XNYrker, according to Tex you're a carpetbagger so remember that.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, mop-boy?
Let see how stupid you look
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Not half as stupid as you look.
did you see that woman swerve her car trying to hit anyone?
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Yes. I did. Did you even watch that video? When she backed up and rammed the police car, she had the wheels cut to the left so that the nose of the car swung to the right. Three cops close to the passenger side had to jump out of the way to avoid being hit by the front right fender and being run over by the right front wheel. The woman then cut the wheel to the right and accelerated forward. Those same three guys has to jump out of the way again.
Here is the video link. It is embedded on the left side of the article:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/04/us/dc-...html?hpt=hp_t2
No, she backed up into a police CAR, turned, and sped away. Sounds, and looks, like she was trying to escape and not commit mayhem.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Read what I wrote above and watch the video.
She had already been on one high speed chase when the video started. Then, as you admit, she rammed a police car behind her. In so doing, she almost ran over the 3 guys on the passenger side of the car, then she led cops on a second high speed chase (an escape as you call it) through crowded streets in the nation's capital.
And from this you conclude she was NOT trying to commit mayhem? Look up the word non sequitur, professor.
We don't shoot fleeing ciminals in this country (not normally).
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
We do if they are endangering people in a high-speed chase.
Then again Bush is no longer in office so you will accept unconditionally anything that comes out of the government.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I didn't accept anything unconditionally when Bush was in office and I don't accept anything unconditionally now, mop-boy.