ThreADs! A favorite topic. and slight nod to Thread Hijacking....

ThreADs! A favorite topic. and slight nod to Thread Hijacking....and me of course.... I am so misunderstood!

Let me begin by saying that many of the threads I will be starting in the coming weeks will be a result of your staff having very tight opinions on what "Thread Hijacking" is..... ALlow me to explain...

The following comments was made in another thread about BBFS.

What's the over/under on the mod saying " Please do not revive threads longer than 30 days old"? Originally Posted by super_delfin00

That's what he wants. He wants mods to go against the rules and show that they treat some people differently. If his hand gets smacked when he didn't break the rules, he wins.

Notice how he and SL complained about threADs, despite being told that threADs were allowed? He thinks threADs are annoying, and so he can be annoying within the rules too. Originally Posted by KCQuestor

Although I would Like to reply directly IN that thread your staff has used a very narrow definition of Thread Hijacking to try to censor my input.

I am not sure whether either of the above 2 members received warnings and/or points as firends and myself my have for similar posts... Considering what I have read I don't know why they have not pointed out yet.....

So in response to KC Qestor's comment....

a) No. I do not want MODs to go against the "rules"... ECCIE does not have rules.... It has "Guidelines" that are interpreted in the majority of areas in a similar fashion but not here in KC Metro it seems. What I would like to see is a staff that can separate their personal bias and dislike of a member from their actions. If they cannot they should be replaced.

b) No. I do not think all threADs are annoying. I believe many threADs are entertaining and spark interest and if not misused I welcome them as a way to see a different side of a whore I may not have known

c) It is unfortunate though that some whores display constant desperation in their attempt to garner attention in CoEd through the use of threADs. We usually see this from the older and/or fatter less desireable ones.

d) Which bring me to the part about threADS I enjoy. We are allowed to voice our displeasure about the threADS and members are USUALLY given a lot of leeway in doing so. I am not quite sure how that works here in KC yet....

So, now you're complaining about somebody who does what you do?

Yep, you's a Trump supporter all right!



Miguel de Cervantes

ThreADs! A favorite topic. and slight nod to Thread Hijacking....and me of course.... I am so misunderstood!

Let me begin by saying that many of the threads I will be starting in the coming weeks will be a result of your staff having very tight opinions on what "Thread Hijacking" is..... ALlow me to explain...

The following comments was made in another thread about BBFS.






Although I would Like to reply directly IN that thread your staff has used a very narrow definition of Thread Hijacking to try to censor my input.

I am not sure whether either of the above 2 members received warnings and/or points as firends and myself my have for similar posts... Considering what I have read I don't know why they have not pointed out yet.....

So in response to KC Qestor's comment....

a) No. I do not want MODs to go against the "rules"... ECCIE does not have rules.... It has "Guidelines" that are interpreted in the majority of areas in a similar fashion but not here in KC Metro it seems. What I would like to see is a staff that can separate their personal bias and dislike of a member from their actions. If they cannot they should be replaced.

b) No. I do not think all threADs are annoying. I believe many threADs are entertaining and spark interest and if not misused I welcome them as a way to see a different side of a whore I may not have known

c) It is unfortunate though that some whores display constant desperation in their attempt to garner attention in CoEd through the use of threADs. We usually see this from the older and/or fatter less desireable ones.

d) Which bring me to the part about threADS I enjoy. We are allowed to voice our displeasure about the threADS and members are USUALLY given a lot of leeway in doing so. I am not quite sure how that works here in KC yet.... Originally Posted by Whispers

So, now you're complaining about somebody who does what you do?

No. I don't believe I did that. I clarified that I do not have a problem threADs

Yep, you's a Trump supporter all right! Originally Posted by dumars

I believe there is a forum in which you may start threads and make comments regarding someone's politics. Your continual mention of TRUMP strikes me as an attempt to hijack a thread into a political conversation.

I appreciate the attention you pay to the topics I start but please try to be on subject.

What's the over/under on this thread being shut down?

I interpret the original post as someone grabbed some KC points for thread hijacking? That's funny.

And hey, maybe when the ban hammer falls maybe Yummie Marie will come along and start a protest thread for you too — won't that make it all worthwhile?