"Mandles"...... If you are visiting Austin and reading reviews be forwarned

Hmmm, yes. I believe an insinuation was made that I also have 'Mandles' and therefore, some fake reviews.
Matters not to me what whippers believes.
His (or anyone else's)hateful perception of me, has as much impact on my popularity or self-confidence as it does on the brand of toothpaste I buy. Nada. None. Zilch.

His inability to comprehend me as nothing more than a fat/old/bitter whore who has done NOTHING of importance for the past **years(if you only knew!) only to end up here...with no other choices makes me chuckle.

The mere idea that men seek me out (I actually have to turn down appointments) and write glowing reviews is as unfathomable to whippet and equalled by my complete disbelief that young, 'attractive' girls would want to see him naked. Much less have to go down....
Never mind, you get the idea.


Now, back to the other point. Feel free to contact the moderators and have them check any suspicious IP addresses or reviews.

Originally Posted by Aphrodite

Whispers, Thanks for the cogent explanation. I think I am hearing you say that there doesn't need to be an provider age limit in coed. If there is a chance that you were wrong about the alleged subterfuge of one of the named escorts, would you consider asking the mods for a thread edit so as to not impact her ability to make a living?
Respectfully, Mr Peabody Originally Posted by Mr Peabody

Whispers, Thanks for the cogent explanation. I think I am hearing you say that there doesn't need to be an provider age limit in coed. If there is a chance that you were wrong about the alleged subterfuge of one of the named escorts, would you consider asking the mods for a thread edit so as to not impact her ability to make a living?
Respectfully, Mr Peabody. Originally Posted by Mr Peabody

I work...... gotta earn a dollar here and there.....
You work?? Is your job on here, because you seem to be on here 24/7?
I have a social life and a couple of great young ladies that I pay attention to......
Probably family members. With your blatant disrespect for the ladies on here, I can't imagine anyone really wanting to see you unless they are desperate.
But when I get free time I get back around to responding..... Originally Posted by Whispers

I would like to know which of my reviews are fake. Originally Posted by Claire She Blows

Yup, where is this list?
You obviously started this thread to warn any new or future clients of ours (read your thread headline) that we are not what our reviews say because they are fake , so where is this proof?!

Still avoiding the real issue. Originally Posted by Kitty Bunny Fuck

Why don't you just admit you were wrong and apologize. You know real men, real gentleman do that. Originally Posted by Kitty Bunny Fuck

Whispy,
This "get rid of the old providers tirade is becoming boring and senseless. It leads some of us to suspect that you have some ulterior motive.
You violated or disregarded 5 forum rules below. Why do this?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.
#11 - Review "Quacking" , a term which describes openly proclaiming falsehood in reply to a review, will be strongly discouraged by our staff. If you believe a review to be false, use the RTM function to report it to your local staff.
If he feels one of my reviews is fake then he should RTM it. But I'm curious as to which one.
#24 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.
#31 - Often times in the hobby arena, members may display a tendency towards bringing their conflicts with other members to the board. This will be strongly discouraged and swift effort will be made to put it to rest. Additionally, staff will make every effort to stay uninvolved in conflicts and disputes between members off the board except in such cases where the board becomes directly affected. Originally Posted by Mr Peabody

You and everyone else here knows that if such a PM had actually been sent to you of the nature you describe that simply RTMing it would have resulted in my going on a vacation from the board. Originally Posted by Whispers

Are pigeons related to the topic presented here?

Could you please try to get back on topic.... Originally Posted by Whispers

Well the saying is true; hurt people hurt people. Originally Posted by Ebony Jasmine Love Austin