Fox preys on the ignorant the good ole left wing battle cry if you are not inline with their beliefs or views you are ignorant. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30Good luck, it is like trying to have an argument with a dirt clod. I'm out
Yeah you are correct, he didn't but many have in historic recollections. Sorry that it bothers you so much. Guess I shouldn't have changed the spelling from ASPD days.Nope i recommend the brisket at Franklins. What is your point again? Do you realize how much like Wyldeman you're beginning to sound?
Say, are you the guy who always recommends the brisket at Rudy's in every BBQ thread? My, what exquisite taste you have. Originally Posted by Billy_Saul
Fox preys on the ignorant the good ole left wing battle cry if you are not inline with their beliefs or views you are ignorant. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30Actually that's not what anybody here is saying, bubba. IGNORANT means you DON'T KNOW. And by the conversation, the supporting evidence and poorly constructed syllogisms throughout your foray into this thread, you DON'T KNOW!
Actually that's not what anybody here is saying, bubba. IGNORANT means you DON'T KNOW. And by the conversation, the supporting evidence and poorly constructed syllogisms throughout your foray into this thread, you DON'T KNOW!I do not agree with most of what you say and I am sure I can say that goes both ways. That is just fine with me and I have never called you ignorant either. Just because you and others that believe the same as you do does not make me ignorant or others ignorant. Your perception has been the same throughout with anyone that disagrees with you.
Where is the proof of what I do not Know?? I think just maybe you Don't Know. Would that then prove that you are ignorant?
Why you don't know isn't my business. Not my problem. But numerous people in this and other threads have proven that you are IGNORANT. That means you haven't studied the issue. You haven't read up on the things you're saying. You haven't found anybody but YOU who can corroborate your claims.
Nobody has proven in this or other threads that I am ignorant. If I was to believe that I would call myself ignorant. What you have dug up or found could also be considered as hearsay..So corroboration could also be argued as not reliable.
THAT'S IGNORANCE.
So is ignorance arguing with someone who you think is ignorant or the person arguing with you that you think is ignorant?
You don't have to agree. This is America. You're entitled to your opinion. But don't think you can get by in a debate by simply shouting louder than the other guy. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
The kid's out of his leaugue and the points being made are clearly going over his head. I would recommend leaving him alone to raise the level of this debate. Child like arguments are uninteresting. Originally Posted by Smokin JoeBest part? He's attempting to debate(?) an article that he wont even take the time to read.