nevada judge delares mistrial against bundy men for BLM standoff

well, tell that to the innocent victims who spent 15 years or more in the pokey for some crimes they didn't commit all. and its because the DA hid evidence that would clear them. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Add to that the # of times we've seen 60 minutes do exposes on divorce lawyers, (especially female ones) where those lawyers flat out ENCOURAGE their women clients to falsify charges of domestic violence or child abuse, so as to get the guy kicked out of the house, thus ensuring SHE will get it in the divorce, all cause there's rarely if ever, and punishment FOR THOSE lawyers or those they encourage to falsify info...
bamscram's Avatar
It's important for parrots like you to realize they are parrots.

And parrots like you only learn from repetitive statements. Originally Posted by LexusLover
All you cluster fucks do is spread false info. Plus parrot the same lame crap daily.
LexusLover's Avatar
Plus parrot the same lame crap daily. Originally Posted by bamscram
So says the Supreme Parrot!

The case is now dismissed. Whether you want to believe it or not.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...s-bars-retrial

Judge Dismisses Federal Case Against Cliven Bundy And Sons, Bars Retrial
LexusLover's Avatar
So says the Supreme Parrot!

The case is now dismissed. Whether you want to believe it or not.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...s-bars-retrial Originally Posted by LexusLover
The effect of the behavior establishes the baseline for an appropriate punishment, as other instances are memorialized and documented in the investigation by the DOJ AND AG. For those who prefer "due process" the "process" is just beginning.
bamscram's Avatar
So says the Supreme Parrot!

The case is now dismissed. Whether you want to believe it or not.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...s-bars-retrial Originally Posted by LexusLover
The effect of the behavior establishes the baseline for an appropriate punishment, as other instances are memorialized and documented in the investigation by the DOJ AND AG. For those who prefer "due process" the "process" is just beginning. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Since you are such a fan why don't you pay for the years of pasture rental he owes.
Do you know why states don't want to own that land?
LexusLover's Avatar
Since you are such a fan why don't you pay for the years of pasture rental he owes.
Do you know why states don't want to own that land? Originally Posted by bamscram
He doesn't owe any "pasture" rentals.

You've never dealt with the Bureau of Land Management have you?

It shows!

How do you think a NonCalifornia Western Plains jury would deal with the BLM and their hooligans? Just about the way the Judge did.
bamscram's Avatar
He doesn't owe any "pasture" rentals.

You've never dealt with the Bureau of Land Management have you?

It shows!

How do you think a NonCalifornia Western Plains jury would deal with the BLM and their hooligans? Just about the way the Judge did. Originally Posted by LexusLover
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/econo...cattle-grazing

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...107-story.html

You don't have any cattle so it is apparent you haven't.
LexusLover's Avatar
How would you know?

And I have dealt* with the BLM, ...

.... as well as neighbors about grazing/fencing and ingress/egress.

You just proved how much of parrot you really are!

You just squawk with no substance! You're a dumbass.

*Actually "dealt" is probably too strong a term. It was more like responding to them in writing and explaining they lacked the jurisdiction to tell me what to do and/or when to do it, and I would not be showing up at the "hearing" they were setting as they "ordered" me to do in their threatening letter. Perhaps it was the reference to their "enabling" statute and "regs" and a suggestion of the consequences of "taking" by the Government that led them to do nothing when I didn't appear. (And that may be the difference between "wanting" a confrontation and discouraging one!)

But parrots and pukes like you wouldn't know about that.
bamscram's Avatar
How would you know?

And I have dealt* with the BLM, ...

.... as well as neighbors about grazing/fencing and ingress/egress.

You just proved how much of parrot you really are!

You just squawk with no substance! You're a dumbass.

*Actually "dealt" is probably too strong a term. It was more like responding to them in writing and explaining they lacked the jurisdiction to tell me what to do and/or when to do it, and I would not be showing up at the "hearing" they were setting as they "ordered" me to do in their threatening letter. Perhaps it was the reference to their "enabling" statute and "regs" and a suggestion of the consequences of "taking" by the Government that led them to do nothing when I didn't appear. (And that may be the difference between "wanting" a confrontation and discouraging one!)

But parrots and pukes like you wouldn't know about that. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Makes you and Bundy buds then. You probably don't pay your bills either.
LexusLover's Avatar
Makes you and Bundy buds then. You probably don't pay your bills either. Originally Posted by bamscram
You sound more and more like a parrot.
Makes you and Bundy buds then. You probably don't pay your bills either. Originally Posted by bamscram
Wonder if HE honors HIS bets and DOESN'T WELSH ON THEM EKIM !
Hotrod511's Avatar
You sound more and more like a parrot. Originally Posted by LexusLover

which one is buttscramble the monkey or the parrot
So, now the judge has totally dismissed all charges cause of the DA's Malfeasance, WILL he go back and actually pursue proceedings against that prosecutor?
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
So, now the judge has totally dismissed all charges cause of the DA's Malfeasance, WILL he go back and actually pursue proceedings against that prosecutor? Originally Posted by garhkal
DOJ claims to have opened an investigation on that.
LexusLover's Avatar
So, now the judge has totally dismissed all charges cause of the DA's Malfeasance, WILL he go back and actually pursue proceedings against that prosecutor? Originally Posted by garhkal
Who is "he"?