patraeus resigns

Ekim the Inbred remains an ignorant fuck who cannot discern the kernel thought in a simple sentence. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Poor IB you got nothing....

Ekim the Inbred remains an ignorant fuck who cannot discern the kernel thought in a simple sentence. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Poor IB you got nothing...

Ekim the Inbred remains an ignorant fuck who cannot discern the kernel thought in a simple sentence.

didn't catch that. Please say it again...

LL, who was the last Democratic nominee for President that you supported? Originally Posted by bigtex

Again, is that how you determine party affliiation?

Again, is that how you determine party affliiation? Originally Posted by LexusLover

There are numerous ways to determine party affiliation, such as: signs in the yard, working for your political party's candidates, voting in primary elections, etc. Yes, voting for your proclaimed party's candidates, presidential or otherwise, would also be included!

Here in Texas (and I presume elsewhere) both political party's have access to your recent voting history which helps them pinpoint past voting history data. Such data includes whether you voted in a primary election and if so, which primary (Democrat or Republican) you voted in. In other words, some may have voted in the Democratic Primary in 2008 and Republican since. If so, that information can easily be attained by the two political party's.

It stands to reason that someone who has repeatedly bragged about being a Democrat would occasionally support the Democratic candidate for President. I personally do not recall you having written anything favorable about any of the recent Democratic Presidential candidates, (Clinton, Kerry or Obama), that would lead me to believe that you supported any of those three.

Just wondering! Have you supported a Democratic Presidential candidate since Truman? Or did you even support ol' Give 'em Hell Harry (my personal favorite Democrat). I suppose it is entirely possible that the last Democratic Presidential candidate you supported was Al Smith in 1928. In any event, which Democratic Presidential candidate did you last support? If you feel it violates your privacy, don't tell us the specific Democratic Presidential candidate you supported, just tell us the decade it occurred. That should suffice, don't ya think?

This whole story is getting stranger and stranger. The FBI was investigating this shit? Eric Cantor knew, but nobody told the white house??

WTF is going on?

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/20...chM/story.html

It is OBVIOUS that Gen Petraeus was a Republican sleeper in the Obama administration designed to bring down the President if the Republicans lost the election. Oh, yeah, that doesn't make much sense because the Republicans couldn't conceive that they could lose this election. Oh, well, I'm sure it was some kind of nefarious Republican plot and Gen Petraeus took one for the team while getting some good nookie. Wouldn't any one of us sign up for that service?

There are numerous ways to determine party affiliation, such as: signs in the yard, working for your political party's candidates, voting in primary elections, etc. Yes, voting for your proclaimed party's candidates, presidential or otherwise, would also be included!

? Originally Posted by bigtex

Which do you think is LL biggest wopper in this thread.

That he is a Democrat or that Obama has a 45 million dollar retirement home?

It is OBVIOUS that Gen Petraeus was a Republican sleeper in the Obama administration designed to bring down the President if the Republicans lost the election. Oh, yeah, that doesn't make much sense because the Republicans couldn't conceive that they could lose this election. Oh, well, I'm sure it was some kind of nefarious Republican plot and Gen Petraeus took one for the team while getting some good nookie. Wouldn't any one of us sign up for that service? Originally Posted by austxjr

LOL...I can't understand how our righties can thinkLibya and the FBI investigation are related. Nothing and I mean nothing points in that direction. But then I do not see how these silly fuckets think Obama was not born in Hawaii. I really need to invest more in Tin Foil!

Which do you think is LL biggest wopper in this thread.

That he is a Democrat or that Obama has a 45 million dollar retirement home? Originally Posted by WTF

Is it ok if I vote for both?

L I really need to invest more in Tin Foil! Originally Posted by WTF

Tin Foil stock is soaring right now!

The general doesn't want to take the fall for Benghazi like he was being set up for......it's about time he took the honorable path.......his biggest mistake was becoming part of Bath House Barry's administration.....he should have just retired or stayed in the Army.....he was stupid, so fuck em......

Is it ok if I vote for both?


Originally Posted by bigmex

GOES BOTH WAYS! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

(CNN) -- Unlike many stories about powerful Washington figures having secret affairs, the downfall of spy chief David Petraeus goes beyond sex.
The scandal surrounding the decorated four-star Army general who once ran the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan involves questions of national security, politics and even the September 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead.
Petraeus, 60, resigned Friday after acknowledging he had an affair with a woman later identified as his biographer, Paula Broadwell, 40, a fellow West Point graduate who spent months studying the general's leadership of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
Why does it matter? Security and Benghazi
While affairs may be commonplace in Washington, when they involve the director of the CIA, things can take on a different tone.
Analysts say there is no evidence that a security breach occurred as a result of the affair, but that hasn't stopped discussion that Broadwell could have gained access to classified information as a result of what she has routinely described as "unprecedented access" to Petraeus.
That discussion seemed to gain momentum Monday thanks to comments Broadwell made in a speech last month at the University of Denver.
"I don't know if a lot of you have heard this, but the CIA annex had actually taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner and they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to get these prisoners back," Broadwell said.
A senior intelligence official told CNN on Monday, "These detention claims are categorically not true. Nobody was ever held at the annex before, during, or after the attacks."
Broadwell's source for that previously unpublished bit of information remains unclear, and there's no evidence so far that it came from Petraeus. Administration officials have said the Benghazi assault was a terrorist attack.

Is it ok if I vote for both? Originally Posted by bigtex