Your reading comprehension is like most liberals. You ignore information that refutes your claims or you do like the media and cheery pick information to fit your talking points. I.B. showed you in an a earlier post ( and cited the sources ! ) that funding WAS NOT a problem for the mission at Benghazi. It even sites a member of Shrillary's management answering direct questions from congressmen and saying that it WASN'T a problem. Has banging all those cetaceans worn you out to the point that you can't think or read anymore ? Have they been sitting on your pimply face and cutting off your air for too long ? !!! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
ur an angry little cunt aren't you.
Defense costs money, someone said they had enough funds, and Democrats requested more funding because they believed the threat called for more security, republicans refused. this are facts. Seems like a disagreement on whether more funding was needed, I believe more funding WAS needed, u can disagree if u like.
Im gonna guess if the tables were turned and republicans asked for more funding and dems blocked it, then the attacks happened that u would not say funding was not a problem, hypocrite.