What is the best solution to homosexuality?

Oh, and anybody should be impressed? I was doing reviews here before there was an ECCIE and you were sucking cock in NY. Originally Posted by bambino

You were sucking cock in pigsburgh before there was an eccie?

You were sucking cock in pigsburgh before there was an eccie? Originally Posted by WombRaider

Do you oppose guys sucking cock? If not, why use it as an insult?

You were sucking cock in pigsburgh before there was an eccie? Originally Posted by WombRaider

No, I was fucking chicks from ASPD you jerkoff. You seem to be an expert on homosexuality. Remember, if you suck one cock, you're a cocksucker for life. Cocksucker.

JL, The Pissant and a few others are so homophobic that their blatant homosectional extrusions are showing.

Maybe they should tour as the BLEW MEN GROUP.

How fucking ignorant. This has got to be one of the most fucked up statements I've seen on here. Discrimination based on obvious difference is wrong but based on differences you can hide, we'll that's OK. I've know you were a retrograde cock nugget for a while but this takes the fucking cake. Way to step in, shitbird. Originally Posted by WombRaider

I'm only trying to help you, dipshit. Stop telling everyone you meet you're a fag and maybe you won't get beat up as much!

In response to the OP's original query, I say....fuck them in the ass.

Waterboard 'em till they turn straight.

Do you oppose guys sucking cock? If not, why use it as an insult? Originally Posted by DSK

I merely asked a question. Perhaps your choice to see it as an insult says more about you...

No, I was fucking chicks from ASPD you jerkoff. You seem to be an expert on homosexuality. Remember, if you suck one cock, you're a cocksucker for life. Cocksucker. Originally Posted by bambino

I'm surprised you're able to touch your dick when you piss for fear of that making you gay. It's only gay when you touch ANOTHER dick.

I'm only trying to help you, dipshit. Stop telling everyone you meet you're a fag and maybe you won't get beat up as much! Originally Posted by lustylad

I've never been beat up in my fucking life. Keep trying, shitbird

Help your enforcer, gay rey. He needs help keeping your fat ass in dingleberry pie.

I'm surprised you're able to touch your dick when you piss for fear of that making you gay. It's only gay when you touch ANOTHER dick. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Of course, and you would know.

Dumb fucking hick

An odd friend introduced me to this idea.

#gayevolution

The world is over crowded birth to death every day is over 2000 to 1 .
http://www.sciencefocus.com/qa/what-...-any-given-day

#gayevolution

Gays are not considered breeders. two men do not procreate , two women do not procreate.

just as giraffes as a species grew longer necks to reach leaves at the top of trees, humans as a species evolved to reduce the number of people being created.
With less people being created, the trend of over crowding will be reversed with more resources are available to allow the future generations to continue and prosper.

Translation for red necks.
Jesus made them gays to like other gays so they don't make babies. That way we can make more good christian babies because we ain't gay so none our babies be gay.

Of course, and you would know.

Dumb fucking hick Originally Posted by bambino

Says the fat turd from pigsburgh. Go suck another dick. Maybe you won't like it this time.

Says the fat turd from pigsburgh. Go suck another dick. Maybe you won't like it this time. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Oh, that's special. From an imbecile with 8500 posts in 8 months. Has 3 whopping reviews of 2 Hos. Combined weight over 320lbs. And look you stupid hick from Arkansas, pigs are a major part of your society. Does this sound familiar, wooooooo pig sooie!

Fucking dumb hick

No, they don't. Because they are not homosexuals. They are bisexuals. They are different to begin with.

If you agree it's a continuum, then the differences blur as you go from 100% straight to 100% gay. I didn't say homosexuality is ALWAYS a choice. I said it obviously can be a choice for bisexuals. By definition, a bisexual can choose to have a same-sex OR an opposite-sex relationship.

And your point is? The "split" attraction of bisexuals is no more relevant to homosexuals than it is to heterosexuals. That sword cuts both ways. Are you not really straight - like you think you are - because someone else is at least partially attracted to both sexes? That means heterosexuality is a choice, too, right?

My point is there is a whole category of people out there (bisexuals) who can't say “I don't have a choice – I was born that way”. I didn't say this makes you less straight or Rock Hudson less queer.

Not true. Even if it was something of a choice, that does NOT mean that therapy can affect it one way or another.

So if someone is 90% straight and happily married with a family but is tempted to throw it all away because he/she has occasional same-sex attractions, therapy is completely futile and can offer no help? How can you so rashly dismiss it out of hand and for every situation?

And I recall reading about a survey that studied bisexuals that were put in a situation where one of their partners forced them to make a choice. The overwhelming majority of bisexuals chose to break off the hetero relationship and stay with their homosexual partners.

They should have figured it out BEFORE they entered into hetero marriages or relationships. The fact that they failed to do so is horribly unfair to their hetero partners and their offspring.

What does that tell you about "bisexuals"? Perhaps that a LOT of them are not really attracted to the opposite sex. They just play the part to fit in to society, perhaps for family or religious reasons.

If they're not attracted to the opposite sex at all, they're obviously gay, not bisexual. You are really just trying to substitute one behavioral excuse (“Society made me do something against my nature”) for another (“I was born that way”). That argument might work for people who are 100% gay, but not for bisexuals. They have a degree of choice and should be held responsible for their choices.

So, your argument rests on the alleged choices of people who are mostly faking same sex attraction.

You mean faking opposite-sex attraction, right? Bisexuals don't have to fake anything – they can reach orgasm and meet their sexual needs with partners from either sex. And I'm not in favor of faking anything. Your argument rests on the assumption that sexual orientation is essentially dichotomous – you're either gay or straight, nothing in between - and bisexuals are really just homosexuals who haven't admitted it yet.

And there you give away your whole argument. Thanks for putting cure in italics.

It's all about getting rid of people you don't like. And you will grasp at any dishonest straw to give yourself hope. Even phony reparative therapies that not only don't cure homosexuals, but often inflict significant emotional damage on them.

What about the emotional damage inflicted on a spouse and children when a self-indulgent bisexual chooses to dump them because he/she wants to explore new sexual preferences? Look, I am not an expert on “reparative therapies” and neither are you. It's ok to have a healthy skepticism but on what basis can anyone say they're all phony and can never work? The gay crowd is driven by politics, not empirical evidence.

You can't pray the gay away. No matter how much you pray you can.

Who said anything about praying? I was talking about professional therapy and counseling. For bisexuals, if not for gays.
Originally Posted by ExNYer

And who said anything about "getting rid of people you don't like"? I'm not advocating tossing gays off buildings, am I? There's nothing "dishonest" about my arguments either. I'm willing to be as honest as Masters and Johnson.
.