Are all trump party members stuck in a time warp?
Your article dated April of 2018 about the cover up of by the trump party House Intelligence committee is missing a number of facts since it was published.
#1. Every intelligence agency of the United States all agree the Russians interfered in the 2016 election
So did the Nunes report which I just showed you
#2. The Senate Intelligence Committee has issued a report agreeing with the United States intelligence agencies in Oct of 2019.
So did the Nunes report which I just showed you.
#3. The conviction of Roger Stone is leading to probable perjury charges for trump regarding his obstruction of the Mueller report.
Here's a helpful hint, don't include the word "probable" when you are implying matters of fact
#4 The Crowdstrike conspiracy bullshit is being exposed as Russian propaganda.
The Crowdstrike conspiracy is being "proposed" as Russian propaganda. What we do know for a fact is that the Democratic party would not allow the FBI to see that server and we are all just suppose to take the word of Crowdstrike as to who did the hacking. We know for a fact that the ability to make a hack by "someone" look like a hack from somebody else does exist and we know that these hacking tools "escaped" the control of the NSA years ago.
https://hackernoon.com/wikileaks-vau...s-883f87828211
What was once conspiracy is now fact, as it appears the CIA has essentially developed their own NSA without the oversight. Under the Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), over 5,000 hackers have produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware targeting everything from anti-virus software to commonly used consumer devices. This includes malware which makes it look like it was planted by a foreign government or hacker. This includes Russia, essentially proving the CIA has the ability to plant evidence to make it look like Russian hackers were the culprits. This potentially disrupts and discredits the entire Russia hacking narrative being pushed by the media.
There’s a lot more facts that have been published since April of 2018, but the big fact is the trump sycophants ignore all facts. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
This is what Ukraine’s ‘interference’ looked like, according to Republicans
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ge%2Fstory-ans
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
As the 2017 Politico article notes, the piecemeal efforts by Ukrainian individuals to potentially influence the 2016 election “were far less concerted or centrally directed” than what the Russian government explicitly engaged in.
#1. Every intelligence agency of the United States all agree the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to benefit the fat lying bastard squatting in the Oval Office.
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
You might want to listen carefully to what Dr. Hill said. She did not say as you just did that the Russians tried to benefit Trump, they tried to de-legitimize the election so that whoever won would have questions to answer.And here in the real world in the year 2019 she actually accused the freedom caucus of promoting Russian propaganda and division. Like the Crowdstrike conspiracy bullshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch
Wes Savage
For all of you people who don’t actually understand what she is saying. She is saying the Russians were actually going to delegitimize any person who got elected, regardless of party. They were going to divide the nation and pit the country against itself in order to weaken us as a whole, which unfortunately they have succeeded in doing. Turn off the tv and the smart phone, walk outside and actually talk Originally Posted by HedonistForever
House GOP defends Trump’s actions on Ukraine in dismissing impeachment probeBe advised this article was actually written in December 2019
House Republicans said Monday that President Trump acted out of “genuine” concern about corruption in Ukraine and wariness about foreign aid in their defense of the president’s actions and as a preemptive rebuttal to Democratic allegations that Trump abused his power — grounds for expected articles of impeachment.
In a 123-page draft report, GOP investigators assert that Democrats failed to make the case that Trump committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by withholding military aid and a highly sought-after White House meeting to compel Ukraine to launch investigations into his political opponents.
Nor, the Republicans say, do Democrats have a basis for impeachment in Trump’s decision to spurn House document requests and witness subpoenas pertaining to Trump’s Ukraine dealings.
Instead, the draft GOP report contends, the impeachment effort is “an orchestrated campaign to upend our political system” — one “based on the accusations and assumptions of unelected bureaucrats who disagreed with President Trump’s policy initiatives and processes.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ge%2Fstory-ans
What a big surprise
It appears the trump party will continue their Russian propaganda for Putin’s piss boy trump. Goddamn traitors. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Still drinking the DPST narrative Koolaid.Only you miss him. There's enough conspiracy going around here from the right with wacko boy, the far right rancorous Ranky isn't needed. Surely not missed. But you are lost without him little Timmy. Do you need Lassie to make you feel better?
Where is IBH lately- he is missed!
Go ahead j666 - Impeach - So what - DPST have not thought about consequences. Originally Posted by oeb11
Only you miss him. There's enough conspiracy going around here from the right with wacko boy, the far right rancorous Ranky isn't needed. Surely not missed. But you are lost without him little Timmy. Do you need Lassie to make you feel better?
Little . . . little . . . timmy. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
awwww those poor pussies at the NSC. they think they make foreign policy. well they don't. this is happening because the person who does make foreign policy .. the President is unconcerned with the NSC's "opinions". Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
No, if you say so.
You know whats coming dont you? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500