"Safe Stripper Slide" category on P411

What's the point of this? Seems unnecessary and idiotic. Like "GFE-light."

I would think it is descriptive. Some guys might decide it does fit what they are looking for (or not).

More info is usually a good thing, not a bad thing.

you slide around on it....teasing... and then go back down for a bbbj so i can taste my own juices....ijs Its a teaser....foreplay.

I would think it is descriptive. Some guys might decide it does fit what they are looking for (or not).

More info is usually a good thing, not a bad thing. Originally Posted by Old-T

+1

And some guys , just as those who like cbj, want covered everything. It's only fair that there's an option for it.

+1

And some guys , just as those who like cbj, want covered everything. It's only fair that there's an option for it. Originally Posted by Eva Damita

I would have to agree.

I am not one that partakes in Bare Stripper Slides, however I will indulge as long as it is covered.

~GN~

Condom stripper slide that's no fun lol

So I guess what I'm asking........

I thought the whole purpose and definition of a stripper slide was skin on skin contact where she teases you with her outside lips and fingers. Basically a smaller form of BBFS....but not quite. Is a stripper slide considered any type of genital to genital contact covered or uncovered? Just figured it was worth seeing what others thought in the majority.

I think for ladys who are against and don't like stripper slides period........checking the box that says "safe stripper slide" is kinda misleading. You either do it or you don't. It just seemed like a weird title to me.......sorta like when your in the library and you go to the "non-fiction display (pause)

Don't think it's idiotic at all ... glad for it actually ... got tired of being asked if I allowed stripper slide (the "regular" kind) with my NURU massage by those who didn't bother to check my FAQ's.

Whatever we ladies offer, it's perfect for someone. I don't do uncovered sliding on naughty bits, but if he's covered it's great fun. I appreciate it being easier for clients to find what they want & for us ladies to make our preferred practices known. More options are a good thing, IMO.

Ok I'm starting to see that the ladies prefer this option.

So why not just call it what it is though.

"Bare back stripper slide"......and "covered stripper slide".

We don't say just merely blowjob (BJ) ....... and covered (CBJ), we define blowjob as bareback blowjob.

Or would that be too abrasive if it read that way? Is this the pc way to distinguish the difference.

I know there's a vocal crowd that still considers a stripper slide with no cover as BBFS.....although their is little to any vaginal penetration. So I'm wondering what these people think as well.

I would be careful with this with some providers.. I did see a woman a year ago from P411 who put down stripper slide and she wanted to do BBFS with me. not saying all providers mean that but just be wary. keep in mind I have been in the game for years although I am new to eccie

When i do nuru he is ALWAYS covered... things get slippery and dont need accidental...well..u know

It is an idiotic category. The whole point of the stripper slide is for it to be bare back. It is supposed to be the activity closest to BBFS without actual penetration. In my book, a lady either offers the stripper slide or she does not offer it. There is no such thing as a covered stripper slide. Girls who will only do the safe stripper slide are not being honest with themselves or their clients-- borderline bait and switch advertising in my book.

Borderline bully propaganda in my book.

What is sooooo fucking wrong with an alternative way to do an action? Skin a cat and all....

Sweet baby Tebow!!! Bait and switch?!? Good grief.