Latisha James Under Investigation for……….

... Go look-about, mate... Different sites have mentioned it.

Letitia is also tryin' to use her pull as NY AG to scare off
any news reporters who are seeking information on her-own
family members. ... But no worrys - as I'm surely NOT afraid!
('Cause I aint a news reporter)

#### Salty

... Go look-about, mate... Different sites have mentioned it. Originally Posted by Salty Again

No they have not. Find one. A real one.

And not a post of a repost of a repost of an Overton News post about a MAGA douchebag who made up a bunch of shameless lies for his rant on Newsmax. That shit ain't working in this piece of shit thread either.

...Please show us the source for the highlighted statement above... Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Before you go fish yourself, stop by the Technical Forum and learn-to-search.

Even CNN-LoL had to cover it(up) to some extent:
Prosecutor who resisted bringing charges against NY AG was fired after allegations she sent case info to her personal email

The Beat goes On.

'Not secret': Judge unseals latest in Letitia James lawfare agenda
Indicted New York attorney general fighting 'selective enforcement' investigation
By Bob Unruh November 3, 2025

...a judge has unsealed details about her fight against a federal criminal probe for alleged "selective enforcement."

Those allegations involve her lawfare against Trump, his business operations, and even a separate case involving the National Rifle Association.

"James's effort to block subpoenas issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) touches 'on matters of national concern, with implications that stretch well beyond this action,'" Judge Lorna Schofield wrote in her order making the filings public.

"Unsealing this action is not only permissible but compelled," the judge wrote. "One simple fact drives this conclusion: the information at issue is not secret."

Just weeks ago, it was revealed acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York John A. Sarcone III subpoenaed documents concerning James's civil fraud case against Trump and his company, along with her case against the National Rifle Association.

James has claimed that an investigation of her lawfare agenda actually is "retaliation" against her...

Seems we're starting to learn that Fishy-Tishy thinks there is a fish-eyed difference between Open-Lawfare and Super Secret Sneaky-Lawfare. Leastwise, she's hoping not to get tossed in the slow boat to prison.

...Please show us the source for the highlighted statement above.... Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Before you go fish yourself, stop by the Technical Forum and learn-to-search.... Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Your deflecting criticism of my research is understandable; I've mocked and delegitimized yours in about four different threads this past week alone. You use MAGA shills like Rob Finnerty. I use the USDA.

I repeat my question, for at least the 3rd time: where is the source for your assertion that the Judge wants these "communications" because they think that these EVDA people leaked "fictions" because they did not "want to prosecute one of their own" and wanted to "avoid charging" Comey and James.

Now a Judge is demanding internal communications about her processing of charges against Fishy-Tishy, because they feel that the formerly employed partisan hacks at EDVA didn't want to prosecute one of their own and went on a leaking and sharing spree with their fictions to avoid charging Comrades Cornay and Fishy-Tishy.
Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

WHERE

IS

IT?

...I use the USDA... Originally Posted by Mort Watt

I'm not aware of the USDA prosecuting Fishy-Tishy. Got a link for that?

...where is the source for your assertion that the Judge wants these "communications"... Originally Posted by Mort Watt

I only see two viable options for you Comrade:
- Get better news disservice outlets
- Do your own research, here or elsewhere

Oh shoot-skis. I totally forgot.
Your Global Engagement Center (GEC), aka disinformation diktat, got chite canned.

State Department Officially Dismantled ‘Disinformation’ Agency
by Sean Moran 26 Oct 2025

The State Department has officially canceled the Global Engagement Center (GEC) as part of President Donald Trump’s mission to shut down the “censorship industrial complex,” according to a report.

Paul Sperry, a senior investigative reporter for RealClearInvestigations, wrote that the State Department officially closed the Global Engagement Center.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced in April that the State Department would close the GEC.

“Today, it is my pleasure to announce the State Department is taking a crucial step toward keeping the president’s promise to liberate American speech by abolishing forever the body formerly known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC),” Rubio wrote in an op-ed for the Federalist, stating that to protect free speech the “censorship industrial complex must be dismantled.”

Rubio contended in the op-ed that then-President Barack Obama transformed the GEC, which was meant to target international terrorism, to cover any and all “foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts.”...

Not having a source to tell you what to think is gonna leave a skid mark. What ever will you Cock-a-Doodly-Doo?

... No matter what sources say, I am already aware that some
four (4) out of (5) "Insiders" surveyed believe that Letitia
surely targeted Trump for Prosecution. ... She even campaigned
on the Fact she would target Him.

... So NOW - Letitia is claiming that SHE is a target.
And she's forgetting all her Mortgage Fraud for the last
several years. ... Time of her to face the music.

... If Letitia somehow is found Not guilty of charges, you can
surely expect barristers coming from the woodworks to challenge
New York's past-convictions of people charged with Mortgage Fraud.


##### Salty

Your deflecting criticism of my research is understandable; I've mocked and delegitimized yours in about four different threads this past week alone. You use MAGA shills like Rob Finnerty. I use the USDA.

I repeat my question, for at least the 3rd time: where is the source for your assertion that the Judge wants these "communications" because they think that these EVDA people leaked "fictions" because they did not "want to prosecute one of their own" and wanted to "avoid charging" Comey and James.

WHERE

IS

IT? Originally Posted by Mort Watt

I'm not aware of the USDA prosecuting Fishy-Tishy. Got a link for that?I only see two viable options for you Comrade:
- Get better news disservice outlets
- Do your own research, here or elsewhere Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Okay, okay. SInce you've insisted so nicely, I'll get off my lilly-white ass and do my own research. Elon's gonna be MIGHTY pissed that you took me away from all of the rocket surgery I got piled up. But fuck that goose-stepping asshole.

Sooooo...let's see... if I input everything you've claimed here...then multiply it by the off-topic deflections...and divide by the square root of all of the awkward, trite colloquial blather...

Hmmmm. Keeps generating "404 not found."

Hang on...

Lemme look deep into that Zero-degree-Kelvin Ether that you so love to reference...

Nope. Still inconclusive.

Ahhh!

I just reached waaaaaay up my ass and found it...I shoulda known to look there first.

Here it is!

Yup...

Simon Says: It was a lie. Clearly.

Your Global Engagement Center (GEC), aka disinformation diktat, got chite canned.Not having a source to tell you what to think is gonna leave a skid mark. What ever will you Cock-a-Doodly-Doo? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

What in the ever-lovin FUUUUCK is this?

Wait! I'll do more research...

I'm plugging it into Little Mort's "Speak-and-Spell" this very moment...

Output equals....

Faak. It was so obvious...

It's just another non-sequiter off-topic attempted re-direct!

Cool! I guess we are done!

Oh!!! I almost forgot. THANKS for the suggestion to go to the Technical Forum for help! I'm gonna submit this there right now!

I'ma hopin they make a "Sticky" out of it!

...Cool! I guess we are done!... Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Takes some longer than others I s'pose.
But if'n ya wanna talk about Letitia James and her indictments and investigations, I'll be somewhere nearby, 'cause that is the OP topic de jure.

Either way, her fish tail is fried, ya know, because no one is above the law.
I heard that from someone who was swimming with the fishes.

Takes some longer than others I s'pose.
But if'n ya wanna talk about Letitia James and her indictments and investigations, I'll be somewhere nearby, 'cause that is the OP topic de jure.... Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

I've tried. Multiple times.

But all you have done is try to distract and deflect from my multiple requests of you to clarify specific statements that you have made, forcing me to call them out for what they are:

Lies.

Off topic? Yeah, that's what you and your MAGA cheerleading squad do when you've had your asses handed to you - complain about the topic.

Right after posting brain dingleberries like "Your Global Engagement Center (GEC), aka disinformation diktat, got chite canned."

So...IF'N...you want to actually talk about THE TOPIC... begin by answering my fucking question.

First asked in post #100

Then in #105

And #107

And #110

And #113

Maybe spend less time figuring out childish idioms and spend more time posting meaningful thoughts of your own. Less lies would be a refreshing change also.

I will ask one more time, directly:

Please show me the source for your assertion that the Judge wants these "communications" because they think that these EVDA people leaked "fictions" because they did not "want to prosecute one of their own" and wanted to "avoid charging" Comey and James.

It's a simple question: where did you get this?

Don't tell me "do your own research" again.

I have. It seems not to exist. That you made this up.

PROVE ME WRONG.

I'ma right chere awaitin' on ya, padnah!