Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws

Just like I thought. You've got nothing. Originally Posted by joe bloe

yeah, Ive got nothing but the Obama tape that fox edited and youre too chickenshit to watch or comment on


or do I need to be specific and provide your lazy ass with a link to the thread

yeah, Ive got nothing but the Obama tape that fox edited and youre too chickenshit to watch or comment on


or do I need to be specific and provide your lazy ass with a link to the thread Originally Posted by CJ7

Nothing.

Nothing. Originally Posted by joe bloe

idiot

Sorry, but no.



There are 2 different videos, Einstein. The other video is a video from 9/28/11 and has the politico quote. Or, should i say, has the politico partial quote.

Now quit making a fool of yourself. Originally Posted by Doove

Doofus and CBJ7, your dumb asses are STILL wrong. This Times article (below), dated the same as the video, is from March 28 2011 where Odumbo said:

Obama rules out back-door legalization of immigrants

The Washington Times Monday, March 28, 2011


“There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply, through executive order, ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as president.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/28/obama-rules-out-back-door-legalization-of-immigran/

The Politico article (same as the Times article below) is dated September 28, 2011, where Odumbo said:

Obama defends handling of illegal immigration

The Washington Times Wednesday, September 28, 2011


“This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is not true,” Obama told Hispanic journalists at an “Open for Questions” White House roundtable. “The fact of the matter is there are laws on the books I have to enforce.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/28/obama-defends-his-administrations-handling-of-ille/

And your dumb ass is STILL ignoring Articles I and II of the Constitution!

proving or providing details means exactly jack shit to you and idiots like IB ... you seem really quick to ask for proof but NEVER attempt to disprove anything ... you pit your opinion against facts (all day yesterday) and you say Ive got nothing.


specifically, youre excused, and take I(diot)B with you. Originally Posted by CJ7

CBJ7, you and Doofus have done nothing but dissemble and equivocate on this issue. You have nothing, and your sophistry has proved nothing. Now both of you go to your corners and read the Constitution, because you are sure as hell two ignorant Mo-Fo's on which branch has what powers.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=478382

idiot Originally Posted by CJ7

Nothing

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=478382 Originally Posted by CJ7

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=109

idiot Originally Posted by CJ7

I know you are, but what am I? I'm rubber. You're glue....

IB Hankering,

Please note....

THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT VIDEOS FROM 2 DIFFERENT DATES.

One video shows the politico quote being taken out of context by politico (and Fox). Please learn to keep up.

Obama said he was not allowed to stop enforcing the law in precisely the way that he did. You still are still not addressing the question.

Was Obama wrong to say that he didn't have the authority to stop enforcing the law or did he wrongfully stop enforcing the law. He can't be right in both cases. They are mutually exclusive. He was either wrong when he said he couldn't do it, or he was wrong when did it. Which is it? Originally Posted by joe bloe

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=478382


based on an edited tape you continue to contend Obie did what he said he couldnt do ... the above link disproves that without a doubt

you continue to contend the exec order isnt constitutional

I continue to prove it is ... whithot a doubt.

you continue to contend the exec order is illegal

I continue to prove it isnt


all you have done is contend this and that based on your opinion and an edited tape ... not once have you offered a single shread of proof that supports your opinion/s ... sooo in the mind of a moron you further contend I have nothing.

The End.

Really, CBJ7? You're done here?

:gr oupwave:



Uh, sorry to see you go. I hope no one hurt your feelings.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=478382


based on an edited tape you continue to contend Obie did what he said he couldnt do ... the above link disproves that without a doubt

you continue to contend the exec order isnt constitutional

I continue to prove it is ... whithot a doubt.

you continue to contend the exec order is illegal

I continue to prove it isnt


all you have done is contend this and that based on your opinion and an edited tape ... not once have you offered a single shread of proof that supports your opinion/s ... sooo in the mind of a moron you further contend I have nothing.

The End. Originally Posted by CJ7

No, actually you got carried away and said that Bush 41, Bush 43, and Reagan had done the same thing as Obama, and I called you on it. Since the allegation was based on NOTHING you were backed into a corner, which is where you remain.

No, actually you got carried away and said that Bush 41, Bush 43, and Reagan had done the same thing as Obama, and I called you on it. Since the allegation was based on NOTHING you were backed into a corner, which is where you remain. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Actually, i think the video that you and IB Hankering continue to ignore has a piece showing where Bush 43 did it.

Not that facts matter to you.

IB Hankering,

Please note....

THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT VIDEOS FROM 2 DIFFERENT DATES.

One video shows the politico quote being taken out of context by politico (and Fox). Please learn to keep up. Originally Posted by Doove

Doofus, you're the one blogging about two videos. Both quotes are printed in separate issues of the Washington Times; they are not out of context, jackass.

And your dumb ass is STILL ignoring Articles I and II of the Constitution!

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=478382


based on an edited tape you continue to contend Obie did what he said he couldnt do ... the above link disproves that without a doubt

you continue to contend the exec order isnt constitutional

I continue to prove it is ... whithot a doubt.

you continue to contend the exec order is illegal

I continue to prove it isnt


all you have done is contend this and that based on your opinion and an edited tape ... not once have you offered a single shread of proof that supports your opinion/s ... sooo in the mind of a moron you further contend I have nothing.

The End. Originally Posted by CJ7

And your dumb ass is also STILL ignoring Articles I and II of the Constitution!