You're forgetting, that any misdeeds Fanny Willis is involved with regarding misappropriation of funding, has absolutely zero to do with the allegations that she represents
Originally Posted by eyecu2
To quote Jonathon Turley:
The Georgia courts have established that a district attorney should be disqualified when there is a personal interest in the defendant’s conviction (Whitworth v. State, 275 Ga. App. 790, 793, 622 S.E.2d 21 [2005]). In this instance, Willis has staked much of her career on this case and appointed a prosecutor who’s alleged to be romantically involved with her; likewise, if the allegations are true, Willis may have an interest in furthering Wade’s career and benefits. Of course, Trump, the other defendants, and the public are entitled to disinterested prosecutors in this major case.
regardless of the distraction that is currently trying to be placed in front of her.
Originally Posted by eyecu2
LOL - I am glad you think that Fani committing fraud is "a distraction"
If Fanny has anything to answer for, she will - and I'm pretty sure she's going to come out without much in the way of trouble.
Originally Posted by eyecu2
Turley again
Moreover, the Fulton County Code of Laws § 2-66 bars conflicts of interest “in fact and in appearance.” It expressly states that no “officer or employee shall, by his or her conduct, give reasonable basis for the impression that any person can improperly influence him or her, or unduly enjoy his or her favor, in the performance of any official acts or actions.” These provisions are in addition to prohibitions on the receipt of gifts due to one’s office, such as possibly receiving alleged lavish vacations paid for by your subordinate.
These are just some of the grounds supporting a motion by Michael Roman, one of the defendants in the massive racketeering case brought by Willis.
If these allegations are true,
Willis is not just outside of the ethical navigational beacons. She is off the map.