Hey River,
I think over priced are the ladies
that start out with the gps attitudes
and have no reviews to justify the
Cost. They need to build their
reputation up and increase
accordingly.
There's just providers who's rates you'd pay, and ones you wouldn't. What you won't pay, someone else gladly will. Pay who you like that charges an amount you find acceptable, and don't worry about the ones you think are overpriced. Guys who prefer inexpensive chicks sure do a lot of bitching about more expensive providers. Why? Ya'll should be too busy having your super affordable fun to worry about it, right? Right. Originally Posted by VIPRaniLaneThat's about as succinct a dismissal of this "overpriced" stupidity as I've seen. Nicely written! I would just add a third category of providers: the ones whose rates I'd be happy to pay, except that I can't. I guess that's supposed to offend me. But ... it doesn't. Rock on, ladies, rock on!
I'll start listening to people complaining that I (or ladies in my price range) am overpriced when my phone stops ringing. Until then, you are wrong, and my price is just right.Exactly correct. If the lady is getting the number of calls/appointments she wants, she is appropriately priced... period.Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport
Not true from an economic standpoint.Thanks for saying this. You took the words right out of my mouth. I am a low volume provider where I spend time with only a handful of gentlemen a week. I have my very own incall in an upscale area where my special friends may visit me. I would not be able to afford that place, plus decorate it with the best of art and furniture and on top of that pay my house note and other bills if I went down on my rate. It cost money for my nice clothes and lingerie that the gentlemen enjoy seeing me in when we spend time together. Plus as with most ladies, it cost to get our hair and nails done along with other necessities needed to keep ourselves looking good for you. NONE OF THIS IS FREE.
Not true from a personal standpoint.
I'm always the first to argue economics, but respectfully it's because I understand them. A provider may be willing to work 40 hours per week. If she got 40 hours of work charging $150, then she'd be making $6k per week. Now suppose that at $250 per hour, she was getting 30 hours of work per week. She'd be making $7.5k doing less work. As such, profit would be higher when she raises her prices even though demand falls and even though she's willing to give 40 hours of supply.
Personally, she may be ok charging $400 an hour and only working 10 hours a week for $4k per week. Not everyone's sole goal is profit maximization. Some people prefer quality of life over shear money. Originally Posted by sketchball82