The Passing on of Defective DNA, and Other Stupdidity

In our once great nation, it isn't hard to see the seeds of decline. Here is one:

Gay men using surrogacy to reproduce and raise children. What possible good does it do for single fathers to purposefully reproduce, raise children in a single parent gay household, and pass on their faulty genetic propensity (since you say being gay isn't a choice) to suck dick. Even you liberals use gay insults against your political enemies.

Here is another: The convicted traitor Bradly Manning wants to live out his sentence in military prison as a woman. He is suing to get hormone replacement therapy paid for by the taxpayers, as well as counseling, special living arrangements, etc. I'm sure millions will be spent litigating this bullshit when the best solution would be to let him get his ass kicked twice a day in the yard until he gets his mind right, and stops putting his dirt in the warden's ditch (a metaphor for being a dickhead), like what happened to our pal Cool Hand Luke.

In our once great nation, it isn't hard to see the seeds of decline. Here is one:

Gay men using surrogacy to reproduce and raise children. What possible good does it do for single fathers to purposefully reproduce, raise children in a single parent gay household, and pass on their faulty genetic propensity (since you say being gay isn't a choice) to suck dick. Even you liberals use gay insults against your political enemies.

Here is another: The convicted traitor Bradly Manning wants to live out his sentence in military prison as a woman. He is suing to get hormone replacement therapy paid for by the taxpayers, as well as counseling, special living arrangements, etc. I'm sure millions will be spent litigating this bullshit when the best solution would be to let him get his ass kicked twice a day in the yard until he gets his mind right, and stops putting his dirt in the warden's ditch (a metaphor for being a dickhead), like what happened to our pal Cool Hand Luke. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

once great Nation ?

fuck you ... LEAVE shitstain !

once great Nation ?

fuck you ... LEAVE shitstain ! Originally Posted by CJ7

You don't see the decline?

You don't see the decline? Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

yeah, ever since ass hooks like you found their way out of the shallow end of the gene pool and started muddying up the deep end too.

Perfect argument for nutting the jewrish pissant.

In our once great nation, it isn't hard to see the seeds of decline. Here is one:

Gay men using surrogacy to reproduce and raise children. What possible good does it do for single fathers to purposefully reproduce, raise children in a single parent gay household, and pass on their faulty genetic propensity (since you say being gay isn't a choice) to suck dick. Even you liberals use gay insults against your political enemies.

Here is another: The convicted traitor Bradly Manning wants to live out his sentence in military prison as a woman. He is suing to get hormone replacement therapy paid for by the taxpayers, as well as counseling, special living arrangements, etc. I'm sure millions will be spent litigating this bullshit when the best solution would be to let him get his ass kicked twice a day in the yard until he gets his mind right, and stops putting his dirt in the warden's ditch (a metaphor for being a dickhead), like what happened to our pal Cool Hand Luke. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

shame your parents didn't know about condoms.

You don't see the decline? Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

The decline is very evident. Just in the past week a 22 year old baseball player is murdered for the fun of it and an 88 year old WWII veteran is beaten to death by Gangstas, but this was not racist according to the press. Drugs and gangs are all over the streets. I will now come under attack from the Gang of Ignorants that roam this forum, but they are not worth bothering with.

In our once great nation, it isn't hard to see the seeds of decline. Here is one:

Gay men using surrogacy to reproduce and raise children. What possible good does it do for single fathers to purposefully reproduce, raise children in a single parent gay household, and pass on their faulty genetic propensity (since you say being gay isn't a choice) to suck dick. Even you liberals use gay insults against your political enemies.

Here is another: The convicted traitor Bradly Manning wants to live out his sentence in military prison as a woman. He is suing to get hormone replacement therapy paid for by the taxpayers, as well as counseling, special living arrangements, etc. I'm sure millions will be spent litigating this bullshit when the best solution would be to let him get his ass kicked twice a day in the yard until he gets his mind right, and stops putting his dirt in the warden's ditch (a metaphor for being a dickhead), like what happened to our pal Cool Hand Luke. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

You're knowledge of genetics is abhorrent.

Does it not occur to you that gays are born from heterosexual pairing?

And there has never been a study demonstrating that closeted gays who have children produce gay children at any higher rate than heterosexuals.

In other words, assuming gays make up 3% of the population, it appears that heterosexual-only couples and couples that include at least one gay parent both produce gay offspring at about the same 3% rate.

So, while there is definitely a large genetic component to being gay, it does not appear to be heritable.

Which makes sense, because if a gayness gene WAS passed on, then the heritable gay gene would cause itself to go extinct, since most gays would NOT go on to have a lot of children compared to heterosexuals.

The decline is very evident. Just in the past week a 22 year old baseball player is murdered for the fun of it and an 88 year old WWII veteran is beaten to death by Gangstas, but this was not racist according to the press. Drugs and gangs are all over the streets. I will now come under attack from the Gang of Ignorants that roam this forum, but they are not worth bothering with. Originally Posted by FlectiNonFrangi

maybe those murders were the result of nothing more than misguided youth raised by gay men.
....after all it's one of the "seeds of decline of our once great nation " ...well according to JL it is

The decline is very evident. Just in the past week a 22 year old baseball player is murdered for the fun of it and an 88 year old WWII veteran is beaten to death by Gangstas, but this was not racist according to the press. Drugs and gangs are all over the streets. I will now come under attack from the Gang of Ignorants that roam this forum, but they are not worth bothering with. Originally Posted by FlectiNonFrangi

Uh, no, just your apparent disregard for facts and statistics (though thanks for your opinion) will come under dispute (attack is so dramatic, quit being such a drama queen please) so I would opine that makes some of us a "Gang of Informed's" instead. Apparently you haven't read a whole lot of US history and you didn't note the steep decline of voilent crime all over the nation beginning in the 1990's? But of course you didn't if you see any of the lamestream news (especially local) that tends to just show inflammatory and sickening violence for ratings.

Didn't you hear about Prohibition and all the organized crime (speaking of drugs and gangs) if fostered or how about the killings of slaves and blacks in the South before 1865 or for 100 years after under Jim Crow, speaking of racism. Then there is the genocide against Native Americans (technically it may not classify as genocide for a couple of reasons, but pretty damn close) not to mention the incarceration of the Japanese and laws against Chinese immigration, plus the violence of the West for most of the 19th century. America has always been a violent and degenerate country in many ways which makes its contradictions all the more ironic and interesting. If anything, we actually may be better than we ever were (except if you take Andy Griffith and My Three Sons as documentaries) in terms of degenerate violence and racism. Very few of us were even alive when this nation was the "once great nations" that JL is eulogizing so who really gets to define how "great" our nation was? The old white men who wrote the history books of the time or women, jews (JL - that one was for you. Ask some older Jews how great this nation was to them since many had to change their names and even discard their religion and culture to fit in) blacks, Native Americans, gays? Do any of them count?

If you are talking about decline in the international sense, then I would submit that because other nations have grown up and gotten stronger does not make it a decline for us. If you were the older brother in a large family with boys, just because you could always beat your younger siblings up until they grew up and became men does not mean that you have declined. Besides, just being the strongest industrial and military power (which we actually were for a very very short period of time) does not necessarily make us the greatest nation, so conversely, not being that industrial/military behemoth does not diminish us IMHO, but actually may make us a better nation overall. That is just my opinion so take it or leave it, but I think there are some salient points I made against your thesis.

DEFECTIVE DNA?

are you fucking kidding? I think Hitler believed that. Obviously you're a fraud, JL. Or you haven't been to any Holocaust Museums, former concentration camps or ... SCHOOL.

You continue to be a fucking disgrace.

Hope you get online from Israel. You won't last long with that kind of talk ... We'll be watching. closely.

DEFECTIVE DNA?

DEFECTIVE DNA?



DEFECTIVE DNA? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

you are the perfect example of it

and you're a fucking idiot. Obviously.

You're knowledge of genetics is abhorrent.

Does it not occur to you that gays are born from heterosexual pairing?

And there has never been a study demonstrating that closeted gays who have children produce gay children at any higher rate than heterosexuals. You sure about that?


What might be the origin of biological differences underlying male sexual preference? In 1993 Dean Hamer and his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute discovered a preliminary but nevertheless tantalizing clue.[9] Hamer began his painstaking search for a genetic contribution to sexual behavior by studying the rates of homosexuality among male relatives of seventy-six known gay men. He found that the incidence of homosexual preference in these family members was strikingly higher (13.5 percent) than the rate of homosexuality among the whole sample (2 percent). When he looked at the patterns of sexual orientation among these families, he discovered more gay relatives on the maternal side. Homosexuality seemed, at least, to be passed from generation to generation through women.
Maternal inheritance could be explained if there was a gene influencing sexual orientation on the X chromosome, one of the two human sex chromosomes that bear genes determining the sex of offspring.[10] Men have both X and Y chromosomes, while women have two X chromosomes. A male sex-determining gene, called SRY, is found on the Y chromosome. Indeed, the Y chromosome is the most obvious site for defining male sexuality since it is the only one of the forty-six human chromosomes to be found in men alone. The SRY gene is the most likely candidate both to turn on a gene that prevents female development and to trigger testosterone production. Since the female has no Y chromosome, she lacks this masculinizing gene. In forty pairs of homosexual brothers, Hamer and his team looked for associations between the DNA on the X chromosome and the homosexual trait. They found that thirty-three pairs of brothers shared the same five X chromosomal DNA "markers," or genetic signatures, at a region near the end of the long arm of the X chromosome designated Xq28.[11] The possibility that this observation could have occurred by chance was only 1 in 10,000.

In other words, assuming gays make up 3% of the population, it appears that heterosexual-only couples and couples that include at least one gay parent both produce gay offspring at about the same 3% rate.

So, while there is definitely a large genetic component to being gay, it does not appear to be heritable.

Which makes sense, because if a gayness gene WAS passed on, then the heritable gay gene would cause itself to go extinct, since most gays would NOT go on to have a lot of children compared to heterosexuals. Originally Posted by ExNYer

Actually, gays only reproduced with their defective DNA because they were forced to blend in, reproduce, and conform to society via a family. Ironically, the very enlightenment of society that worships gays will ultimately diminish them because now that they are free to be themselves and live out their gay existence, many fewer will reproduce in contrived heterosexual pairings with females.
This surrogacy for gay fathers will hopefully remain expensive and little used.
I don't see that it is legitimate to say homosexuality is an genetic trait, i.e. they are born gay, and has no heritable component. See my citation in pink.

Just shameful. Your parents must be so proud of the son they raised.