Then someone comes along and adds some stupid shit to cover up the original post. So we start again with a new thread because the topic is important and we will not give up to turd blossoms.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
If someone responds with what you believe to be "stupid shit," then why don't you refute it with a reasoned argument, or simply call it out for what you believe it to be, and then make your next point? That's what most people do.
But instead, you have a habit of getting frustrated when the discussion isn't going well for you (which it usually doesn't), punting, and starting a new thread on the
same topic within 24 hours.
And I believe that most participants in this forum have noticed that you seem to have a rather difficult time discerning what is "stupid shit," and what isn't.
There's no need to get frustrated and start a new thread if you can counter your critics in a reasonably cogent, articulate fashion, is there?