How quickly you forget! I guess if it happened 4 years ago all is forgiven, right?Yes, 4 years is a while ago.
Did you buy on the dip? I'll bet the guy who planted the fake story did!
https://money.cnn.com/2017/12/02/med...oss/index.html Originally Posted by lustylad
This is actually from Peter Navaros research Research made while he was on the taxpayers dime. But it was okay. He was doing it as a private citizen (he claims).. It’s not fake news.It's bullshit from a guy with no election expertise covered by a news service with no reporting expertise. Sounds like fake news to me.
https://www.oann.com/ariz-audit-unde...igns-of-fraud/ Originally Posted by bambino
And this only after a few days of the forensic audit.Only in your warped imagination
https://worthypolitics.com/this-is-h...-250000-votes/
More to come!!! Originally Posted by bambino
Yes, 4 years is a while ago.Wow, you caught FOX red-handed with 3 lies in a week! Really, really earth-shattering ones too!
How about 3 stories by fox last week?
https://www.businessinsider.com/righ...in-week-2021-4 Originally Posted by VerySkeptical
This audit is a joke. Led by a conspiracy wacko with few to no bipartisan observers, no media except for the Trump network, no certifications to work on the machines, no security, etc.If you say so, munchy.
Trumpys complained when they had to stay 6 feet away from counters let alone hundreds of feet. Originally Posted by VerySkeptical
Is that 250,000 so far?You are not only the president of the trumptard club, you are a member too.
I'm delighted the DumboCrats believe that having illegal votes is fine and dandy .... then they won't whine and blubber again like they did in the fall of 2016. I guess it just takes a little longer to verify unsigned & unverified votes when cast.
I'm already filling out ballots for 2022 and 2024. Originally Posted by LexusLover
And this only after a few days of the forensic audit.Fake news.
https://worthypolitics.com/this-is-h...-250000-votes/
More to come!!! Originally Posted by bambino
It's bullshit from a guy with no election expertise covered by a news service with no reporting expertise. Sounds like fake news to me.You are a snob and an elitist. So a person with no experience with elections (a good thing probably) and no reporting service (what that has to do with anything is beyond me) is checking for irregularities which you want to call voter fraud (the tested buzz word of the left). With these close vote counts, irregularities, intentional or not, could change the outcome of an election. I would think that the "party of the people" would really like to know what the people voted for. You reluctance clearly shows your bias and hypocrisy. Think of it like this, a wife suspects her husband of adultery. She hires a private detective to get the goods on the unfaithful spouse. She has a sealed reported delivered to her in front the collective families at a family gathering. She announces that she is going to open the report and read it. The husband (that would be the democrat party) insists that he has done nothing wrong but demands that any report from any private detective remain sealed. That is she opens the report that she is showing that she never loved him. That if she looks at the report then she in practice asking for a divorce. That if she reads the report to the families then she must be cheating on him and this report is a cover for her own infidelity. He still insists that he has done nothing wrong and wants the report burned unopened. He even gets vocal members of the family to insist that the report be burned.
No reason to suspect the word of one of Trump's top liars is there? Strange the number of claimed votes taken from Trump matches the numbers on Navarro's charts. Where did he get his numbers from?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewals...h=52581d411205
From the OAN link you posted.
"Meanwhile, Trump-era trade advisor Peter Navarro has been looking ahead to a similar audit in Georgia. He predicts an audit would likely reveal election fraud in the 2020 election just as it is in Arizona. No voter fraud has been detected in AZ.Navarro added, the scale of voter fraud in Georgia is “much larger than in Arizona” and cited preliminary estimates."
This audit is a joke. Led by a conspiracy wacko with few to no bipartisan observers, no media except for the Trump network, no certifications to work on the machines, no security, etc.
Trumpys complained when they had to stay 6 feet away from counters let alone hundreds of feet. Originally Posted by VerySkeptical
You are a snob and an elitist. So a person with no experience with elections (a good thing probably) and no reporting service (what that has to do with anything is beyond me) is checking for irregularities which you want to call voter fraud (the tested buzz word of the left). With these close vote counts, irregularities, intentional or not, could change the outcome of an election. I would think that the "party of the people" would really like to know what the people voted for. You reluctance clearly shows your bias and hypocrisy. Think of it like this, a wife suspects her husband of adultery. She hires a private detective to get the goods on the unfaithful spouse. She has a sealed reported delivered to her in front the collective families at a family gathering. She announces that she is going to open the report and read it. The husband (that would be the democrat party) insists that he has done nothing wrong but demands that any report from any private detective remain sealed. That is she opens the report that she is showing that she never loved him. That if she looks at the report then she in practice asking for a divorce. That if she reads the report to the families then she must be cheating on him and this report is a cover for her own infidelity. He still insists that he has done nothing wrong and wants the report burned unopened. He even gets vocal members of the family to insist that the report be burned.
If the husband (the democrat party) is innocent then why not have the report read or in this case, why not do a complete analysis of the election? But that's the rub, the husband is not acting innocent and is just buying time or trying to mentally abuse his wife into complying. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
This argument is a bunch of bull cookies. Maricopa county already did a partial recount to verify that the sample matched the totals correctly. Then they did an audit of all of the voting machines to find any irregularities. After finding no evidence of any fraud and no evidence of any irregularities in the voting machines the election supervisors, 4 republicans and 1 democrat, certified that there was no fraud in the 2020 election.
Hell, Attorney General William Barr (Trump's butt boy) declared the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.
Your problem is not that the Democrats don't want to do a recount. The problem is that the Republicans simply won't believe the results of the recount that was already done. Legally done by the way. What the Arizona senate is doing now is more political theater that will have no effect on the outcome of the 2020 election and will simply feed the paranoia and conspiracy hogwash that you are hanging onto for dear life.
This obsession with Trump's Big Lie and the attempts to overturn a legal election is deeply un-democratic and deeply un-american. Originally Posted by txdot-guy