ATTN Providers – Most Hobbyists Hate Tattoos

So I totally saw this girl at the laundromat. She was wearing flip flops and her hair in a ponytail, no makeup. CAN YOU BELIEVE she dressed like that at a formal event?? Omg. I'm so glad that the only outfit I was born with can go anywhere.

I have a question for all the guys who say they love tattoos on a girl: Would you ever NOT see a girl because she DIDN'T have any tats? Originally Posted by Gecko

You're really grasping at straws here, aren't you? LOL

The only time I would not see a girl is if it was a bait and switch, she was obviously under the influence, or if there were signs of management.

I like tattoos, but the lack of them will not stop me from seeing a provider. Your best bet is to let this thread quietly fade away...as many have pointed out, your assumption about other hobbyists has made an ass out of you.

I have a question for all the guys who say they love tattoos on a girl: Would you ever NOT see a girl because she DIDN'T have any tats? Originally Posted by Gecko

Now you are starting to intentionally not listen to what posters are telling you.

Many have said it is NOT a show stopper either way. Why are you unwilling to accept that some others do not have the same asthetic preferences as you do?

I suspect this all came about because you saw a lady or two who didn't show her ink in her photos (as she shouldn't in most cases), and were disapointed when you saw them in person. Understandable. Learn from it and ask before setting up an apointment--but don't try and tell the rest of us that we should/shouldn't like tattoos.

@TJ - Go ahead. I'm sure you'll hit a niche market. I'll be there lol.

Originally Posted by Tiffani Jameson

Good one TJ - I think a lot of posters would love that based on the backlash of my original post. There's no bullshit about that tattoo - there's no pretense of being classy or tasteful or appropriate. Here's a surprise - that's the first tattoo I've seen that's actually a turn-on! I might not date a girl with it but I'd still give her a good nasty fuck!

I might not date a girl with it but I'd still give her a good nasty fuck! Originally Posted by Gecko

You probably couldn't even get in her pants, either civvie or provider.

Good one TJ - I think a lot of posters would love that based on the backlash of my original post. There's no bullshit about that tattoo - there's no pretense of being classy or tasteful or appropriate. Here's a surprise - that's the first tattoo I've seen that's actually a turn-on! I might not date a girl with it but I'd still give her a good nasty fuck! Originally Posted by Gecko

So, now you're a liar. Sweet.

The issue of tats, body piercings, hair color, etc are all goverened by the same simple socological rules.

The more one deviates from the social norm (in this case, no tats, at least as far as the US general population is concerned) the more polorized peoples become about that person. Most people will not care if there are no tats. Very few guys will turn away an otherwise attractive girl if she has no tats. They may like tats but will not object if there are none.

As you add tats, (move away from the social norms) the greater the chance a person will approve or dissaprove of the person with tats. The more tats you have, the smaller the population base becomes of people that like it and increases the population base that disapproves.

There are other factors of course. I would suppect the younger the population base the more tolerant of tats they become. The baby boomers who are reaching retirement age are more likely to dissaprove as we grew up in an age when tats were not as popular as they are now. As we die off and the younger generation gets older, tats may very well become less of an issue because it becomes more of the social norm. Older people who warn that the tats will look horrible when the girls get older are wrong. When the young people get old, the old people will be dead and the socal norms will havew changed.

This is true of tats, piercings, wild hair colors, clothing, and more. When I was young, long hair on guys and music choices were big issues. As the social norms change something else will come along.

The bottom line is, the more anyone deviates from the current socal norms the smaller the group of people becomes that approves. As a provider, if your target group is an older generation, as you have more tats, piercing, etc you will cause your customer to become smaller base.

Keep the likes and dislikes of your customer base in mind when you do this stuff. In a business where body image is extremely important it can have a big effect on you.This is VERY generlized and simplified but the principles hold true for every generation

I have 2, and have a fellow friend with lots and she banks lol. Tatts can be sexy or trashy, depends on how good they are. If you look like you just stepped out of a trailor park with faded not well done tatts all over you it looks really bad. Get tastful tatts and it is a turn on Very sexy!!!!

Get tastful tatts Originally Posted by bustyamy

There's a sign for a tattoo parlor: Get Your Tasteful Tattoo Here!!! Best Tat Ever (Until He Went to Prison!!!):

Women are like that brand new Harley being onloaded at the dealership from the factory. They totally fucking awesome but a little extra chrome and paint here and there never hurts a damn thing!!!!!! Bring it on!

LOL Charles !!!

So, now you're a liar. Sweet. Originally Posted by MsElena

Some of you take this stuff just a little too seriously.

The issue of tats, body piercings, hair color, etc are all goverened by the same simple socological rules.

The more one deviates from the social norm (in this case, no tats, at least as far as the US general population is concerned) the more polorized peoples become about that person. Most people will not care if there are no tats. Very few guys will turn away an otherwise attractive girl if she has no tats. They may like tats but will not object if there are none.

As you add tats, (move away from the social norms) the greater the chance a person will approve or dissaprove of the person with tats. The more tats you have, the smaller the population base becomes of people that like it and increases the population base that disapproves.

There are other factors of course. I would suppect the younger the population base the more tolerant of tats they become. The baby boomers who are reaching retirement age are more likely to dissaprove as we grew up in an age when tats were not as popular as they are now. As we die off and the younger generation gets older, tats may very well become less of an issue because it becomes more of the social norm. Older people who warn that the tats will look horrible when the girls get older are wrong. When the young people get old, the old people will be dead and the socal norms will havew changed.

This is true of tats, piercings, wild hair colors, clothing, and more. When I was young, long hair on guys and music choices were big issues. As the social norms change something else will come along.

The bottom line is, the more anyone deviates from the current socal norms the smaller the group of people becomes that approves. As a provider, if your target group is an older generation, as you have more tats, piercing, etc you will cause your customer to become smaller base.

Keep the likes and dislikes of your customer base in mind when you do this stuff. In a business where body image is extremely important it can have a big effect on you.This is VERY generlized and simplified but the principles hold true for every generation Originally Posted by Bubba3452

My god! There IS intellegent life in this universe!