Who Leaked The Supreme Court Draft?

From October 2015 to May 2016, the Washington Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on "multiple candidates" during the 2016 presidential election, including Donald Trump. The Free Beacon stopped funding this research when Donald Trump had clinched the Republican nomination.[9] Fusion GPS would later hire former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and produce a dossier alleging links between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Paul Singer, a billionaire and hedge fund manager, who is a major donor to the Free Beacon, said he was unaware of this dossier until it was published by BuzzFeed News in January 2017.[10] On October 27, 2017, the Free Beacon publicly disclosed that it had hired Fusion GPS, and stated that it "had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele."[11]





poor little precious b blind and dumb as can be.



BAHHHHAAHHAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Now didn't we discuss that a condoning attitude is not a substitute for the truth?

Nowhere in your link/quote does it show your hot girlfriend hilly posting funds early/mid 2015.
Check it again.
You dance like your feet are both left not supplying proof of earlier date.

Until than, keep doing what you do best

... You're losing your credibility with each passing day, Preece.

#### Salty

The dossier, leaked by BuzzFeed News in January 2017,[12] without its author's permission,[13][14][15][16][17] is an unfinished 35-page compilation of raw intelligence[18][19] based on information from anonymous sources known to the author, counterintelligence specialist[20] Christopher Steele.[21] Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6), was writing the report for the private investigative firm Fusion GPS, who were paid by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).[22] The dossier's 17 reports allege that Trump campaign members and Russian operatives had conspired to cooperate in Russia's election interference to benefit Trump.[23] It also alleges that Russia sought to damage Hillary Clinton's candidacy.[24] BuzzFeed's decision to publish the reports without verifying their allegations was criticized by journalists[25][26] and defended by a court ruling.[27]



BAAHHHHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Tsk. Tsk.
Still can't read.
Again, I state:

Nasty habit y'all have of quoting out of context.
Maybe if you'd read the whole thing you wouldn't be so confused.



I only state the Steele Dossier started with the initial monies from those of donnys party. Your buddies won't supply proof that Hilly put up the cash first. That makes them extremely butthurt. They just gotta learn to

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Boy you sucking so hard that it's going in one hole and out the other. Good job!

Tsk. Tsk.
Still can't read.
Again, I state:



Boy you sucking so hard that it's going in one hole and out the other. Good job!

Originally Posted by Precious_b

why u so uppity bro? becuz u wrong or becuz the pee tape is a fiction? or both?


babahahahhhaaaaaaaaa

... You're losing your credibility with each passing day, Preece.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Maybe you can do what the other can't to squash my credibility: prove that y'alls girl Hilly beat Singer to Fusion with the cash.

Until than,

Maybe you can do what the other can't to squash my credibility: prove that y'alls girl Hilly beat Singer to Fusion with the cash.

Until than,
Originally Posted by Precious_b

to lose credibility, one must first have credibility



bahahahhaaaaa

why u so uppity bro? becuz u wrong or becuz the pee tape is a fiction? or both?


babahahahhhaaaaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Just politely responding, unlike others.

You still haven't proved me wrong by showing your girl Hilly beat Singer to the punch. Still waiting.

As i said that would be a guilty pleasure to see a leak of a leak and the grief it cause.

Be happy to entertain at great breadth and depth questions you have after you supply proof to shut me up that the libbys paid Fusion first for that opp research.

to lose credibility, one must first have credibility



bahahahhaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I've showed it. With links/words/pictures.

Show us you have credibility and prove me wrong with a cancelled check by Hilly to Fusion that predates y'alls boy.

Just politely responding, unlike others.

You still haven't proved me wrong by showing your girl Hilly beat Singer to the punch. Still waiting.

As i said that would be a guilty pleasure to see a leak of a leak and the grief it cause.

Be happy to entertain at great breadth and depth questions you have after you supply proof to shut me up that the libbys paid Fusion first for that opp research. Originally Posted by Precious_b

i have easily proven you wrong. you are just being a stubborn troll about it.

i'll give you another task since you can't show Republicans paid for the Steele dossier.

this should be easy. show me all the items in the dossier that have been verified as true.


easy, right?


bahahahahhaaaaaaaaaa

i have easily proven you wrong. you are just being a stubborn troll about it.

i'll give you another task since you can't show Republicans paid for the Steele dossier.

this should be easy. show me all the items in the dossier that have been verified as true.


easy, right?


bahahahahhaaaaaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

You never supplied proof that any libby/libtard/democrat/etc. paid Fusion before one of your guys did. So, you didn't prove me wrong.
To refresh your memory AGAIN, the initial monies that started Fusion to research the Big Cheato started with one of your guys and this project eventually lead to Fusion tapping....DRUM ROLL....the Steele Dossier.

Correcting someone ad nauseam is not trolling. Trolling is continually whining, pouting, crying, lying about something you can't prove is wrong. Just supply a source that shows a credit card statement, cancelled check, cash receipt, etc. that pre-dates your pals and you shall be vindicated. We all have been waiting SOOOO LOOOONNNNGGGGG for you to supply it.

As I said before, i'll be happy to entertain questions at great length AFTER you prove your point with the financial trail predating Singers initiation of the Opp Research on donny.

EXPLAINER: Why stakes are high in trial tied to Russia probe


https://apnews.com/article/trump-rus...48f4f7da7865af

Case 1:21-cr-00582-CRC Document 1 Filed 09/16/21

Jurors will not be asked to decide whether the Trump campaign coordinated with the Kremlin to tip the outcome of the race. . . . the trial will rewind the clock to a frenetic stretch in recent American history when the FBI was scrambling to investigate ties between Trump and Russia — and the rival Clinton campaign was eager to push its own suspicions.



The indictment accuses Sussmann of misleading the FBI by denying that he was representing any particular client during the meeting when he was actually acting on behalf of two clients: the Clinton campaign and a technology executive who had helped assemble the computer data.


They also have argued that allowing the case to proceed could have the effect of discouraging tipsters from reporting suspicions or potential wrongdoing to the FBI if they fear their motivations or possible political biases would be scrutinized.

In 2020, a former FBI lawyer named Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to altering an email related to secret FBI surveillance of an ex-Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page. In applying for warrants to eavesdrop on Page, the FBI relied on a dossier of anti-Trump research known colloquially as the “Steele dossier” that contained rumors and uncorroborated claims.

Last year, Durham charged a Russia analyst who was a source for that dossier with lying to the FBI about his own sources of information — among them, a longtime Hillary Clinton supporter. Igor Danchenko has pleaded not guilty. The case is pending and set for trial in October.

sounds like the punditry want to muzzle the tipsters and whistleblowers.


their argument is terrible.

EXPLAINER: Why stakes are high in trial tied to Russia probe


https://apnews.com/article/trump-rus...48f4f7da7865af

Case 1:21-cr-00582-CRC Document 1 Filed 09/16/21 Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Thought the Mueller report showed he was too stupid to go in with Russia for election.

Thought the Mueller report showed he was too stupid to go in with Russia for election. Originally Posted by Precious_b

.
the republicans paid for that too, right?


bahahahhaaaa

.
the republicans paid for that too, right?


bahahahhaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

yea.. they paid and then punted!