Did you see this bozo at the news conference? Originally Posted by Solemate62Do mean the one who has more money than you ever will and a hotter lady when ever he wants one? That guy?
Did you see this bozo at the news conference? He shows up wearing that moronic red hat for a topic that has life and death consequences for Americans and people globally! He looks and talks like he’s out of central casting for ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” MAGA, right? Originally Posted by Solemate62
Do mean the one who has more money than you ever will and a hotter lady when ever he wants one? That guy?If money was all that mattered...Bloomberg
Oh, yea! He's smarter than you are! While you're over on Eccie whining he's working the Fall 2020 win!
You know who he is, but he doesn't give a rat's ass who you are! Originally Posted by LexusLover
But the Russians few hundred thousands influenced the 2016 election got Trump elected...Yes...it is the difference between having to run truthful ads and Russian lies spered by deplorables on Facebook!
This quote about sums it up:
"Here is the question that should (but of course won’t) put to the Democrat and Vichy Republican mewling about Russian interference in our 2016 presidential election. Think about this. Billionaire Michael Bloomberg spent over 500 million dollars on his primary run, spending it on blanket TV & Radio ads and such. However, he couldn’t even make the finals against an avowed socialist and a doddering, gaffe prone old man. By what thought process could any cogent human being believe the Russians had any noticeable influence on our election by spending a couple hundred thousand dollars on Facebook ads and a bot farm? Please!" Originally Posted by bb1961
Yes...it is the difference between having to run truthful ads and Russian lies spered by deplorables on Facebook!
Originally Posted by WTF
This quote about sums it up:The dim-retards know it's a big lie, but they keep pushing it anyway as a means to delegitimize Trump and prey on his insecurities.
"Here is the question that should (but of course won’t) put to the Democrat and Vichy Republican mewling about Russian interference in our 2016 presidential election. Think about this. Billionaire Michael Bloomberg spent over 500 million dollars on his primary run, spending it on blanket TV & Radio ads and such. However, he couldn’t even make the finals against an avowed socialist and a doddering, gaffe prone old man. By what thought process could any cogent human being believe the Russians had any noticeable influence on our election by spending a couple hundred thousand dollars on Facebook ads and a bot farm? Please!" Originally Posted by bb1961
Meanwhile, the dim-retards felt no compunction about colluding with Ukraine to release documents that got Trump's campaign manager fired less than 3 months before the 2016 election.You're just a retarded parrot. Like this guy.
Nor did the dim-retards balk at hiring foreign ex-spooks like Christopher Steele to solicit phony dirt on trump from Putin's intelligence agents, stitch it into a dossier of lies, and pedal those lies around the deep state and fake news media during the runup to the 2016 election.
Them's the facts, ma'am. Originally Posted by lustylad
Nunes also rejected Steele's claim that he communicated directly with Russian officials to gather evidence for his allegations, saying, "Do you think that the Russians, who were formally connected to the government in some way, would give Christopher Steele — who they know is doing some type of work for someone... that they would give him information on Donald Trump?"