ROS

Rockstar,

First off, learn to quote and respond to a post. Originally Posted by Doove

What makes you thinck I would have to "learn" how to do that?
Your rambling posts that go on and on and on and on ad infinitum aren't worth the effort... that is all.

Rockstar,
Secondly, i'll send some props your way in that you're actually the first person to come up with something at least close to legitimate in the way of an argument. Originally Posted by Doove

Maybe because you pay more attention to my gems of wisdom. Actually, many raised other legitimate concerns.



And now that I've shown you that I don't need to "learn" how to quote and post... and you have yet to learn the art of brevity... I'll get lazy again... so that you will once again have something to complain about regarding my post.



But there's two problems with your suggestion. First, if i acquired the ML or ROS info as Manic010101 and leaked it to anyone, the only way anybody would know it was i who leaked it would be if the person i leaked it to ratted me out. And here's where your theory falls apart. If i acquired the ML or ROS info as Doove and leaked it to anyone, the only way anybody would know it was i who leaked it would be if the person i leaked it to ratted me out. So my obtaining the info as Manic010101 or as Doove would make absolutely zero difference in whether anyone could finger me as a culprit in leaking info.
As I suspected, you didn't follow along correctly. No surprise there.

Secondly,
How many times are you going to say secondly in this post of yours?
there is absolutely zero evidence that i leaked anything, or ever intended to leak anything. But because someone such as yourself can come up with some theory as to what i could have done or intended if i was so inclined, albeit absent any actual evidence, i've conceded all along that i shouldn't get away without any punishment at all. To which i've stated all along that i deserved to be pointed.

Nevertheless, you raised fair points. But you couldn't stop there, and just had to go back to you being you with this nonsense:

As for the hypothetical


Since as I understand it, this was NOT your situation....
Your "hypothetical" IS: irrelevant, unnecessary and preposterous
Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

You forgot the picture:



The sole justification i've been given for my being banned was that i broke a guideline rule. That's it. And that the circumstances behind my doing so were totally irrelevant, because a broken rule is a broken rule. No harm done?
The ENTIRE purpose of my response is that there WAS harm done. You had clandestine access to Men's Lounge activity on three separate occasions. Perhaps I'd have NOT posted something in the ML had I known you had access.

Who cares? Case closed. So the point of my analogy is to point out that circumstances can, in fact, matter. Because if they can, then unless you got more, relying solely on the "you broke the rule" argument is nothing short of hogwash.

And as we've come to find out, if i understand OSD and BJ correctly (no guarantee there, that's for sure), a lifetime ban for outing someone can be turned into a 5 point infraction......based on the circumstances. So don't tell me, as CC has tried to do, that a second handle infraction can't be turned into a 5 point infraction....based on the circumstances.

So my analogy absolutely is relevant. Though i'll admit, maybe i could have used outing someone as a better example.

Edit: And oh yeah, i named three providers i had potential interest in, so you're wrong there. Originally Posted by Doove

Refresh my memory. I remember you mentioning: Autumn Bolan. Saige, Ericaisbetter, and Amanda. I don't recall the three providers names that you were "interested" in seeing.

Agenda? Me? I will admit to one "agenda"...I dislike stupid people...and since pointing out their stupidity helps them to not be so stupid in the future, Originally Posted by Wakeup

You'll have to try a LOT harder around here to make THAT come true....

Doove - any chance you could do an executive summary for your posts? Less is more buddy. Originally Posted by Bushman69

I've been trying and trying to get him to buy the book... but he won't come up with the 25K(rill).

What makes you thinck I would have to "learn" how to do that?
Your rambling posts that go on and on and on and on ad infinitum aren't worth the effort... that is all. Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

Yet, you spent four days trying to figure out a response.

You failed miserably, by the way.

The ENTIRE purpose of my response is that there WAS harm done. You had clandestine access to Men's Lounge activity on three separate occasions. Perhaps I'd have NOT posted something in the ML had I known you had access.

Yeah, ok. But you'd post something in spite of the very real likelihood that i'd have premium access at some point in the future. Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

If you don't want me to know something you posted, relying on me never getting premium access probably isn't a very smart idea.

And give me 4 days or so to come up with a response to the rest of your nonsense.

EDIT: Though i will add, in getting you to defend the moderators, i feel that if nothing else, i've accomplished at least that much.

Yet, you spent four days trying to figure out a response. Originally Posted by Doove

Oh Dovlin!! You missed me so much you counted the days!!!
Ever tried multi quoting on a phone? I don't have the patience.

You failed miserably, by the way. Originally Posted by Doove

According to who? You?

Yeah, ok. But you'd post something in spite of the very real likelihood that i'd have premium access at some point in the future. Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

If you don't want me to know something you posted, relying on me never getting premium access probably isn't a very smart idea. Originally Posted by Doove

Now you don't think that "I" would be afraid of posting something that I didn't want you to see, do you? I was just doing the hypothetical musing thing that you seem to be so fond of...
I'm pretty much an open book you know. I have no secrets...
And if I REALLY wanted to post something that you couldn't access, there are places I could do that... But there's nothing there either. Sorry to burst your bubble.

And give me 4 days or so to come up with a response to the rest of your nonsense. Originally Posted by Doove

I'm in no hurry. Take as long as you like.
But when you inevitably DO respond....
Refresh my memory. I remember you mentioning: Autumn Bolan. Saige, Ericaisbetter, and Amanda. I don't recall the three providers names that you were "interested" in seeing.

EDIT: Though i will add, in getting you to defend the moderators, i feel that if nothing else, i've accomplished at least that much. Originally Posted by Doove

Who's defending mods??
That's your specialty!!

You are no JJ when it comes to posting on topic pictures.

Sooooo.......

I'm in no hurry. Take as long as you like.
But when you inevitably DO respond....
Refresh my memory. I remember you mentioning: Autumn Bolan. Saige, Ericaisbetter, and Amanda. I don't recall the three providers names that you were "interested" in seeing.

edit add: and address the rest at your leisure... but address it.

You are no JJ when it comes to posting on topic pictures.

Sooooo.......

I'm in no hurry. Take as long as you like.
But when you inevitably DO respond....
Refresh my memory. I remember you mentioning: Autumn Bolan. Saige, Ericaisbetter, and Amanda. I don't recall the three providers names that you were "interested" in seeing.

edit add: and address the rest at your leisure... but address it. Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

where did jj go?


miss him


not

on we go

where did jj go?


miss him


not

on we go Originally Posted by bjwstw

JJ's humor may have been a bit too cerebral for some.
You not missing him is on you.
Off we goo.....

on we go






maybe jj there looking for you. at the gobc which most know what it really stands for.

Gents? The back and forth ... enough!

DD

I'm in no hurry. Take as long as you like.
But when you inevitably DO respond....
Refresh my memory. I remember you mentioning: Autumn Bolan. Saige, Ericaisbetter, and Amanda. I don't recall the three providers names that you were "interested" in seeing. Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

I'm not wasting my time "refreshing your memory". I told you the three. If you can't figure it out, not my problem.

edit add: and address the rest at your leisure... but address it.

Address what?

And give me 4 days or so to come up with a response to the rest of your nonsense. Originally Posted by Doove

edit add: and address the rest at your leisure... but address it. Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

Address what? Originally Posted by Doove

^^^^ Address THAT ^^^^^^ you know... "my" nonsense...

I'm not wasting my time "refreshing your memory". I told you the three. If you can't figure it out, not my problem. Originally Posted by Doove

Ahhh... but you didn't list the three new girls you were so interested in that you absolutely needed to learn more information about by obtaining PA.
Your reasons for obtaining PA are beginning to sound more and more sinister the more I reflect upon it...

Not too quick on the uptake, are ya?

Not too quick on the uptake, are ya? Originally Posted by Doove

So, once again, you have nothing.
Got it.

Just in case this was missed before.....

Gents? The back and forth ... enough!

DD Originally Posted by DDarkness

Wasn't this thread about MD's access? and wasn't he given an answer? Originally Posted by Tiger

Gents? The back and forth ... enough! Originally Posted by DDarkness

Wonder if this counts as a directive from staff...how'd it work out, DD? What's your next step?