There is a good reason why . . .

Gone into thin air? Originally Posted by stuckinsyracuse

For the record this was about a post in this thread that disappeared and not meaning Chloe was gone...just her post. Was confused how that happened

she deleted the post herself..

Yup, she sounded dumb in it, I should have quoted her in my response

Anita

That's what I figured. I tried to delete my own. Thought we couldn't...oh well. Thanks for the explanation

you can within the hour..after that..your outa luck...and your very welcome..

hmmm..but i could be wrong...thats weird..i have been wrong 2 times this year..yikes..
id better get with the program!!

LOL really that is the handle the other mods gave me "deerhunter" but I apologize for spelling your handle wrong because that is the most important fact here, not that you allowed a photo of me to be posted and mocked in that private room that does not exist and you don't moderate.

Roscoe it's hooktard and I left my hooktard spellchecker in the same spot you left any shred of decency you have.

Let it be known ladies, these are the men that stand by and condone outing by making fun of my situation. Originally Posted by chloegiggles

Thanks GP

you can within the hour..after that..your outa luck...and your very welcome..

hmmm..but i could be wrong...thats weird..i have been wrong 2 times this year..yikes..
id better get with the program!! Originally Posted by anita germane

That's INSANE... I've read you are still on the program.
(at least when you're not throwing down bacon cheeseburgers)

Originally Posted by GP

I don't see any forest there!!
(just a pile of clothes next to a buff lady -or is it a lady in the buff?)

now my point is STOP! PLEASE STOP HARASSING ME!

I am sure none of you are set up military style at your front door ready to defend your home tonight like I am. I challenge you to come face me right now coward I am sitting here waiting. . . .and yes I just saw you in your car. Originally Posted by chloegiggles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh2dZWH762w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=potNR-wW-iY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvIwfXU-t_Y

Rockwell___Somebody's_watching _me

Geez, just let the storm pass, and let_it_be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXXfRFPCX8I

Heh Dove, you completely missed it again dude. Originally Posted by Wakeuр

'Bout the only thing i've missed is your posting of the rule that you're relying on in suggesting Chloe should be banned. Seems i'm not the only one.

I'm sure the OP will sleep better at night BB knowing punishment has been doled out. The OP only ever wanted the person punished who gave out private information about her...now on to other matters and other punishments to be given out I guess...kind of ironic... Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Looks like Make-up got punked. By, what he would call, a "hooktard". Kind of ironic.

This is a lie. Period. Assuming she is talking about the 4 Upstate NY Mods, of course (and I think that is a safe assumption). Originally Posted by rooster69

Rooster, you really shouldn't claim something is a lie, then qualify it by suggesting it depends on whether or not there's something you don't know, then berate me for commenting on things while claiming i don't have the full story. It's bad form.

Doove.... ya' really need to give this a rest, my friend. I have a lot of respect for you

And i, you.

and I am probably taking a risk by calling you out a bit here.

Why would you say that? If you disagree with me on something, out with it.

But it needs to be said. You have no PA and do not know all of the facts and all of the background (unless someone is feeding you "private" info! ). I know that you have good intentions. But you are basing your comments in part on information given to you by a notoriously unreliable and biased witness. For those that know most of the facts, she is making you look kinda clueless.

I would suggest you go back and re-read my postings in the 2 threads. A few tangential comments to Jack and Anita notwithstanding, the bulk of my posts have dealt strictly with whether or not Chloe did something that rises to the level of her deserving to be banned. I'm a little curious as to what info you think i'm lacking that could impact my interpretation of forum rule #20.

GET ON WITH YOUR LIVES, PEOPLE! Enough.

Good advice on it's face. But in my case, that would simply mean my going back to the National Sandbox. So...well....six of one/half dozen of the other, i suppose.

Doove, please stop typing with your toe's Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

When you stop talking with marbles in your mouth.

checkmate my ass

mmmm so you found a few threads in Houston to support your theory.

go back to Houston. (Supreme Directive) now search on that. All I know can be found in Houston as from a few posts I made there. Then was said by a Houston member Ban OSD. Links can also be found in ask the mods upset ny for links to Houston. I as op. your ignoring history, doomed to repeat. But in this case upset doomed to repeat for Houston. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

OSD, i have no idea what you're talkin' about. So just stop.