https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13923
offensive costumes is hate speech and jailing them? that is sad.
prolly everyone here in this forum is jailbait like it is in Britain with their hate crime laws on the books.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13930 Originally Posted by matchingmole
Similar to the psychiatrists' Goldwater Rule, our code of ethics exhorts psychologists to "take precautions" that any statements they make to the media "are based on their professional knowledge, training or experience in accord with appropriate psychological literature and practice" and "do not indicate that a professional relationship has been established" with people in the public eye, including political candidates.
When providing opinions of psychological characteristics, psychologists must conduct an examination "adequate to support statements or conclusions." In other words, our ethical code states that psychologists should not offer a diagnosis in the media of a living public figure they have not examined.[9]
i personally think you are crazy. and you prove me right on a daily basis. oh sorry, i meant ecky9.5k .. you i just find amusing.
once again we need to remind your mind that such opinions are just that, opinion and not ethically supported by the main two bodies of Psychiatric care.Guess you have never seen any of his speeches
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule
On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.[1]
Similar to the psychiatrists' Goldwater Rule, our code of ethics exhorts psychologists to "take precautions" that any statements they make to the media "are based on their professional knowledge, training or experience in accord with appropriate psychological literature and practice" and "do not indicate that a professional relationship has been established" with people in the public eye, including political candidates.Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
When providing opinions of psychological characteristics, psychologists must conduct an examination "adequate to support statements or conclusions." In other words, our ethical code states that psychologists should not offer a diagnosis in the media of a living public figure they have not examined.[9]
i personally think you are crazy. and you prove me right on a daily basis. oh sorry, i meant ecky9.5k .. you i just find amusing.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13930 Originally Posted by matchingmole