Just "audio recordings" .... just so you'll know... when he posts "recordings" he's only talking about "audio recordings" ?
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Correct....that is wtf the OP brought up. Audio recording. As a Mod at the time told you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LexusLover
Pistolero: Ms. Brown was asking that question of Papi!
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pistolero
CB did not read and/or understand. Papi said I do VOICE recordings.
We have been discussing voice recording. Try reading all the thread and not just a piece of it.
.....
Oh, BTW: since this is about "audio" recording aka "oral" recording ...
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 18.20
Tex. Penal Code § 16.02
Tex. Rules of Evidence Rule 901(b).
Since everyone is speculating it is highly likely that the officer in WTF"s scenario out of the Houston Chronicle to support his legal advice for all the providers to audio record their "clients" ... was NO BILLED by the Grand Jury because the crafty little prostitute was unable to get her "recording" admitted into evidence. These anecdotal examples form no basis for "legal advice."
But it is nice to know that WTF is ADVOCATING recording hobby sessions!
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Once again....why are you mad at the ''crafty little prostitute''.
Because she audio recorded one of your brethren making a bust that her lawyer was able to get the DA to dismiss? Do you not like to see 'crafty little prostitutes , escape that long arm of the law?
You do realize that the crafty little prostitute is not the one trying to get evidence presented to a jury.
She did however....because she audio recorded her session ....get her charges dismissed by the DA.
You were trying to convolute the two. Why was that?
Why were you so hard on the ''Crafty little prostitute" Do you hate all women or just prostitutes?
.