.... how many people died from Embassy attacks when Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld and Condi Rice were in charge? ....
Originally Posted by flghtr65
You forgot Clinton's watch .... why?
THE primary difference is, if I recall correctly, neither the Clinton nor Bush administrations attempted a lame-ass excuse for the source of the bombings ....
it is not about "body counts" ... although one is too much for me ...
....... it is about lying and trying to cover up the source to get re-elected.
Clinton was trying to handle the attacks and OBL as a "law enforcement" effort ...
Bush called it what it was .... war....
The British pulled out of Benghazi months before the Ambassador was killed when their Ambassador was almost killed ... the bottom line is given the hostile environment if we were going to stay security should have been beefed up with Marines with heavy weapons (with ammunition unlike Cairo) OR we should have pulled out like the Brits.
All this "timeline" ... "communication" .... video ...... "riot" .... crap is just that ... crap.
Monday morning quarterbacking excuses for incompetence and attempting to bullshit the U.S. voters right before election time .... which apparently worked. Unfortunately the media didn't want to call their rising star out on the lying ... and neither did his opponent.
Now Obaminable is going to reward the lying sack of shit.