Political Discussion thread

I dont ever quote you though, doove,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i ts the other way around Originally Posted by JONBALLS

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...3&postcount=49

And whether you "quote" me or not, you sure do mention my name an awful lot.

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=19231020&pp=25

on our end its called LAUGHING at you

Chicken or egg, i suppose.

by 6 minutes

As harsh as this may sound, the reality is if you take the whole "God" thing to it's logical conclusion, he's right. Originally Posted by Doove

I was just thinking the same thing. Who knows, God may have planned it for the kid to be the next Einstein, though a heathen like me would say, in probability, the kid would be more likely to turn out to be another Manson. But maybe that's god's plan, 20 mansons for 1 einstein through rape. I wonder what buddha's plan is for impregnation through rape is? Rasta? He who shall be nameless(native indian and my personal favorite)? The greek god apollo ( he probably only knows about raping little boys)?
When politicians invoke god, I think they should specify which one of these" higher beings" they are referring to. There's quite a number of them and they all have different stories, so it gets a bit confusing. If the politician wanted to invoke the native indian god he'd be in a bit of a bind because, of course, he ( or she) is nameless.

My times vary depending on my schedule. Or is that too obvious?

I enjoy watching those on the religious right claiming to speak, not just about God, but for God, whoever that is.

its Tebow

I enjoy watching those on the religious right claiming to speak, not just about God, but for God, whoever that is. Originally Posted by jackfengshui

And God is probably rolling his eyes as they speak!! You know Jesus used to hang out with the Whores, so who knows one of us may be Jesus re-incarnate.

You called?

Part of my problem? What problem would that be, exactly?



In other words, you just don't get it. Fair enough...i won't quibble.

As an aside, note the idiocy of blackjedi's comments. Perhaps it'll come to ya.



Given some of your comments, i think there's probably more truth there than you intended.
Originally Posted by Doove

What I meant as far as your problem goes is you may be misunderstood because of your avatar. It's just a bit creepy for me. Maybe that's why there is such a dislike towards you. Other than your points of view.


As far as me liking my women upside down and my pleasure in a standing 69, this is a hobby and we should do what we like. And I enjoy that. It's different for the girls as not too many guys do this and a great visual in a mirror.


Now back to the political discussion. I noticed you didn't mention anything about the new info about the failed belief that relationships were normalized in the region and no additional security was required. And now e-mails were leaked about just what was known hours after the attack started. Doove, Jack and any other liberals out there have any concerns over these new facts? And don't give me this we need to finish the investigation BS. They know every single fact that there is by now. It happened 6 weeks ago. It's either a cover up or incompetence. Either way, it should concern every American out there no matter what your political affiliation is.

heh

now that Dr Savage has a new show. How long before Doove quotes Savage????

...your avatar. It's just a bit creepy for me. Maybe that's why there is such a dislike towards you. Other than your points of view. Originally Posted by montana1958

Funny. No, there was a dislike towards me when my avatar consisted of the hands of 2 female lesbians clenched together in a moment of passion.

And really, if my avatar rubs people the wrong way, then it's probably because they deserve the mockery it's intended to convey.

Now back to the political discussion. I noticed you didn't mention anything about the new info about the failed belief that relationships were normalized in the region and no additional security was required.

Oh, i guess you just didn't do a good enough job of baiting me into responding.

And now e-mails were leaked about just what was known hours after the attack started. Doove, Jack and any other liberals out there have any concerns over these new facts?

The only new facts are that emails were released. Emails of very preliminary (meaning same day) intelligence regarding what was going on. Those emails, as is often the case with very preliminary (meaning same day) intelligence, were ultimately not accurate. So if they would have based any comments on those emails, they would have been saying things that were based on falsehoods. And, of course, Rush Limbaugh would be ripping them for that.

And don't give me this we need to finish the investigation BS.

At least you'd think you could let them get passed day 1 of the investigation. But no. Not in your world.

They know every single fact that there is by now. It happened 6 weeks ago. It's either a cover up or incompetence. Either way, it should concern every American out there no matter what your political affiliation is.

Given that 4 people tragically died, i guess that makes me about 1/744th as concerned and outraged as i was over the cover up and/or incompetence over what was known prior to the 9/11/01 attacks.

How 'boutchoo?

Someone needs to teach doove how to quote better so we know who he is quoting. Better yet, don't... Anytime he starts his mass quoting, I pretty much get a case of IDGAF.

Any time it's not noted that someone new is being quoted, the same person is being quoted.

Not difficult.

For most.

Any time it's not noted that someone new is being quoted, the same person is being quoted.

Not difficult.

For most. Originally Posted by Doove

For you it apparently is. But that's ok, most people here don't expect a lot out of you.