Trump's red line

Let me see. So far we have you pointing at post 81 like a fool when we all see the post you made the foolish assertion you are denying said.
Then we have the old "I am so fucking sure" I know all about you but will not bet because of some lame excuse that several have called you on.
Now after running your mouth about not saying anything about him being not able to bomb us you are saying he needs one to do it. But have all but said we need to bomb him before he bombs us.
Apparently your mind is the proverbial Schrodinger's cat.
Everything seems to be or not be according to what suits you at the time. So tell again, does Kim have a bomb or did have a bomb or when he had a bomb or said he had a bomb. And remember this simple concept, you need a bomb to dtop a bomb. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

It was you that posted #81. When I busted you on it, you edited trying to be cute. But you erase my quote. So your a lying imbecile. You also said NK did not drop bombs on us when Clinton, Bush, and Obama were in office. There's a simple reaso for that which I pointed out to your stupid ass. It's because those Presidents did nothing to stop NoKo from developing the capabilities to bomb the US. They now have that capability you imbecile. Now, try again and produce one of my posts that says NK can't bomb the US. You. cant because it doesn't exist you lying Cocksucker.

What do you suggest?

War?

Next , Trump did his Transgendered tweet they day he found out Paul Manafort house.

Diversion. No consultation with the Brass. Diversion.

Now North Korea....he is trying to divert from the Russia investigation.

He is playing with soldiers lives so you on the far right will not find out what the rest of us see.

Originally Posted by WTF

Trump's tweet maintaining the status quo in regards to transgendered individuals was at the behest of Congressmen bogged down with DoD funding legislation ... not 'diversion'.

Inside Trump’s snap decision to ban transgender troops

House Republicans were planning to pass a spending bill stacked with his campaign promises, including money to build his border wall with Mexico.

But an internal House Republican fight over transgender troops was threatening to blow up the bill. And House GOP insiders feared they might not have the votes to pass the legislation because defense hawks wanted a ban on Pentagon-funded sex reassignment operations — something GOP leaders wouldn’t give them.

They turned to Trump, who didn’t hesitate. In the flash of a tweet, he announced that transgender troops would be banned altogether.

(Politico)

Trump's tweet maintaining the status quo in regards to transgendered individuals was at the behest of Congressmen bogged down with DoD funding legislation ... not 'diversion'. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No order from Trump, so there is no official change....just a tweet is all congress needed?

And At just that moment when his former Campaign Chairman's house was being raided.

Things that make you ho hmmmmm.

So to recap. ...without consulting with the military (Which he lied about) you think this was a request from congress.

Another thought.....why would Trump need money for a wall. Mexico is going to pay for that wall, right?

Looks like Trump is the new Gruber!

I0

No order....just a tweet is all congress needed.

At just that moment when his former Campaign Chairman's house was being raided.

Things that make you ho hmmmmm.

So to recap. ...without consulting with the military (Which he lied about) you think this was a request from congress.

Another.....why would Trump need money for a wall. Mexico is going to pay for that wall, right?

Looks like Trump is the new Gruber!

I0 Originally Posted by WTF

It will take more than a tweet, but he has until January to back it up with an EO or legislation. January was the suspense date set by Mattis in June postponing Odumbo policy's effective date ... before Trump's tweet.

So what now, jerkall? Light 'em up? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So what do YOU suggest, jackoff? Snooze for another 5 years while the punk fatboy builds out an arsenal of 400 nuclear-tipped ICBMs in his little concentration camp the size of Pennsylvania?

What could possibly go wrong with that scenario, pigfuck?

If some nukes hit American cities would you complain that Trump didn't stop it by taking out the fat asshole leader Originally Posted by Stockinglover

FIFTH REQUEST TO THE OP (SNITCHFUCK): WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO ANSWER STOCKINGLOVER'S SIMPLE AND DIRECT QUESTION THAT WAS ADDRESSED TO YOU WAY BACK IN POST #2 ???

So what do YOU suggest, jackoff? Snooze for another 5 years while the punk fatboy builds out an arsenal of 400 nuclear-tipped ICBMs in his little concentration camp the size of Pennsylvania?

What could possibly go wrong with that scenario, pigfuck? Originally Posted by lustylad

The PIG wants us to follow Obamas strategy. NoKo was sending their nuclear technology to Iran while Obama was giving them billions of dollars!!! Shrewd guy that Obama was. BTW, the governor of Guam is happy that Trump is talking tough on the fat boy. He's in the crosshairs.

FIFTH REQUEST TO THE OP (SNITCHFUCK): WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO ANSWER STOCKINGLOVER'S SIMPLE AND DIRECT QUESTION THAT WAS ADDRESSED TO YOU WAY BACK IN POST #2 ??? Originally Posted by lustylad

Every request you make a Syrian baby in heaven gets his/her wings!

Here is my answer dicklicker...GWB/IRAQ WAR

Every request you make a Syrian baby in heaven gets his/her wings!

Here is my answer dicklicker...GWB/IRAQ WAR Originally Posted by WTF

Your ex's quit requesting hard ons from you. They grew wings and moved on!!!!

It was you that posted #81. When I busted you on it, you edited trying to be cute. But you erase my quote. So your a lying imbecile. You also said NK did not drop bombs on us when Clinton, Bush, and Obama were in office. There's a simple reaso for that which I pointed out to your stupid ass. It's because those Presidents did nothing to stop NoKo from developing the capabilities to bomb the US. They now have that capability you imbecile. Now, try again and produce one of my posts that says NK can't bomb the US. You. cant because it doesn't exist you lying Cocksucker. Originally Posted by bambino

Where did I erase your quote?
You say there is a simple "reaso" (reason I assume), well what is it?
NK had them when Clinton was in office. That is why he made the deal with them that fell through. Are you that stupid?
I already showed where you said he could not hit us if he tried dumbass. You can talk about post 81 all you want, bottom line is the link I posted shows you did.

So when are we gonna bet? Are you mad cause I do not take food stamps at my "Business"? I would not have you as a customer even if you had cash.

NK had them when Clinton was in office. That is why he made the deal with them that fell through. Are you that stupid? Originally Posted by MT Pockets

This is why it is so exasperating to let idiots like MT Cranium chime in on any serious foreign policy discussion... Trailer trashboy doesn't even understand the difference between being able to enrich uranium and having a working nuclear weapon.

Here is my answer dicklicker...GWB/IRAQ WAR Originally Posted by WTF

Don't stop there... don't be chickenshit... if you have a valid point to make, keep going!

Your ex's quit requesting hard ons from you. They grew wings and moved on!!!! Originally Posted by bambino

You're just mad because in 12 - 14 years you will not be able to date them! Fucking Pissburg Perv.

This is why it is so exasperating to let idiots like MT Cranium chime in on any serious foreign policy discussion... Trailer trashboy doesn't even understand the difference between being able to enrich uranium and having a working nuclear weapon. Originally Posted by lustylad

So does that mean you think Hans Blix was lying?, or Jasper Becker?

A recent ad on the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
website opened with the words, “Security Under Bush and GOP?” It
claimed “North Korea has quadrupled its nuclear arsenal,” and included
footage of a tank and North Korea President Kim Jong Il. The ad
ended, “Feel safer? Vote for change.” Democrats have been hoping
we’ll all completely forget history. Yes, North Korea is an incredibly
dangerous nuclear member of the axis of evil, and for that we can thank
Bill Clinton:
In the spring of 1992 brutal North Korean dictator Kim Il Sung
allowed International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] inspectors, led
by none other than Hans Blix, into his country. Kim claimed they
had “a tiny quantity [of plutonium] … far from the amount you
need for a weapon,” reported Blix, according to The Washington Post.
But covert tests showed that the North Koreans had actually
reprocessed massive amounts of plutonium — enough for several
bombs, reports Jasper Becker in the definitive Rogue Regime (Oxford
University Press). When the IAEA asked for access to nuclear waste
sites to investigate further, the North Koreans balked.
In 1993, North Korea declared it would withdraw from the NonProliferation
Treaty [NPT] unless certain demands were met: “U.S.
diplomatic recognition, the end of economic sanctions, one million
tons in grain, half a million tons of fuel oil per year … and the delivery
of two light-water reactors worth over $4.5 billion. The Koreans
were quite specific about the sort of reactors they wanted and only
these would do.” notes Becker. Absurd.
By 1994, tensions between North Korea, South Korea, the IAEA, the
UN, and the U.S. were mounting; actual military conflict loomed.
But then, a savior appeared. Yes, the Clinton Administration sent in
none other than Jimmy Carter, who Kim Il Sung once referred to
as “a man of justice,” to take a swing at peace — but only as a private
citizen. (Clinton was worried about looking “weak” with the
ex-presidential help.)
From June 16 to 19, 1994, Carter rubbed elbows with Kim for a few
days and then “dropped American demands that UN inspections
resume and that North Korea surrender its spent fuel rods …
[Carter] even said that the U.S. was dropping its support for sanctions
at the UN, which wasn’t true,” writes Stephen Hayward in The
Real Jimmy Carter (Regnery). Without the Clinton Administration’s
knowledge, Carter then popped up on CNN declaring he sweettalked
Kim into going back to the negotiating table in Geneva.
It was at the Geneva talks that the Clinton Administration bent over
and grabbed the ankles, despite the death of Kim Il Sung on July 8,
1994 (at which time his wacko son Kim Jong Il inherited “supreme
power”). The “Agreed Framework” was signed by the United States
and North Korea on Oct. 21, 1994 in Geneva. The Framework
promised, as Becker put it, “to reward Pyongyang’s breaches of international
nuclear safeguards by giving it more nuclear power stations.”
Yes, the Clinton Administration gave in to the demands
of a deceiving, nefarious, nuclear-hungry, gulag-building, peoplestarving,
Communist regime.
Not only were the nuclear reactors pledged; Clinton also agreed to
supply the North with 500,000 metric tons of fuel oil annually, as
well as tons of grain — all in return for a promise to “freeze” all
nuclear-weaponry ambitions. Clinton even provided the North
Koreans, writes Becker, “with a written assurance that the United
States was not contemplating launching an attack [or] seeking the
destruction of North Korea.” Kim was home free.
How could North Korea experience one of history’s deadliest famines
during the 90s while receiving tons of grain/aid from America? The
U.S., as Newsweek reports, “did not know where most of the food was
going after military trucks hauled it away.” Turns out, most of the
food went to the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea [DPRK] army,
and Clinton happily looked the other way, eager to shore up his reputation
for “diplomacy” and “engagement” with adversaries.
The Clinton Administration’s 1995 National Intelligence Estimate
flatly stated that “no country, other than the major declared nuclear
powers, will develop or otherwise acquire a ballistic missile in the next
15 years that could threaten the contiguous 48 states and Canada.”
By Feb. 1997, Madeleine Albright had officially shrugged off any
concerns about North Korean deception, bragging: “The Framework
Agreement is one of the best things the [Clinton] Administration has
done because it stopped a nuclear weapons program in North Korea.”
On Aug. 31, 1998, North Korea launched a three-stage Taepo
Dong-1 rocket, with a range of 1,500-2,000 kilometers, over Japan,
landing off the Alaska coast.
During a 1999 Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing,
Albright made a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it admission that things
weren’t rosy in Agreed-Framework-land: “We are also engaged in
direct talks with North Korea on ways to resolve concerns regarding
suspicious underground construction activities and long-range missile
programs.”
In 2000, mounting evidence at the underground Kumchang-ri
site forced the Clinton Administration to actually confront the
possibility that their Agreed Framework was, well, a load of poppycock.
They asked Kim Jong Il to allow inspections. Kim refused. So
Clinton sent him 600,000 tons of grain.
In June 2000, the Japanese and Chinese were able to confirm reports
of another underground uranium processing plant in Choma, about
17 miles away from Kumchang-ri.
The final Clintonian gesture was to send Albright herself over
to Pyongyang in Oct. 2000 on a first-ever official U.S. visit (granting
Kim Jong Il his long-sought-after legitimacy). Nothing was
actually accomplished, but Kim and Maddy clinked wine glasses
and exchanged starry eyes. As Albright told PBS’s Jim Leher:
“Basically, you know, we’ve had such weird stories about him, but it
turns out that we had very good discussions…. And he seems pragmatic
… not hostile.”
Guess what the North Koreans admitted to in 2002? “[P]ursuing a
secret nuclear weapons program using enriched uranium in violation of
its 1994 pledge to freeze its nuclear program,” reported The Los Angeles
Times. “A senior official later acknowledged that the Communist
nation was pursuing the nuclear weapons program ‘and more.’”
But don’t expect the Clinton crowd to take responsibility for nuking up
one of the world’s most evil regimes. Here’s a Sept. 12, 2004 exchange
between Albright and Tim Russert on NBC’s “Meet the Press”:
Russert: But didn’t North Korea develop a nuclear bomb on Bill
Clinton’s watch?
Albright: No, what they were doing, as it turns out, they were cheating
… The worst part that has happened under the Agreed Framework,
there was [sic] these fuel rods, and the nuclear program was frozen.
Those fuel rods have now been reprocessed, as far as we know, and
North Korea has a [nuclear] capability.”
Cheating? The North Koreans? Who’da th

1. One should never draw lines...ijs

2. Having said that, I wouldn't consider any words from noko as a "threat"....their words mean nothing to me.

3. Actions.....threat. maybe even preparatory actions like mobilizing equipment. You know our satelittes have real time capabilities.


4. I primarily blame Bill Clinton for this predicament. We should bomb his ass.