obama cut with them, they had 20,000 centrifuges in operation, 19,000 slow speed and 1000 high speed. As part of the Iran had to turn off 13,000 slow speed centrifuges and all 1000 high speed centrifuges. Iran can only enrich to 3.76% U-235 concentration. In 2015 they had enriched up to 20%. They had to sell or trade the highly enriched Uranium concentrations between 5 and 20%, for natural Uranium in return that has a U-235 concentration of .07%. The only Iran plant that is allowed to to enrich up to 3.76 percent is under constant monitoring 24/7 in real time. These constraints will be lifted in 10 years. Therefore Kerry WAS NOT LYING, if the centrifuges are turned off for 10 years, there is no way for Iran to enrich the Uranium. The chart in the link below sums up the deal, which was backed by America's best scientists. If Iran did not give up anything they would have already had a nuclear weapon. Your source statements contradicts the statements of Allbright, who said Iran must turn on the centrifuges and start enriching again if they want a nuclear weapon. They both can't be right one of them has to be wrong. Allbright is suppose to be taking information from documents that Israel stole.
http://jcpa.org/article/iran-continu...ties-unabated/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Your source may live in Iran but he lies just as much as you do. Of course they gave up a lot. Your source said they didn't give up much. Your source said Iran can enrich Uranium to 20% U-235 concentration. Iran did give up a lot. Before the deal that Obama cut with them, they had 20,000 centrifuges in operation, 19,000 slow speed and 1000 high speed. As part of the Iran had to turn off 13,000 slow speed centrifuges and all 1000 high speed centrifuges. Iran can only enrich to 3.76% U-235 concentration. In 2015 they had enriched up to 20%. They had to sell or trade the highly enriched Uranium concentrations between 5 and 20%, for natural Uranium in return that has a U-235 concentration of .07%. The only Iran plant that is allowed to to enrich up to 3.76 percent is under constant monitoring 24/7 in real time. These constraints will be lifted in 10 years. Therefore Kerry WAS NOT LYING, if the centrifuges are turned off for 10 years, there is no way for Iran to enrich the Uranium. The chart in the link below sums up the deal, which was backed by America's best scientists. If Iran did not give up anything they would have already had a nuclear weapon. Your source statements contradicts the statements of Allbright, who said Iran must turn on the centrifuges and start enriching again if they want a nuclear weapon. They both can't be right one of them has to be wrong. Allbright is suppose to be taking information from documents that Israel stole.yeah .. i cite wiki u cite wiki whose wiki is the right wiki?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_...Plan_of_Action Originally Posted by adav8s28
yeah Originally Posted by The_Waco_KidYou okay with the Washington Post? It has the same information as the wiki link. If Trump had not backed out of the deal there was no way for Iran to get a nuclear weapon. The 14,000 centrifuges are turned off for now. Hankering's guy Allbright even said so. With Trump backing out, they could turn the centrifuges back on and start the enrichment process again and get back to where they were in 2015, before the deal with Obama.
You okay with the Washington Post? It has the same information as the wiki link. If Trump had not backed out of the deal there was no way for Iran to get a nuclear weapon. The 14,000 centrifuges are turned off for now. Hankering's guy Allbright even said so. With Trump backing out, they could turn the centrifuges back on and start the enrichment process again and get back to where they were in 2015, before the deal with Obama.
https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...ear-deal/1651/ Originally Posted by adav8s28
are you ok with the fact that Iran has CHEATED on years of "inspections"?I don't trust them and neither does the USA. The 13K high speed and low speed centrifuges were turned off and moved to the Natanz nuke plant which is being monitored 24/7 in real time. This is why Trump's CIA director can say with certainty that Iran is compliant with the constraints of the deal. Allbright has read the stolen documents from Israel and has said the same thing, the centrifuges are turned off for now. You and Hankering don't read the links that are provided.
BAHAAA
and you trust them ... why? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid