My side

The original iquit wasn't a troll
Just a miserable guy who only wrote No reviews..that was his thing Originally Posted by Prince Akeem Of Zamunda

In my opinion he is a troll

I guess I'm confused as to whether references were given and checked...
Cam advertises newbie friendly so that, to me, indicates she has alternative screening available but mention was made in this thread regarding the guy giving references.

I did screen him the best I could. I contacted the ref he gave me. It was mentioned that I didn’t contact his ref, by another provider. After this thread blew up, I contacted the ref & sent her a screenshot of a totally diff guy I was asking about & she said she never received it & never received my ph call- that she’d been having issues w/ her ph. When the guy 1st wrote the review on the other site, & I posted my rebuttal, several providers said he’d contacted them as well. 1 girl mentioned he listed bogus info/refs for her. Yes, I’m newbie friendly, BUT, do require alternate screening.

Dammit, for a second there I thought you were addressing me. Originally Posted by boardman

CatDaddy...I love you too...but I can't miss you if you've never left. xoxo NaN and I go wayyyyy back.

CatDaddy...I love you too...but I can't miss you if you've never left. xoxo NaN and I go wayyyyy back. Originally Posted by B Three

I know, I know. My bad, I need to rectify that!

I did screen him the best I could. I contacted the ref he gave me. It was mentioned that I didn’t contact his ref, by another provider. After this thread blew up, I contacted the ref & sent her a screenshot of a totally diff guy I was asking about & she said she never received it & never received my ph call- that she’d been having issues w/ her ph. When the guy 1st wrote the review on the other site, & I posted my rebuttal, several providers said he’d contacted them as well. 1 girl mentioned he listed bogus info/refs for her. Yes, I’m newbie friendly, BUT, do require alternate screening. Originally Posted by Cameron Houston

So you never got a reference before seeing him? Am I misreading that?
It sounds like you found out from others that the guy was a dick only after you found it out on your own.

Well I contacted the reference that he gave me but she wasn’t able to get the car and since she is a very very reputable I went with it on that. Plus I had a friend of mine run his number through a couple of apps and she said she didn’t find any red flags. And the only way that I found out that he had multiple handles on this website, is because he wrote the same review on the other site, But it was deleted because I have a no review policy there. So when I saw the handle that you wrote the review under, I just realize like hey dude has two handles because I searched the other handle he gave me here as well and nothing came up. And I will say he was not mean or disrespectful at all they were just misunderstanding however in the end of the session is when he started to get a little mean. And I won’t even say mean I would just say Rude. He doesn’t pose any physical threat at least he doesn’t come off like that. There was no way for me to know that he had a handle here, until I saw the review, and I just put both together.

Well I contacted the reference that he gave me but she wasn’t able to get the car and since she is a very very reputable I went with it on that. Plus I had a friend of mine run his number through a couple of apps and she said she didn’t find any red flags. And the only way that I found out that he had multiple handles on this website, is because he wrote the same review on the other site, But it was deleted because I have a no review policy there. So when I saw the handle that you wrote the review under, I just realize like hey dude has two handles because I searched the other handle he gave me here as well and nothing came up. And I will say he was not mean or disrespectful at all they were just misunderstanding however in the end of the session is when he started to get a little mean. And I won’t even say mean I would just say Rude. He doesn’t pose any physical threat at least he doesn’t come off like that. There was no way for me to know that he had a handle here, until I saw the review, and I just put two into together.

IMO, he isn;t a safety issue and Cam isn't claiming that...just maybe a little douchey and difficult.

That can be a YMMV issue, not a screening issue.

Much love

In my opinion he is a troll Originally Posted by CurvyKatie

Mine also, that's why he has multiple handles. Banned or not, that's irrelevant at this point ! Its not okay to me because legit guys respect a NO review policy from the site they meet you on. Not trickle on to another site to post a review that has been removed from where you met the lady. This damn thread is still going on, a ladies job is never done. Cameron still has to continue to explain/defend herself... bullshit !

Cameron still has to continue to explain/defend herself... bullshit ! Originally Posted by TexasJess

It is unfortunate that the only place the ladies have to explain their side of a review and the legitimacy of details within a review is within the angry mob of coed.

It is unfortunate that the only place the ladies have to explain their side of a review and the legitimacy of details within a review is within the angry mob of coed. Originally Posted by CurvyKatie

Don't you ladies have a private area?

How would explaining a rebuttal to a review help in the ladies area? The point of the rebuttal is so that it can be viewed by the gentlemen. The ladies are not planning on purchasing a session from Cam.

Or is this question really just rude attempt to tell us ladies to leave coed and go have our discussions elsewhere?

Don't you have a men's locker room?

How would explaining a rebuttal to a review help in the ladies area? The point of the rebuttal is so that it can be viewed by the gentlemen. The ladies are not planning on purchasing a session from Cam.

Or is this question really just rude attempt to tell us ladies to leave coed and go have our discussions elsewhere?

Don't you have a men's locker room? Originally Posted by CurvyKatie

You said coed was the only place to post a rebuttal. I asked a simple question.
Then you get your panties all in a wad because you read some kind of intent into my question that wasn't even there.

As far as the point of posting in Co-ed goes I understand your point but as I said in an earlier post these things usually go off the rails. It happens time and time again.

Here is what I've learned from this thread. It's pretty evident that Cameron didn't screen as thoroughly as she should have. She took an appointment based on a reference that never got back to her. She went ahead anyway. Since he had a reference it doesn't sound like she used alternative screening as she would for a newbie. I don't know if it's a one off nor do I know the reason if it is a one off. That's all her business to do how she pleases. I'm not telling her how to do anything. What I am saying is that depending on who's gleaning what from the information in now over 100 posts it could be good or it could be bad, again depending on which side of the fence you're on and what you're looking to take from it.

Iquit and whatever other handles he has have been banned. We all know the guy will be back. Probably already is. He'll do the same thing to another provider. There seems to be a handful of these guys who keep doing it. I have no idea how to prevent them from getting a new handle. Seems like giving them a false sense of security on the open board and exposing them in a more appropriate private area he doesn't have access to might prevent some of the new handles being created as soon as the old one is exposes. But then that would require discipline none of us has.

That's why a rebuttal in coed needs to be carefully considered. The rebuttal itself is fine, they just usually take an unintended direction. That's the part that needs to be considered. Is the risk tolerable?

Katie, You recently have found yourself in defense mode about a comment you made in another thread. It was an innocent comment that I thought was pretty damned sexy but some fucktards apparently read something into it that wasn't there and you had to do damage control. I think you mentioned that you wished you hadn't ever made the comment.

A provider with an otherwise good reputation and pages of yes reviews should probably let a single bad review roll off their backs. Us gentlemen are smart enough to figure it out. The risk is not worth taking IMHO.

Here's some advice for anyone that wants it, you can take it or leave it. With the exception of those who have proven themselves to be trolls and in the absence of some universally recognized and accepted fonts for such things as a particular emotion, sarcasm or even body language, etc, best practice would be to try not reading any intent beyond what is in black and white on the page. Take what is written for face value. Most likely, the person blindly assigning the intent will get it wrong. This is especially important to remember if you are thin skinned or easily offended.