- Yssup Rider
- 01-13-2013, 11:10 PM
Sf looked REAL good yesterday. Kaepernick is the real deal...
- Yssup Rider
- 01-13-2013, 11:26 PM
I don't imagine you did watch football.
The Texans got their asses handed to them for the fifth time this season, which is about as often as you get your ass handed to you every day, boy!
The Texans got their asses handed to them for the fifth time this season, which is about as often as you get your ass handed to you every day, boy!
- CuteOldGuy
- 01-13-2013, 11:34 PM
I don't know much about football. I'm a Kansas City Chiefs fan.
But I'm picking the 49ers now.
But I'm picking the 49ers now.
- MrGiz
- 01-13-2013, 11:46 PM
- Yssup Rider
- 01-14-2013, 12:07 AM
- CuteOldGuy
- 01-14-2013, 12:14 AM
- Chica Chaser
- 01-14-2013, 03:02 AM
So far, so good on mine
SF vs Houstonhttp://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=20815314
Houston takes it. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser
- Guest040616
- 01-14-2013, 06:25 AM
- Jackie S
- 01-14-2013, 09:22 AM
Well, so much for my picks, Seattle or Denver to take it all was mine.
If Seattle's defensive coordinator has a job this morning, I don't know how. Atlanta has, arguably, the best kicker in the league, esspecially in that Dome To go into that stupid "prevent defense" and let Ryan complete two passes in a row to get them to the 40 was insane.
And then they even gave him a practice kick. Heads should roll.
If Seattle's defensive coordinator has a job this morning, I don't know how. Atlanta has, arguably, the best kicker in the league, esspecially in that Dome To go into that stupid "prevent defense" and let Ryan complete two passes in a row to get them to the 40 was insane.
And then they even gave him a practice kick. Heads should roll.
- WTF
- 01-14-2013, 09:39 AM
Well at least the Seahawks coverd and made WTF a ton of $$$$ for the second week in a row!
I think the niners will roll the Falcons.
Can't see the Ravens beating NE but then again, I did not see them beating Denver. To big a line for me to touch but I think San Fran will pay for me a nice week at Pebble Beach! If not it is the local Munny for WTF....
I think the niners will roll the Falcons.
Can't see the Ravens beating NE but then again, I did not see them beating Denver. To big a line for me to touch but I think San Fran will pay for me a nice week at Pebble Beach! If not it is the local Munny for WTF....
- Chica Chaser
- 01-14-2013, 02:02 PM
Well at least the Seahawks coverd and made WTF a ton of $$$$ for the second week in a row!Agreed with all the above. Meet you at PB, then down to Torrey Pines!
I think the niners will roll the Falcons.
Can't see the Ravens beating NE but then again, I did not see them beating Denver. To big a line for me to touch but I think San Fran will pay for me a nice week at Pebble Beach! If not it is the local Munny for WTF.... Originally Posted by WTF
- Jackie S
- 01-14-2013, 04:17 PM
I have a question about a call yesterday.
On the Seahawks last touchdown, there was the review to see if he broke the plain of the goal line, therefore making the fumble a moot point.
But, was that even a fumble. If they had ruled against Seattle, could not their coach come back and say that it was a lateral, since the ball went straight back, was not overhand, and into the arms of that lineman, never touching the ground, who ran it over untouched.
I looked up the definition of a lateral, and no where does it say in the rule that the player has to intentionally lateral the ball. It just states that it must be either directly parallel to the runner or behind, not forward.
It's all a moot point, because they did say he broke the plain. Just curious.
On the Seahawks last touchdown, there was the review to see if he broke the plain of the goal line, therefore making the fumble a moot point.
But, was that even a fumble. If they had ruled against Seattle, could not their coach come back and say that it was a lateral, since the ball went straight back, was not overhand, and into the arms of that lineman, never touching the ground, who ran it over untouched.
I looked up the definition of a lateral, and no where does it say in the rule that the player has to intentionally lateral the ball. It just states that it must be either directly parallel to the runner or behind, not forward.
It's all a moot point, because they did say he broke the plain. Just curious.
- skirtchaser79411
- 01-14-2013, 09:33 PM
i do not give a rats ass who wins. i just want the final score to end in 9 and 2 and i will clean up
- Chica Chaser
- 01-15-2013, 12:15 AM
I have a question about a call yesterday.I would have to look it up exactly, but the NFL created a new rule a couple years ago. It basically says the in the last X mins of a game (or maybe overtime games) the guy advancing the ball has to be the one to carry it into the endzone. No laterals allowed.
On the Seahawks last touchdown, there was the review to see if he broke the plain of the goal line, therefore making the fumble a moot point.
But, was that even a fumble. If they had ruled against Seattle, could not their coach come back and say that it was a lateral, since the ball went straight back, was not overhand, and into the arms of that lineman, never touching the ground, who ran it over untouched.
I looked up the definition of a lateral, and no where does it say in the rule that the player has to intentionally lateral the ball. It just states that it must be either directly parallel to the runner or behind, not forward.
It's all a moot point, because they did say he broke the plain. Just curious. Originally Posted by Jackie S
- WhoAreWe
- 01-15-2013, 01:08 PM
ONE TEAM
HA HA
RANDMAN
+
++
+++
++++
+++++
++++
+++
++
+
++
+++
++++
+++++
++++
+++
++
+
HA HA
RANDMAN
+
++
+++
++++
+++++
++++
+++
++
+
++
+++
++++
+++++
++++
+++
++
+