Breaking News....Susan "Rat Face" Rice Had Better "Lawyer Up"

I won't argue that Trump was Russia's choice.

But come on. Just like 90% of our Main Stream Media and various News Pundits, they thought the odds of him actually winning was ZERO. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Can't argue with that.

Trump winning would be like the Texans winning the Super Bowl. There are indeed a couple of diehards that at least pretend it can happen. I thought Jeb Bush would be the next President....and the way Trump is going about foreign policy , Jeb basically is, as are Graham and McCain!

I still want to see the law changed where the President has to show his tax returns so we can see who he/she might be beholden to.


.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/un...mp-associates/


It is now discovered that Susan Rice demanded that any Trump People overheard on these surveillances be unmasked.

This is a Felony.
Originally Posted by Jackie S

Republican and Democratic law makers have reviewed intelligence reports and concluded Rice did not break the law with the unmasking of Trump associates. She was just doing her job protecting the American people.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/intellige...145356439.html

Republican and Democratic law makers have reviewed intelligence reports and concluded Rice did not break the law with the unmasking of Trump associates. She was just doing her job protecting the American people.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/intellige...145356439.html Originally Posted by flghtr65

From your own link, flighty:

"...some GOP lawmakers have sought to make the case that Rice potentially exceeded her authority. 'I believe Susan Rice abused this system and she did it for political purposes,' Republican Sen. Rand Paul said on MSNBC ’s Morning Joe last week. Rice 'needs to be brought in and questioned under oath,' he added."

You're still ducking my simple proposal, which Rand Paul agrees with, flighty. Here it is for the fifth time:

Tell you what - let's have Susan Rice tell us under oath how many times she requested unmasking. Let's ask her to justify each of her requests, ok? If you're so sure there was no politics involved, then let's hear it from the rat's mouth! Originally Posted by lustylad

From your own link, flighty:

"...some GOP lawmakers have sought to make the case that Rice potentially exceeded her authority. 'I believe Susan Rice abused this system and she did it for political purposes,' Republican Sen. Rand Paul said on MSNBC ’s Morning Joe last week. Rice 'needs to be brought in and questioned under oath,' he added."

You're still ducking my simple proposal, which Rand Paul agrees with, flighty. Here it is for the fifth time: Originally Posted by lustylad

Some GOP lawmakers believe this. From the link:

But counter to the president’s view, Rice’s requests were "normal and appropriate" for a national security advisor, one congressional source told CNN. Another said there is "absolutely" no conclusive evidence that Rice did anything wrong or illegal. The network said it spoke with multiple sources in both parties, including congressional aides.

Based on the above Susan Rice should not have to testify. She doesn't need to lawyer up either as the op has suggested. Your question has been answered now.

Some GOP lawmakers believe this. Originally Posted by flghtr65

One day you will recognize the distinction between ...

.. "lawmakers" and "law enforcers"!

I realize it will take time. More than Eccie has in its lifetime.

One day you will recognize the distinction between ...

.. "lawmakers" and "law enforcers"!

I realize it will take time. More than Eccie has in its lifetime. Originally Posted by LexusLover

So says the man who was running in AUSTIN before any of us were in Buster Browns!

So says the "man" who watched them build lake AUSTIN.

So says the mayor of Clarksville!!!

There'll be no charges. She was doing her job. And your SCROTUS is mentally irregular.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

There'll be no charges. She was doing her job. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

+1

There shouldn't be any charges.

Susan Rice lied about:

The Benghazi Video
The existence of chemical weapons in Syria
Unmasking and illegally distributing the name of Donald Trump
and/or his associates

And she did it on national TV...with gusto. I don't understand how you can defend her.

Susan Rice lied about:

The Benghazi Video
The existence of chemical weapons in Syria
Unmasking and illegally distributing the name of Donald Trump
and/or his associates

And she did it on national TV...with gusto. I don't understand how you can defend her. Originally Posted by gnadfly

It's easy to understand how this sites lying liberals can defend the actions of Rice. Look at how they've defended the Clintons and odummer all of these years. They couldn't bear the shame of realizing how they've been #Grubered all of these years by those lying criminals.

Susan Rice lied about:

The Benghazi Video
The existence of chemical weapons in Syria
Unmasking and illegally distributing the name of Donald Trump
and/or his associates

And she did it on national TV...with gusto. I don't understand how you can defend her. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Let me help you understand. I'll take these one at a time.

1. Benghazi Video. The fact is there were demonstrations in the area near Benghazi around the time of the attack. They were simply going by the intelligence that "they had at the time". Bengazi was political because the republicans were trying help Mitt beat Obama. It did not work because Mitt made his 47% comment in that Boston restaurant. Mitt went on to lose to Obama by 5 MILLION Votes!

2. WMD's in Syria. Both Rice and Kerry were talking about the "Declared Stockpile of WMD's". The fact is Syria turned over a ton (2000 lbs) of illegal chemicals. They were not talking about some major in the Syrian Army three levels down from Assad working on the side with Sangerine gas.

3. Republican law makers have stated that Rice did nothing improper with the unmasking of Trump associates. Go read the link in post 107. Not even Ivy Leaguer Lustylad has a counter argument for that.

Let me help you understand. I'll take these one at a time.

1. The fact is there were demonstrations in the area near Benghazi around the time of the attack. They were simply going by the intelligence that "they had at the time". Bengazi was political because the republicans were trying help Mitt beat Obama. It did not work because Mitt made his 47% comment in that Boston restaurant. Mitt went on to lose to Obama by 5 MILLION Votes!

2. WMD's in Syria. Both Rice and Kerry were talking about the "Declared Stockpile of WMD's". The fact is Syria turned over a ton (2000 lbs) of illegal chemicals. They were not talking about some major 3 levels down from Assad working on the side with Sangerine gas.

3. Republican law makers have stated that Rice did nothing improper with the unmasking of Trump associates. Go read the link in post 107. Not even Ivy Leaguer Lustylad has a counter argument for that. Originally Posted by flghtr65

You're a congenital liar, flighty.

hildebeest admitted that the attack in Benghazi had terrorist connections to a select group of confidants even as she was lying to the American people, flighty.

Odumbo, et al, repeatedly lied to the American people when they said that Assad had surrendered his chemical weapons, flighty.

Susan Rice initially said she knew nothing about Americans being unmasked and denied having anything to do with it flighty, she lied, flighty.

And you're lying when you deny all of it, flighty.

You're a congenital liar, flighty.

hildebeest admitted that the attack in Benghazi had terrorist connections to a select group of confidants even as she was lying to the American people, flighty.

Odumbo, et al, repeatedly lied to the American people when they said that Assad had surrendered his chemical weapons, flighty.

Susan Rice initially said she knew nothing about Americans being unmasked and denied having anything to do with it flighty, she lied, flighty.

And you're lying when you deny all of it, flighty.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Instead of admitting that something is true, you just leave it out.

The facts are:

1. There were demonstrations in the area near Benghazi at the time of the attack.

2. Go watch the Kerry Video in this thead. He was talking about the "Declared Stockpile of WMD's. The fact is Syria did turn over 2000 lbs of illegal chemicals. You won't say this a false statement. You just won't talk about it at all.

3. You should go read the link in Post #107. Republican lawmakers (that are on your side politically) have stated that Rice did not do anything improper with the "Unmasking" of Trump associates. The link is pretty clear about that.

Susan Rice lied about:

The Benghazi Video
The existence of chemical weapons in Syria
Unmasking and illegally distributing the name of Donald Trump
and/or his associates

And she did it on national TV...with gusto. I don't understand how you can defend her. Originally Posted by gnadfly

He can defend her because he is a blindly partisan political hack who gobbles up every narrative he is spoon-fed by the DNC and is utterly incapable of independent critical thinking. Flighty doesn't have a reasonable, impartial, non-partisan bone in his entire body. He will never call a liar a liar if there is a D after the liar's name.

Go read the link in post 107. Not even Ivy Leaguer Lustylad has a counter argument for that. Originally Posted by flghtr65

The fact that I deem your hackish bullshit unworthy of immediate response does not in any way mean I don't have a counter-argument. It just means your bullshit is so hackish and deluded that it's not worth engaging.

The fact that I deem your hackish bullshit unworthy of immediate response does not in any way mean I don't have a counter-argument. It just means your bullshit is so hackish and deluded that it's not worth engaging. Originally Posted by lustylad

Why did you bother to enter post #108?

The fact is clownboy, is that I can find just as many republican lawmakers who feel she did not do anything wrong or illegal with the unmasking of Trump associates as you can find that think potentially she made have done something wrong.

You and Hankering have one thing in common, you both hate to lose an argument.

Why did you bother to enter post #108?

The fact is clownboy, is that I can find just as many republican lawmakers who feel she did not do anything wrong or illegal with the unmasking of Trump associates as you can find that think potentially she made have done something wrong.

You and Hankering have one thing in common, you both hate to lose an argument. Originally Posted by flghtr65

and you have yet to win one.