LA Voting Rolls Have 144% of the Total Number of Eligible Residents

We are still on voter fraud? Really? The loose cunt cock holster won...

Every serious person conservative and liberal alike agree there was no wide spread voter fraud.

There were some cases, yes. They were discovered and prosecuted.

He is such an embarrassment.

God only knows how badly we wanted there to be wide spread voter fraud discovered because of that.

Unfortunately, he won it fair & square.

Bitching to bitch....petes sake.

Stop pulling sources from bullshitfarwingnutjob.com

We are still on voter fraud? Really? The loose cunt cock holster won...

Every serious person conservative and liberal alike agree there was no wide spread voter fraud.

There were some cases, yes. They were discovered and prosecuted.

He is such an embarrassment.

God only knows how badly we wanted there to be wide spread voter fraud discovered because of that.

Unfortunately, he won it fair & square.

Bitching to bitch....petes sake.

Stop pulling sources from bullshitfarwingnutjob.com Originally Posted by grean

If you'd pull your head out of your boyfriend's crotch for a few seconds you might have noticed the news reports substantiating voter fraud, you lib-retarded jackass.

If you'd pull your head out of your boyfriend's crotch for a few seconds you might have noticed the news reports substantiating voter fraud, you lib-retarded jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I've seen cases of voter fraud.....nothing substantial.

Am I missing something?

The question should be...Is how much voter suppression do we tolerate to counter voter fraud?

Just admit is....these voter fraud laws are just designed to suppress voting.

That is no different than Jim Crow era laws.

We should open up voting to all citizens of this country....not enact laws that suppress voting.

If you'd pull your head out of your boyfriend's crotch for a few seconds you might have noticed the news reports substantiating voter fraud, you lib-retarded jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

As previously said, stop pulling your sources from bullshitrightwingnutjob.com a.k.a judicial watch


Fox news doesn't even try to back stories of massive voter fraud.

Read the wallstreet journal. Read USA today. Listen to NPR and PBS.

Then Listen to fox. Then listen to cnn. Listen to abc & nbc. .

Take everything they all say and throw out the opinions and commentary. Take only the facts. Then make your own opinion.

Wipe your ass with Judicial Watch. TMZ is more reliable.

As previously said, stop pulling your sources from bullshitrightwingnutjob.com a.k.a judicial watch


Fox news doesn't even try to back stories of massive voter fraud.

Read the wallstreet journal. Read USA today. Listen to NPR and PBS.

Then Listen to fox. Then listen to cnn. Listen to abc & nbc. .

Take everything they all say and throw out the opinions and commentary. Take only the facts. Then make your own opinion.

Wipe your ass with Judicial Watch. TMZ is more reliable. Originally Posted by grean

How many court cases has TMZ won, jackass? Judicial Watch is more legitimate than MSNBC, Huffy, Rolling Stone, etc., moron. And Judicial Watch reports stories that WaPo, CNN, and the New York Times don't want people to know about; such as this story reporting how these lib-retard counties have voters registered on its rolls that they can't legitimately justify, you equivocating cock-sucker ... in numbers that could more than account for the margin hildebeest and your ilk keep screeching about, ball-licker. Judicial Watch didn't say there was voter fraud, they said that dim-retard counties have millions of illegitimate voters registered, you cretin. One need only couple that bit of knowledge with knowledge about how dim-retards in California hand out voter's rights like candy to extrapolate that illegals populate California voter rolls in the millions and that either they -- or someone in their name -- are casting ballots for dim-retard candidates, you "#Grubered" hildebeest minon.

Anybody else find IBIdiot to be incredibly abrasive and singularly obnoxious? I mean how many insults can one person cram into a single paragraph ... who isn't the reigning POTUS that is? Unless...

Hey shitheel, why don't you go back to whatever rehab or "adult education program" you were in earlier this summer?

You are the worst waste of bandwidth in ECCIE history.

No wonder you were the original Dipshit of the Year ... and unanimously selected, btw.

The monkey and coconut are back!!!!

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...sleading-court

WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — A federal judge says Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach has demonstrated a pattern of misleading the court about the facts and record in a voting rights case.
U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson refused Tuesday to reconsider a $1,000 fine and order requiring Kobach to submit to a deposition by the American Civil Liberties Union.

A magistrate judge had fined Kobach for misrepresenting the contents of documents he took into a November meeting with then President-elect Donald Trump and a separate draft amendment to the National Voter Registration Act.

Robinson cited three earlier instances where Kobach mischaracterized the record or exhibits. She says sanctions are necessary to deter him from misleading the court in the future.

Kobach is vice chairman of President Donald Trump's Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

How many court cases has TMZ won, jackass?
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

How many cases has JW had thrown out? They throw shit at the wall and hope some of it sticks.

They are not a fucking news source. Fox is more fair and balanced, for Christ's sake.

Don't pay atteion to IBIdiot.

You'll prove him 100% wrong and he'll continue to argue and insult you.

Point out how wrong he is 100 times and he'll post 101 identical posts (with one word changed) insulting you and insisting it's you who are wrong. Again, no proof. No support.

In the early days of this forum, he'd regularly waste dozens of pages on a thread doing just that.

I'm not sure IBIdiot isn't a bot instead of a living breathing person.

Nobody's ever seen him.

His reviews indicate that.

Except for the trannies of course.

If you don't believe me, search the archives. The poster known as IBIdiot is an enigma ... who needs an ENEMA!

How many cases has JW had thrown out? They throw shit at the wall and hope some of it sticks.

They are not a fucking news source. Fox is more fair and balanced, for Christ's sake. Originally Posted by grean

Judicial Watch was at the forefront of uncovering and revealing hildebeest's illicit emails, while CBS, CNN, ABC, MSNBC and NBC were blowing smoke up lib-retard asses such as yours.

Judicial Watch: New hildebeest Emails Produced by State Department; hildebeest Email Shows She Was Concerned About Records

WASHINGTON, DC--(Marketwired - June 27, 2016) - Judicial Watch today released 165 pages of new State Department records that include a previously unreleased March 22, 2009, email of former Secretary of State hildebeest revealing that she was concerned about how her records were being handled and had "no idea how my papers are treated at State. Who manages both my personal and official files?" hildebeest top aide Huma Abedin responds: "We've discussed this" and promises to explain it again. This is the fifth set of records produced to Judicial Watch by the State Department (from the non-"state.gov" email accounts of Huma Abedin) that contain hildebeest emails that were not produced by the State Department as part of the 55,000 pages of emails that hildebeest turned over to the State Department.

These records further appear to contradict statements by hildebeets that, "as far as she knew," all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department even though she turned over no emails dated prior to March 18, 2009. These new records release contain 34 new @clintonemail.com emails that have not been previously produced by to the State Department.

The documents were produced under court order in a May 5, 2015, Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)) for "all emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-"state.gov" email address."

(Yahoo)

IBIDiot on the issues.

Judicial Watch was at the forefront of uncovering and revealing hildebeest's illicit emails, while CBS, CNN, ABC, MSNBC and NBC were blowing smoke up lib-retard asses such as yours.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Nope. FBI looked into. Big nothing burger.

Stupid, Yes. Illegal Nope.

Please try again.

It requires a little math to derive 144% of the number of eligible registered voters listed on the census in Los Angeles County, Little Andy the Nazi Boy, but now that you've admitted you can't handle a little arithmetic, why don't you run along and play on busy freeway on a dark night, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Wrong! Your asinine "interpretation" of that "number" doesn't mean jack shit, Little Hans. Now give me a number that is "certified" by Judicial Watch. Hurry up before your nuts are completely decomposed somewhere, Little Hans.

IMO if I leave one state to another and register to vote in the 2nd state then I should notify the 1st state I moved and no longer will be voting there. If I do that and state #1 doesn't eliminate me from the rolls then that's not on me ... that's on state #1. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Since as i said by the rules its on the state you REGISTER with to notify your former one, its not n you if there's no notification..
THAT SAID< i do feel its a good idea to check in with your former state YOURSELF to notify them you are no longer a resident...

I
Just admit is....these voter fraud laws are just designed to suppress voting. Originally Posted by WTF

WTF. What suppression?? Telling people you need to be a citizen and provide proof before voting? HOW IS THAT suppression?

Nope. FBI looked into. Big nothing burger.

Stupid, Yes. Illegal Nope.

Please try again. Originally Posted by grean

Actually it was highly illegal to move classified information to a unsecured private server at a unsecured location. It was also illegal to destroy government documents that were under a subpoena.It was also illegal to have so many people handling classified material that did not have the security clearance. http://nypost.com/2015/09/27/yes-hil...broke-the-law/