Face to Face w/WW/FT...Satan

Nope. But I used to drink Evian water....(spell it backwards)....

Now they have Smartwater so I am trying to correct my deficiencies.

I've tried to stick with "plain water" ...

Besides, he only makes audio recordings, which are ineffective as admissible evidence and hardly worth 50 pages of bullshit. !

? Originally Posted by LexusLover

https://expertpages.com/news/sound_r...s_evidence.htm
FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 901 (A) PROVIDES in general terms that the requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to the admissibility of evidence is satisfied by proffered proof sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims it to be. A foundation for authentication of sound recordings was established in the federal courts in United States v. McKeever,*1* and upheld in cases such as United States v. McMillan.*2* In McMillan the court ruled that where a government agent testified that he heard the voice .of an informant at all times when he was making a recording of a telephone conversation, that this part of the conversation was accurate, and that immediately after the telephone calls were completed, a tape was replayed by the agent in the informant's presence to verify that the conversation had in fact been recorded and that the instruments were operating correctly, it was sufficiently established that the recordings were true and accurate as a basis for their admission in evidence.
In United States v. Kandiel,*3* the court ruled that any question concerning the credibility of a witness who identifies voices on a tape recording admitted into evidence simply goes to the weight which the jury accords the evidence, not its admissibility

I've tried to stick with "plain water" ... Originally Posted by LexusLover

... and I also have WTF on ignore for the same reason.

Contamination is not good.

WTF is a lawyer now, too?

Seems he has his finger on the pulse of the "expertpages" database...

He found it while perusing the "escortpages" database.

Why was WTF banned for a year for again? He keeps dodging that

WTF is a lawyer now, too?

Why was WTF banned for a year for again? Originally Posted by TryWeakly

It should have been for giving legal advice and opinions.

Barratry is a crime, you know. And holding oneself out as a lawyer is also in Texas. So also if he gives legal advice by giving his opinion of what "the law" says .... and he does it all the time.

Texas Penal Code § Sec. 38.122.
FALSELY HOLDING ONESELF OUT AS A LAWYER
Third degree felony

Let's try this again.

Clearly, .....whoever showed up at your door and displeased you....needs to be identified right here and now by the alias handle user name burner number...whatever.....was used to gain entry.

That's what this site is about and the tricks can hear it too because some book gang bangs....share utr girls...etc.

Come on....post it UITB.

Let's try this again.

Clearly, .....whoever showed up at your door and displeased you....needs to be identified right here and now by the alias handle user name burner number...whatever.....was used to gain entry.

That's what this site is about and the tricks can hear it too because some book gang bangs....share utr girls...etc.

Come on....post it UITB. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

And the tricks need to know also if the accusation is legit. Or is this fake drama.

Not to be confused with fake news!

Come on OP.... or else we can all just assume that you are a faker.. .. cry wolf.....whatever...

Otherswise, posting it would garner you more credibility points...

And the tricks need to know also if the accusation is legit. Or is this fake drama. Originally Posted by LexusLover

LL makes a good point.

Irrelevant to me....but not for all.

On the other hand she would be difficult to miss ....

.... see what I'm saying?

The 13% Rule: 170 + (170 x .13) = Estimate of actual weight.

195 is a pretty good sized "speed bump"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Lmao

... and I also have WTF on ignore for the same reason.

Contamination is not good. Originally Posted by LexusLover

So you have me on ignore but post about me nonstop.



You realize that you have a distorted post about me in your Sig line?

WTF is a lawyer now, too?

Seems he has his finger on the pulse of the "expertpages" database...

He found it while perusing the "escortpages" database.

Why was WTF banned for a year for again? He keeps dodging that Originally Posted by TryWeakly

I haven't dodged it....I've answered it every 100 times I've seen you ask it. I've said I can not give a proper version of exactly why because it top secret.

Seems like every time I slap the lie(s) out of you , you bring up my banning , why is that? Is that your go to move when looking like a stalker during a debate?

It should have been for giving legal advice and opinions.

Barratry is a crime, you know. And holding oneself out as a lawyer is also in Texas. So also if he gives legal advice by giving his opinion of what "the law" says .... and he does it all the time.

Texas Penal Code § Sec. 38.122.
FALSELY HOLDING ONESELF OUT AS A LAWYER
Third degree felony Originally Posted by LexusLover

So our resident Snitch is now accusing me of holding myself out as a lawyer.....hmmmm, why don't you report me to your buddy Officer Roscoe? Isn't he who the ladies are supposed to contact to vouch for you?

Lmao Originally Posted by Amiliah Rayne

That mention is not a violation of your own rule is it?

AR, please forgive WTF. He's got a bad case of the ButtHurt and is trying to turn providers against me so they won't see me. He's tried in the past to paint me as LE, tried again recently, and now has settled on merely claiming I'm an LE "snitch."

Whatever that is? Sounds more like "Cockblocking"?

I'm sure your screening devices and techniques will reveal that he's FULL OF SHIT and just being ButtHurt ... and probably the chit-chat in the various ladies' gossip forums will confirm the results of your thorough vetting!

Now back to the thread topic ... speaking of "vetting"!

How the hell does a provider with good screening/vetting skills fail to catch that a potential customer is WW?

That's almost as dumb as WTF claiming I'm an LE snitch!

Almost.

What have I lied about WTF?

What have I lied about WTF? Originally Posted by TryWeakly

You have lied by omission and have not informed LexusLover that you changed a quote of mine in which he thinks I said I fucked his Mother and Sister.

That is the first one off the top of my head. Would you like to admit to him the truth now or continue to lie by omission?



.