Rubio is the GOP Flavor of the Week

Read the original post genius!!

Listen to chicken dick WR he is more deviant than anyone else on the board. Knows more about cum guzzling and the flavor of the week. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Then my reply:

I believe your last sentence was a fragment....so IB was right about your grammar.

Then your ignorant reply:

You have really turned into chicken dick's butt boy, are you a fragment of JL ? Both of you hear voices in your heads. Which sentence were you referring to? There were two of them. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Then my reply:

Yes, out of the two, I was referring to the last sentence. That is pretty clear.

Originally Posted by DSK
I believe your last sentence was a fragment....so IB was right about your grammar. Originally Posted by DSK

Then your pathetic reply:

Nice try at a cover up butt boy, still carrying chicken dick's water Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Read the original post genius!!

Then my reply:

I believe your last sentence was a fragment....so IB was right about your grammar.

Then your ignorant reply:




Then my reply:



Then your pathetic reply: Originally Posted by DSK

Hey JL if you wish to be chicken dick's nut nuzzler it is OK with me you two have shared a room before. I was surprised you found a period in your rush to kiss chicken dicks ass.

You can't be serious.

Why don't you just admit you were wrong? Originally Posted by ExNYer

I admit nothing.

(Talking to self) - I'm really undercunt, the freelance faggot from Arkansas who refuses to come clean about his prior handles. So right off the bat, I am a liar and my whole identity on this board is a fraud. Admit I was wrong? Hahahaha, that's a good one! Heck, I get my ass handed to me in this forum every day and twice on Sunday. I'm just a freelance eccie spammer. That's what I'm paid for. What do I care? Originally Posted by WombRaider

We hear you, undercunt.

.

Who could hate the Japanese? Originally Posted by DSK

In Dec. 1941 everyone could.

What is it with this forum and syntax. Goddamn. Originally Posted by WombRaider

I was using a cell phone, Mr. Grammar Nazi.

"That will BE one achievement..."

Most of the grammar Nazi's can't speak coherently either.

In Dec. 1941 everyone could. Originally Posted by lustylad

Even the Japanese Americans, that we rounded up by the thousands and shipped off to camps...

I was using a cell phone, Mr. Grammar Nazi.

"That will BE one achievement..." Originally Posted by ExNYer

I'm always using a cellphone. Do you see any fuckups? No. Because I'm just that good. What's your next excuse?

We hear you, undercunt.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

You continue to circle the drain. Caught between your hatred for me and your desire to suck my dick. It's a vicious conundrum. I will never admit to something that just isn't true, no matter how deeply unhinged you continue to illustrate yourself to be. I'm not sure who made you arbiter. It's a self-appointed position at best, brought on by your delusions of grandeur and a desire to be taken seriously, even though your faculties have long since faded into the night. You're most like a flea. You flit around, barely noticed, but annoying just the same. Eventually, you'll be crushed between my fingers. And forever forgotten, as the march of time continues ever forward.

Hey JL if you wish to be chicken dick's nut nuzzler it is OK with me you two have shared a room before. I was surprised you found a period in your rush to kiss chicken dicks ass. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You are a person who cannot admit he messed up with a simple sentence fragment. Just admit it and move on.

So what if being gay is a choice? I think sometimes it is, and other times the person may not have a choice. Who cares? If they are happy, and not hurting anyone, leave them alone. If they want to get married, let them. It's none of our, or the government's business. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

COG, that is your most serious error: thinking that IB can be swayed with logic or common sense. I asked him a while back what harm two women having sex does to him. As you can see he ignored it. As usual. Instead he replies with:

That's a two way street ... especially considering how the LBGT community enlists the power of the government to impose acceptance of their deviant behavior on the rest of society. What they do BCD should absolutely remain BCD and not propagated in public.

And for those who have any doubts as to the definition of "deviant":

deviant : different from what is considered to be normal
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

As if "the government" has forced him to have a gay lover. I wonder what he means by "enlists the power of the government to impose acceptance of their deviant behavior on the rest of society" I think what he means is he wants the government to make them disappear. As I pointed out before, it all goes back to his own insecurity about his sexuality. Why would two men or two women holding hands in public threaten him so?

It's funny how these idiots are arguing morality.....on a HOOKER BOARD.
"it's abnormal". What standards are we using here? The bible? Then you and everyone else on here is just as much in the wrong as any faggot out there.

What the fuck do you want someone to do if his dick won't stand up at the sight of a lovely 18 year old (girl)? Try going a month without choking the chicken and tell me how well you can control your impulsive sexual urges. If he feels attracted to guys instead it's his personal choice and he shouldn't have to explain it anyone.

Chastising others for acting on their "deviant" sexual temptations and simultaneously paying teenagers to deep-throat wrinkly 50 year old dicks. Class act! Originally Posted by shanm

Well said. But that is exactly what worries IB, that he is Ted Haggard hiding in the closet. But trust IB, he is the authoritative expert on what is "normal", don't you know? How dare you question him! He has more experience being deviant than anyone else on here!

.

COG, that is your most serious error: thinking that IB can be swayed with logic or common sense. I asked him a while back what harm two women having sex does to him. As you can see he ignored it. As usual. Instead he replies with:

As if "the government" has forced him to have a gay lover. I wonder what he means by "enlists the power of the government to impose acceptance of their deviant behavior on the rest of society" I think what he means is he wants the government to make them disappear. As I pointed out before, it all goes back to his own insecurity about his sexuality. Why would two men or two women holding hands in public threaten him so?

Well said. But that is exactly what worries IB, that he is Ted Haggard hiding in the closet. But trust IB, he is the authoritative expert on what is "normal", don't you know? How dare you question him! He has more experience being deviant than anyone else on here!

Originally Posted by Old-T

Two thousand years of historic, legal precedence in Western society trumps your lying, LBGT misinformation campaign every day of the week, Old-THUMPER.

Two thousand years of historic, legal precedence in Western society trumps your lying, LBGT misinformation campaign every day of the week, Old-THUMPER.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

There have been gays for longer than 2000 years. Not sure what you're trying to prove with that statement.

There have been gays for longer than 2000 years. Not sure what you're trying to prove with that statement. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Over the course of 2000 years certain individuals and groups have practiced cannibalism, but that doesn't mean it's not deviant behavior, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Over the course of 2000 years certain individuals and groups have practiced cannibalism, but that doesn't mean it's not deviant behavior, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

so now cannibalism and homosexuality are the same thing? As I said, some people like broccoli. I think it's gross. Does that make those who like it a deviant?