Segment on local CBS news tonight at 10 on ECCIE

I think everybody in the DFW area probably recognized that provider. It'll either make things a little "hot" with LE... Which I'm hoping not.. Or her business will skyrocket LOL

But I wasn't too impressed with their findings or whatever they were trying to bring to the public's attention with that segment.... Probably some of the same ol' stuff they've been trying to prove and dig up... Yawn.. And on with the ECCIE show! Originally Posted by sweet.treat69
I wonder whose computer they used for the screenshots? It looked like the reporting team did some research...
VIP Mya Michelle's Avatar
So they went with the sex trafficking angle. I think that is stupid, if anything an open review system like here cuts down on traffic and supports the independent provider. Originally Posted by garf12
+1 but that segment scared me a little I feel like going UTR atleast for a while...

UTR meaning p411 only!
Surge's Avatar
  • Surge
  • 04-29-2013, 10:26 PM
*sigh*

That was anticlimactic. Someone gimme a drink... Originally Posted by ~Ze~
Ditto...I'm having to get a drink now...

Surge
That was pretty much a fluff piece. The worst part of it may have been some of the screenshots of providers and other shots of the site. They just talked about how they couldn't shut it down, because it's difficult to prove that what's being done on the site is illegal (that's because the site itself is not illegal). They tried to portray it as "human trafficking" which goes to show you how much they don't know about the site.
r4665's Avatar
  • r4665
  • 04-29-2013, 10:28 PM
From what I got, they did eccie because it was originally from Fort Worth and may still be. It is on the prosecutors radar. They mainly concerned about human trafficing and prostitution compliants. I think everyone should add a disclaimer. TDNRH BIWIT . This did not really happen, but I wanted it to.
Sweet treat, I must see you before they shut this down. Lol. Seriously tough I must see ya. Originally Posted by Whodwho


That was pretty much a fluff piece. The worst part of it may have been some of the screenshots of providers and other shots of the site. They just talked about how they couldn't shut it down, because it's difficult to prove that what's being done on the site is illegal (that's because the site itself is not illegal). They tried to portray it as "human trafficking" which goes to show you how much they don't know about the site. Originally Posted by sooner0010
I agree.. I don't see the site being shut down anytime soon.. The owners can't be contacted.. Nothing can be proven illegal.. All I would suggest is, ladies, screen to no prevail!! And guys, I would stick to verified & reputable girls. I don't think much will change around here.. But that's just my .02
That was pretty much a fluff piece. The worst part of it may have been some of the screenshots of providers and other shots of the site. They just talked about how they couldn't shut it down, because it's difficult to prove that what's being done on the site is illegal (that's because the site itself is not illegal). They tried to portray it as "human trafficking" which goes to show you how much they don't know about the site. Originally Posted by sooner0010
But the owners have disappeared or distanced themselves from the site.

What does that tell us?
Juan Pablo de Marco's Avatar
thanks for the newsflash ray.
Yep! I watched it. Apparently they have no hard-core criminals to worry about? So they want to concern themselves with people who want to have fun and share info.
TinMan's Avatar
Anyone care to take a stab at interpreting SB 94 which was referenced in that story, preferably someone with an actual law degree?
billw1032's Avatar
I liked the interview with State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte. She reminds me of the Rush Limbaugh quote: "feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."
SweetAterPie's Avatar
TW,
I suspect they tired of reading your shit.
Anyone care to take a stab at interpreting SB 94 which was referenced in that story, preferably someone with an actual law degree? Originally Posted by TinMan
Wheres shyster jon?
ManSlut's Avatar
Anyone care to take a stab at interpreting SB 94 which was referenced in that story, preferably someone with an actual law degree? Originally Posted by TinMan
Here is a link TinMan, Click on 'View latest bill text'...In a nutshell it is a Bill recently passed by the State Senate to legally go after sites that promote prostitution or compell (force) the act of prostitution.

http://openstates.org/tx/bills/83/SB94/
ManSlut's Avatar
The definition of compell ranges from 'obliges' to 'force'