It shows a defecit of intelligence to assume that everybody within a defined group acts and thinks exactly the same ! Originally Posted by WhirlawayWrong again! However, there are those who might believe that it shows a "defecit of intelligence" to incorrectly spell the word deficit! ROTFLMAO
The definition of a "social conservative," according to Wikipedia:
The accepted meaning of traditional morality often differs from group to group within social conservatism.Thus, there are really no policies or positions that could be considered universal among social conservatives. Social Conservatives generally favor the pro-life position in the abortion controversy; oppose all forms of and wish to ban embryonic stem cell research ; oppose both eugenics (inheritable genetic modification) and human enhancement (transhumanism) while supporting bioconservatism;[1] support a definition of marriage as being one man and one woman; view the nuclear family model as society's foundational unit; oppose expansion of civil marriage and child adoption rights to couples in same-sex relationships; promote public morality and traditional family values; oppose secularism and/or privatization of religious belief; support the prohibition of drugs, prostitution, premarital sex, non-marital sex and euthanasia; and support the censorship of pornography and what they consider to be obscenity or indecency.
Whirly, I will say the following with a great degree of certainty. If you are a "social conservative" as you claim, you have no business being a willing participant on an adult hobby board?. On the other hand, if you are not really a "social conservative" while claiming that you are, than I am going to call it like I see it.
Originally Posted by bigtex
You conveniently edited out the key Wiki phrase in the definiton you posted.....which shows how dishonest lefties are...and how far they will go to try to smear those they oppose....I added it in red ! Originally Posted by WhirlawayWhirly, you can run but you can't hide! You either fall in the "social conservative" category as you claim or you're not a "social conservative." When it comes to the adult hobby as it relates to ["public morality, traditional family values, support of prostitution, premarital sex, non-marital sex and supporting the censorship of pornography" and what is generally considered by all (not most) "social conserviatives" to be "obscenity and indecency,"] there is no in between!
Whirly, you can run but you can't hide! You either fall in the "social conservative" category as you claim or you not a "social conservative." When it comes to adult hobbying, prostitution, etc. there is no in between. As long as you are a willing participant on an adult hobby board, you fall in the "not a social conservative" category, just like everyone (myself included) who willingly participates on this board!
At least I admit that I am not a "social conservative!"Originally Posted by bigtex
Based on toe-tapping social conservatives like Larry Craig, and diaper-wearing social conservatives like David Vitter, I'd guess that the definition of 'social conservative' is someone who preaches one thing as a virtue for others while secretly engaging in the opposite when he thinks no one's watching. Originally Posted by TheTexasTornadoAnd given how much time he spends on here, it wouldn't surprise me if the dude is living off welfare. Which, frankly, would probably turn me into a conservative.
Based on toe-tapping social conservatives like Larry Craig, and diaper-wearing social conservatives like David Vitter, I'd guess that the definition of 'social conservative' is someone who preaches one thing as a virtue for others while secretly engaging in the opposite when he thinks no one's watching. Originally Posted by TheTexasTornadoNope! The above is how you define a hypocrite! And before you ask, Whirly also falls in that category!
Whirly, you can run but you can't hide! You either fall in the "social conservative" category as you claim or you're not a "social conservative." When it comes to the adult hobby as it relates to ["public morality, traditional family values, support of prostitution, premarital sex, non-marital sex and supporting the censorship of pornography" and what is generally considered by all (not most) "social conserviatives" to be "obscenity and indecency,"] there is no in between!Bigtex, you presume to define Whirly and tell him who he is? Who gives you that right? Your post represents exactly the type of snobbish, condescending position for which socialist elitists are infamous.
Whirly, the evidence against you is overwhelming and quite frankly there is no gray area. As long as you are a willing participant on an adult hobby board, you fall in the "not a social conservative" category, just like everyone else who willingly is an adult hobby board participant! The mere fact that you wrongly make the claim to be one, does not make you a "social conservative!" By the same token, I can make the claim on this board that I am a millionaire, many times over. But at the end of the day, I still have to pay my fair share of taxes, therefore I must not be a millionaire! Get my drift? Or did that also go over your head?
Before you ask, I promise to not try your deceptive tactics: I will readily admit that I am not a "social conservative!"Originally Posted by bigtex
It shows a defecit of intelligence to assume that everybody within a defined group acts and thinks exactly the same ! Originally Posted by WhirlawayWhile I agree with the statement, although I would have stated it differently, I find it shocking and very hypocritical coming from you. Need I go back and show you the numerous times, in your anti-Obama threads, how many times you lumped all liberals, and/or dems, into thinking or believing a certain way? I B is just as guilty with his favorite term, dimocrats. Anyone using republicans in the same way is just as wrong.
Bigtex, you presume to define Whirly and tell him who he is? Who gives you that right? Your post represents exactly the type of snobbish, condescending position for which socialist elitists are infamous. Originally Posted by I B HankeringI B, what is the definition of socialists elitists? Since you lumped them together for having snobbish, condescending positions, I'd like to know who they are.
I think he's pointing out more of Whirl's hypocrisy. Originally Posted by surcherIn fact, I specifically pointed out Whirly's hypocrisy several times in this thread alone.
First off thank you BigTX for recognizing my 21 reviews, all of Premium AA ass. Originally Posted by WhirlawayIf they were "all of Premium" quality, why did you give 4 of them negative reviews? Or was this yet another example of a Whirly "play on words?"
BigTx, you're delliusonal. Originally Posted by WhirlawayIs "delliusonal" a new word? I was unable to find it in my online dictionary!