For you maskerbators......

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Did you steal that from Mole, or did he lend it to you?

You’re too easy.

eye think he is telling everyone he likes fruit loops.


he's a fruit looper!!!

So I could walk around town and although I am not displaying any symptoms of disease I can still have Covid and can spread it. Do you really believe that? Originally Posted by Levianon17

As the studies have shown, this is real. And to be honest, I am more inclined to trust scientists than home-grown couch "experts" who, in the absence of specialized education, believe that they know the course of things better.

As the studies have shown, this is real. And to be honest, I am more inclined to trust scientists than home-grown couch "experts" who, in the absence of specialized education, believe that they know the course of things better. Originally Posted by Kay_B

Tell me about the studies, how were they conducted?

Some hardcore maskerbators;


https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/17885

So true!!!


https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/17929

You guys need to make up your mind. Was COVID 19 a bioweapon created by the Chinese and unleashed on their own people first?

Or something "the World Bank / IMF / The Rothschilds / World Economic Forum" came up with back before 2015? Originally Posted by Tiny

You may need to get your UserID-sized mind around a concept where the Chinese are the patsy for the globalist elites and your own government. eh?

As the studies have shown, this is real. And to be honest, I am more inclined to trust scientists than home-grown couch "experts" who, in the absence of specialized education, believe that they know the course of things better. Originally Posted by Kay_B

Long read with a gorillion links to all of the data in case you actually want to know what you are talking about. Color me pessimistic

How Asymptomatic COVID Spread Used to Lockdown the World Was Based on a Lie

Paul Elias Alexander, PhD, Former COVID Pandemic consultant/advisor to WHO-PAHO and former COVID pandemic advisor to Health and Human Services (HHS), United States; Parvez Dara, MD, MBA; Howard Tenenbaum, DDS, PhD.

We will start this discussion on the corruption of ‘asymptomatic spread’ by stating emphatically, that there should be no vaccination of our children with these COVID vaccines. Zero. These vaccines have no long-term safety assessments, and they are working not alike the classical vaccines.

We are talking about vaccinating millions of healthy infants, children, and adolescents, and we know the risk is not substantial in terms of acquiring the infection and going on to become severely ill or dying.

The risk of severe outcome in infants, young children, and young persons is very low and essentially statistical zero (risk of survival persons 0-19 is 99.997%). Yet the potential risks of these vaccines to children can be catastrophic. Thus the basic question is, why would we subject our child to a vaccine that provides them with no benefit?...

Think about what might be lurking in your mask the next time you put one on.


The analysis by the University of Florida's Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center found the following dangerous pathogens:

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs— resistant to antibiotics)
Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires' disease)
Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)
Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)
Less dangerous pathogens also were identified, including those that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever.

The masks studied were new or freshly laundered before they were worn for five to eight hours by children aged 6 through 11. One was worn by an adult.

A T-shirt worn by one of the children at school and unworn masks were tested as controls. No pathogens were found on the controls.

Study: Mask mandates don't slow spread

A recent study by the University of Louisville found that state mask mandates did not help slow the spread of COVID-19.

The researchers found that "masks may promote social cohesion as rallying symbols during a pandemic, but risk compensation can also occur."

Among the risks:

Prolonged mask use, more than four hours a day,
"promotes facial alkalinization and inadvertently encourages dehydration, which in turn can enhance barrier breakdown and bacterial infection risk."
British clinicians have reported masks to increase headaches and sweating and decrease cognitive precision.
By obscuring nonverbal communication, masks interfere with social learning in children.
Likewise, masks can distort verbal speech and remove visual cues to the detriment of individuals with hearing loss.
Current guidance from the CDC states that masks "are a simple barrier to help prevent your respiratory droplets from reaching others" and "studies show that masks reduce the spray of droplets when worn over the nose and mouth."

Recently, the CDC updated its guidance to allow for fully vaccinated individuals to ditch their masks, a revision that has led to several states and companies updating their mask mandates to allow the same.

The first large, randomized controlled trial of its kind showed no statistically significant difference in COVID-19 cases between people who wore masks and those who did not.

yeah... I saw that article about the mask study. that one was a head shaker!

Part of the big lie masks gonna save us all

First place prize to the one that can provide links to at least three studies that say paper and/or cloth masks prevent the spread of respiratory viruses from aerosols in a non-surgical environment that is dated 2019 or earlier.
Go!

Well Yes, not sure anyone ever said paper or cloth masks prevent spread from aerosols and was not the intent.

They do provide protection (not 100%, but what is?) from spread of droplets containing viral particles to others. Those studies have been posted previously as you probably remember. Do your own research if your memory fails.

N95 masks are much better at preventing aerosol borne viral spread both to others and the wearer. Positive pressure apparati are the gold standard. Neither are practical for "public" general use.

... Do your own research if your memory fails... Originally Posted by reddog1951

I remember that you have decided to take a pass on the challenge question.

The rest of your interlude seems almost totally lifted (paraphrased) from the Abstract of: Effectiveness of Cloth Masks for Protection Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, published on the CDC website as - Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020

Seems my fuzzy memory ain't so fuzzy wuzzy

Trick question when posted. You know that...as do I.