A Toy Drive in Connection with the Gentleman's Club Holiday Party

Speed racer, the answer is no. It was mentioned in another thread....

Sixx

I just think there has been some incredible generosity in this drive.
Sure, there are prizes, but 7 winners out of 50 or more attendees does not assure anyone of winning any prize. Originally Posted by ezman

All I know is that if I don't win a date with a hot chick, I'll be devastated.

I'll probably tell everybody that it had to be rigged.

And then I'll go back to sucking on a bag of lemons as I masturbate furiously in my cold, dark, lonely room.

Trust me, in my travails I've found that my own snot and tears make excellent personal lube.

Though technically, I guess it wouldn't be vegan, since it's an animal product and derived from the pain and suffering of a living creature.

But at least it does put a tiny bit of a silver lining on living with my allergies when I'm feeling randy. There's always a little bit more where the last load came from. I really look forward to cedar fever season every year.

LOL...that is nasty Carl...my luggies are gross..

When one is selecting lube for beating the meat, it's not about taste or appearances, it's about friction and functionality.

Buddy, if you ever associate any type of sex paid or unpaid with children you will rightfully be put through the federal prison system; and believe me, if such a thing ever happens to you, the sentence per se will be the least of your worries, as the worst of rapists and murderers themselves have little forgiveness of child abuse.. Originally Posted by Raphael

I'm going to go ahead and accuse you of willful misinterpretation. Raffling off dates to raise toys for a toy drive does not expose (or associate whatever that means to you) children to anything. At all. The toys don't get magically tainted by evil lustful corrupting energy.

You can write, so you probably have the mental faculties to understand this, but are trying to make some incomprehensible moral stand against what? Mixing commercialism and charity? Pay4play? The position that somehow those two things together are worse than when taken seperately?

The first is broadly socially accepted and I have not heard a rational objection. It is maybe one of the few good things to come of PR.

The second makes you a hypocrite and probably one very conflicted whoremonger, though perhaps your rationalization skills are up for the task.

The third makes no sense at all.

It seems to me that Raphael needs to MAKE SURE nothing bad happens. After all his trash talk and BS threats, IF anything happens, he's the first one I would turn to for sure. Can you say RAT?@?@

Dude Carl TMI!!! Lol didn't need to know that.....

as if one rat was not enough...

Please lock this thread. Seems the haters are getting too much attention and people can't stick to the subject matter.

Closed per OP request....

Sixx