I would think more ladies would prefer COF being that you just wipe it off and its on the exterior of their body and not in the inside of their bodies (CIM) ... I love both but prefer COF ...something about seeing the warm cum spurt out and feel how warm it is.
Reflexes should have them shut their eyes...and if not, they truly don't love feeling the warmth of cum on the skin of their face ...
Hair, they better just rinse it out, cum doesn't melt one's skin or hair ...or taint for that matter...noone likes cum on taint? IS that an option hehehehe ?
Originally Posted by Eva Damita
In my experience the appreciation of COF is higher among those who see the client/provider relationship as a business as opposed to a fantasy/personal connection. COF/COT is clearly superior in terms of things like health and pregnancy risk. It's sometimes hard to articulate this concept, so I use an example.
We were having a discussion about porn one day and if people preferred their porn with or without condoms. The vast majority preferred no condoms, but there was one guy who was furiously in the other camp. He was always a bit of a drama queen and he was yelling at people and saying how dare they put performer's health at risk for their enjoyment. He was a bondage and S&M guy and took his kinks seriously, much moreso than most of the rest of the group.
Ultimately it came down to how each camp viewed porn. Most saw it as fantasy, a substitution fantasy where you pretended to be the guy/girl and were getting it on. Thus the preference for no hat. Because in the world of fantasy there are no pregnancies/STD's. Pleasure is paramount. The less fully actualized the performers were the better because you could disregard their individual personalities and substitute yourself into the fantasy.
The other guy had no such illusions. For him porn wasn't fantasy, he actually liked watching strangers have sex. The more he knew about them the more he liked it. As such it is unconscionable to risk their health for his viewing pleasure.
Ultimately he was right. The performers are human beings and don't deserve to have their health risked, any more than a waitress in a bar deserves to get lung cancer from second hand smoke.
So COF/COT is the more morally defensible position, from a risk standpoint, but the fantasy of fulfilling the biological imperative and having the woman take the load inside her is still very compelling to a lot of people.
Ultimately I'm still more of a CIM/NQNS kind of guy, and I'll do my part for safety/health concerns another way. Keeping myself disease free and having a vasectomy both give me enough comfort that when a lovely lady takes a load of mine that she's not endangering herself. Of course the ladies are the final decision-makers.