How can you be for banning something when you don't even know what it is?

Since you can die quickly from an Air Embalism, and since air's free, why not dispose with those bloody chemicals, and just inject them with pure air!



Add to that imo part of the BIG cost with the 'death sentence', is how long they stay ON Death row in solitary, AND ALL their appeal after appeal after appeal they get..
IMO Death row should be ONE APPEAL, and a MAX of 5 years from time of conviction till sentence is carried out.. Originally Posted by garhkal

Injecting air into a vein or artery although can cause death it won't happen as quickly as you may think and has the potential to produce pain and discomfort before a person actually dies. So the courts and ethics boards would consider that cruel and unusual punishment.

Jim

Ok. Then go back to a good beheading.. Our tech can make sharp enough blades that teh whole "you need to hack 2-3 times to lop it off' shouldn't be a concern..

BUT THEN AGAIN, why the hell should we not be cruel to convicts when THEY HAD NO care about not being cruel to their victims?

Ok. Then go back to a good beheading.. Our tech can make sharp enough blades that teh whole "you need to hack 2-3 times to lop it off' shouldn't be a concern..

BUT THEN AGAIN, why the hell should we not be cruel to convicts when THEY HAD NO care about not being cruel to their victims? Originally Posted by garhkal

With the Guillotin, it was about as quick as you can get. I was watching a program on the History Channel about the Guillotin, and in Nazi Germany, which beheaded more people than any modern society, their professional executioner could lop off a head every two minutes.

As to the humanity involved, who knows. If the object is to kill a person as quickly as possible, beheading by Guillotine has to be by far the most efficient.

As to whether the severed head is still "alive" for a few seconds after, able to contimplate it's predicament, who knows.

.

With the Guillotin, it was about as quick as you can get. I was watching a program on the History Channel about the Guillotin, and in Nazi Germany, which beheaded more people than any modern society, their professional executioner could lop off a head every two minutes.

As to the humanity involved, who knows. If the object is to kill a person as quickly as possible, beheading by Guillotine has to be by far the most efficient.

As to whether the severed head is still "alive" for a few seconds after, able to contimplate it's predicament, who knows. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Ok. Then go back to a good beheading.. Our tech can make sharp enough blades that teh whole "you need to hack 2-3 times to lop it off' shouldn't be a concern..

BUT THEN AGAIN, why the hell should we not be cruel to convicts when THEY HAD NO care about not being cruel to their victims? Originally Posted by garhkal

Why don't we kill them all? Because we have evolved as a society. Christians, you know the main stream TrumPutin voter, should be opposed to the death penalty according to Christian teachings. Whats funny is most are the biggest proponents of the death penalty. Its such a paradox. If your an atheist, like The Panty Boy Kid, I mean Jerk Off Kid aka Waco Kid, or a Jew it doesn't really matter

Ok. Then go back to a good beheading.. Our tech can make sharp enough blades that teh whole "you need to hack 2-3 times to lop it off' shouldn't be a concern..

BUT THEN AGAIN, why the hell should we not be cruel to convicts when THEY HAD NO care about not being cruel to their victims? Originally Posted by garhkal

That's too messy.


Jim

if you're gonna execute someone just overdose them with barbituates or similar sleep drugs instead of using 3 different drugs.

I mean.. many vets uses only one drug (don't know what they use) to put down sick animals and we use 3 drugs to put down a human, how stupid is that.