Natalie Jones wants to be become my next ATF? Really?
Well the first thing she would have to do is show up for the appt her 'assistant' Ashley made for her.
Natalie Jones' assistant (Ashley) agreed to a 1130 AM appt with Natalie for me. As I called at 1130 to get the final directions to the room, I was told Natalie was not available. There was no message left on my voice mail. I was told the last minute cancellation-message was left on a PM on eccie. Since I was driving to the session, it is unreasonable to think I might have been reached by PM. No reason has been given for the cancellation. Ashley could not tell me what or why, and insisted the fault was mine because I could not be reached. I hung up at that point.
Natalie called me from a restricted phone and played the part of the sophisticated business woman, and did so poorly. In a PM she had asked for more discreet communications in the future, saying she was certain I would understand. I am posting the remainder of my communication with her here in this forum as a "heads-up" to my brethren. I will appreciate your feedback. My response to NJ is as follows:
"No, I do NOT understand as you might think. What I do understand from the events of the day are:
1. You and Ashley got your signals crossed. She scheduled a session after having taken 20 minutes or so to 'check your calendar', contingent ONLY on the veracity of my references (which have NEVER been found wanting before).
2. You suggested, requested and even urged that I accept Ashley as your stand in, to be the escort instead of yourself.
3. Now you request 'more discretion in our communications.'
No, I do not understand in your terms, by which I infer that you think your actions were reasonable. No, I do NOT understand.
Your actions were NOT reasonable, for no real reason has been stated, no explanation offered.
The PM from you is oblique at best, which only irritates me more. The most I can make of this message is that you desire 'more discretion' from me. How so? I have communicated with through a PM and through your 'assistant' whom you have also described as serving in a substitute role by design on just such an occasion as this.
I have mulled over these items at length and stated some conclusions in a lengthy PM which I copied to a MOD for review and advice.
My interpretation of the events and my conclusions are:
1. I was stood up, NO SHOW.
2. You engaged in Bait and Switch, offering a substitute as a remedy because you were unavailable for the time appointed by your assistant who is also your substitute.
3. In your PM you have asked for more discretion in our communications. How so? How do you think was I indiscreet, specifically? How do you define discretion?
4. In the bait and switch request, you sought to sell the deal by appealing to my male ego, stating that Ashley is much more beautiful than you. You have little idea of my concept of beauty, which includes much more than mere appearance. I doubt you have the requisite sophistication to understand. In any event, I do not accept last minute surrogates, which constitutes a blind date. I have never had such a deal work out satisfactorily.
5. I believe this event was set up intentionally, by design as part of a business plan to establish Ashley on her own using your apron strings to gain entree and some standing in this community. In your call to me, you said she was frantic at my irritation and refusal; and that you had assured her that I would be visiting her soon that very day.
That is rather presumptive on your part. More than presumptive, it is manipulative toward her; and arrogant, condescending toward me. Having never spoken to me you assumed and told her that I would indulge you and accept her as a substitute for yourself. It shows prior intent to deceive me.
If you wish to introduce her to us, publish her pix and give us the choice.
What now? Do not think that I will ever call you again. It is not a matter of fence mending. There is no fence to be mended with me. That neighborly fence has been blown down by your misdeeds of yesterday. I will not even share a drink with you because of these grievous breeches of trust."
This memo (editing out her original PM to me) has already been posted in the Men's Lounge today (8:34 AM), and now in the ALERTS, and perhaps as a thread in the INDEPENDENTS forum (unless advised by a MOD not to do so).
I have no malice toward her. But neither do I trust her. Unless she changes your ways, she might suffer loss of others' trust, too.
To my brethren, Caveat emptor.