I'm going to lead with a PSA, if your IQ isn't triple digits you'll probably not follow along well. If it is, feel free to follow along, you might find some cheap amusement if you're bored.
[/QUOTE]Because if that was what you are claiming, then there is no possible way that Capitol Police official, Matthew N. Hurtig, sent a series of attachments in an email summarizing recent “domestic terrorism” threats starting on December 23, 2020, warning about several "extremist" groups' chatter on thedonald.win website. Ammirite?
Oh, wait. Hold on a second, maybe you are saying that the above emails are true and that there are copies to prove it, but someone Ki-boshed the whole affair and said nevermind, nothing to see here. In that case, I actually do have a question: Whom? <-- notice the actual use of a question mark?
Those seem like logical questions to me. How's by you?
PS: Not to heap too many question on ya and all, besides it's only a small, teensy even, question. But would you happen to know whom made the command decision to not inform the President of the United States, their Commander in Chief, who was about to speak at that rally about the above security issues?[/QUOTE]
I use version 4.0(a).notanidiot of the Ministry of Truth, it functions much better than the beta version of 0.1(ae)gatewaydimwith.
Hmmm...so a search of this individual and story you reference "So you are saying that Capitol Police intelligence expert John T. Nugent Jr." comes up with nobody associated with the Capitol Police...almost. Is he James Bond or Jason Bourne? You can find a link to a story that seems to mirror your "claims" - quotes intentional.
It links to ussanews.com. So (from a sandbox TWACKO...that's a nod, take it) I bit. First thing is a pop-up looking for donations. BUT, just maybe they aren't here just for the grift, right? First clue here should be the actual name, not usa but ussa...not going to say that might have come from united states stupid asses but that's where I would have come up with it. But if you're on a budget here's a free clue.
Typosquatting, a form of
cybersquatting, is based on Internet users mistyping the name of a popular Web site. A typosquatter will monitor how many clicks a "typo" domain name receives and use the information to sell advertising for the sites that receive a high volume of "accidental" traffic.
[28] Many popular fake news websites like ABCnews.com.co attempted to impersonate a legitimate U.S. news publication, relying on readers not actually checking the address they typed or clicked on. They exploited common misspellings, slight misphrasings and abuse of top-level domains such as .com.co as opposed to .com. Many social media users were duped, believing they were going to an actual news publication's website.
Let's check their ratings before we make a snap judgement:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits
one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the
deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (
Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category
may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list
are not considered
fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source.
See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate USSA News Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, lack of transparency, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.
USSA News
Ussanews.com calls itself “the Tea Party’s front page” and says on its “
About” page:
“This site is here directly because of the direction this country, the USA, is headed. Too much government!”
The site is
registered through Tucows, a company that hides the identity and location of the owner of the website.
So, if it's a legitimate news site, why are they hiding the identity AND locations of the owners? < yes I put that there intentionally. So we have a hidden site with unknown owers, asking for donations and publishing propaganda and conspiracy theories among other things. That doesn't seem odd at all, right?
And now, just for one final question to you, if you would indulge me kind sir. Why haven't Matthew N. Hurtig and/or John T. Nugent Jr. been on FAUX news network? Surely you know Tucker Falseone would have tossed both those guys salads on the steps of the Washington Monument to get their story.
So, yeah, I'm going to leave the onus on you to provide some FACTUAL basis for what you claimed about these individuals.
Me, I'm going to pour myself a nice, smooth bourbon over rocks and call it an evening.
