Any Bankers Here? Please Comment On What a FARCE the Trump Trial Is!!

as someone who claims to have an accounting degree from an Ivy League school did you skip the class on asset valuation? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

What would my accounting degree have to do with valuation methods? I learned valuations in finance and not accounting. Just FYI, if you want to try to be slick with me about what I know, at least know what you are talking about so I can take you somewhat seriously.

You really should watch and listen to folks other than idiots like Fucker Carlson so that you can make more sense in the future.

Anyway, I've already addressed the topic. My education and degrees have nothing to do with the topic; so, play time with someone who does not know the difference between accounting and finance is over for now.

What would my accounting degree have to do with valuation methods? I learned valuations in finance and not accounting. Just FYI, if you want to try to be slick with me about what I know, at least know what you are talking about so I can take you somewhat seriously.

You really should watch and listen to folks other than idiots like Fucker Carlson so that you can make more sense in the future.

Anyway, I've already addressed the topic. My education and degrees have nothing to do with the topic; so, play time with someone who does not know the difference between accounting and finance is over for now. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

so you don't know what you are talking about. thanks for clearing that up.

it was "proven" by summary judgement by a retard leftist judge and a prosecutor with an agenda.


once again .. who where the victims?



even democrats see this as a political farce. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Was Trump’s apartment 10,000 sqft or 30,000? I'm sure that's easy enough to determine. If it's 10,000 he lied by 300% to increase the value of the property. Summary judgment rather than trial would surely be proper in determining that, right?

Were some of his properties rent controlled? If they were the income from those units is easily determined, correct? If he stated the value of the income as “true market rate” rather than the actual rent controlled income as a means of increasing the property value, surely that's obviously inaccurate, right? Summary judgment rather than trial would be the proper method of disposing of that issue, correct?

You may have exceed rational limits in the amount of "ifs" used in a rationalization.

Was Trump’s apartment 10,000 sqft or 30,000? I'm sure that's easy enough to determine. If it's 10,000 he lied by 300% to increase the value of the property. Summary judgment rather than trial would surely be proper in determining that, right?

Were some of his properties rent controlled? If they were the income from those units is easily determined, correct? If he stated the value of the income as “true market rate” rather than the actual rent controlled income as a means of increasing the property value, surely that's obviously inaccurate, right? Summary judgment rather than trial would be the proper method of disposing of that issue, correct? Originally Posted by 1blackman1

once again .. who where the victims?
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

This shows you have no understanding of the issues of this case. This was a civil case, not
a criminal case.

You must never have taken out a bank loan.

You may have exceed rational limits in the amount of "ifs" used in a rationalization. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Yet you provided no answers to the simple questions posed.

Again, a discussion has devolved into idiocy.

The loony MAGAs think that if they yell and scream enough, Trump will not have stolen hundreds of millions from the banks over the years. He would not have sexually assaulted anyone. He wouldn’t have had to pick his own electors. And he damned sure would never have told the mob to fight like hell and go to the Capitol.

Yet here we are. He did and MAGAs still don’t accept it.

No use debating with a rock.

The size and the scope and the long time period the fraud went on are all enormous.


Plus no contrition by Mr. Trump. Only lies and anger. These all played a part in the judgement amount.

Good riddance. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Thanks, 1b1... this one's for you... an update on the outrageous Engeron-James kangaroo trialf verdict, which is being appealed.

It's not looking good for those far-left reprobates (like Letitia James and Arthur Engeron) who are hell-bent on twisting, abusing and weaponizing the legal system to seize assets & businesses owned by their political opponents.


New Doubts About Trump’s Fraud Verdict

Appellate judges say New York Attorney General Letitia James may have exceeded her legal authority.

By Editorial Board
Sept. 29, 2024 3:50 pm ET


The Democratic Party’s lawfare strategy to defeat Donald Trump took another blow last week, not that it received much media attention. Three prosecutions have already hit snags, and now a New York appellate court has expressed considerable doubt about Attorney General Letitia James’s $489 million fraud prosecution and verdict.

A five-judge appellate panel on Thursday heard Mr. Trump’s appeal of a lower-court judge’s penalty for allegedly inflating the value of his real-estate assets to obtain better loan terms. Ms. James’s lawsuit was unusual since nobody claimed to be harmed by the former President’s alleged legerdemain, which is ordinarily required in fraud cases.

Several appellate judges noted as much. “I’m sorry, what’s being described sounds an awful lot like a potential commercial dispute between private actors,” Justice John Higgitt noted. It seems, he mused, that the AG is “going into an area that wasn’t intended for her jurisdiction.” He suggested the court may need to impose “guardrails” on the AG’s power.

Justice David Friedman concurred: “You’ve got two really sophisticated parties in which no one lost any money.” Prior cases brought under the state civil fraud law involved corporate actions with large numbers of putative victims, such as banks bilking customers. “You don’t have anything like that here,” Justice Friedman said.

“There has to be some limitation on what the Attorney General can do in interfering in these private transactions where people don’t claim harm,” said Justice Peter Moulton. He added that “the immense penalty in this case is troubling” given that the “parties left these transactions happy about how things went down.”

Ms. James literally campaigned for her office on a pledge to prosecute Mr. Trump for something. Her method is select an unpopular target first, then look for evidence to file charges. Trial Judge Arthur Engoron also allowed some highly dubious estimates of Mr. Trump’s allegedly ill-gotten gains.

The job of appellate courts is to take a detached look at how the law is applied to protect due process, especially for politically unpopular defendants. Doing so in this case is crucial for the rule of law and future defendants in New York state.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/new-doub...dges-3e0a999e?