You either lied or you're just wrong. You said that no one had offered an argument that was not religious or philosophical against gay marriage. I proved otherwise with two arguments.
So you just have to admit that you had no idea and were wrong or you can admit that you lied. There really is no third choice. Time for you to retire from whatever basement cubical in the White House that you occupy.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I'm neither, you just can't accept the facts....... let's break this down shall we.
In your first argument you proposed, you said gay marriage should be the will of the people.......... that would be what the people think and BELIEVE to be correct........... which would be philosophical. You lose!
Since you are having trouble with the big words, I figured I'd add this to help you out.
Definition of PHILOSOPHICAL for Kids. 1. : of or relating to the study of basic ideas about knowledge, right and wrong, reasoning, and the value of things. 2. : showing wisdom and calm when faced with misfortune.
The second argument you try to make but didn't make at all rendering it null and void. Was that the state is involved in marriage due to aspects you claimed only existed in a marriage between a man and a woman, taxes, inheritance, the existence of children in the marriage (which you tried to word so as to exclude gay marriage having it). I proved all of those things you sited do indeed exist in a gay marriage. So either you do not BELIEVE they exist in a gay marriage, or you are too stupid to see that they do, either way it negates the point with which you tried to argue. Once again you LOSE!
Again, walk away Judy, just walk away!